If you find Reelbus to cpu intensive then you won't find Satin better. Reelbus is just a bit less than Satin, around 4% in an empty Ableton project, where Satin is about 5%.recursive one wrote:It seems that everybody in this world but me has already tested Satin. I don't own the Slate's tape thingy, but I wonder how good Satin is compared to TB Reelbus. I don't care much about authenticity, what I use the Reelbus for is to soften transients and add some low-mid warmth on 2buss so I wonder whether Satin can do the same thing but with better quality (that is, better enough to justify the price gap) and also whether it is more CPU efficient (Reelbus is a considerable hog at my system and it keeps me from using Reelbus on tracks, I have to replace it with VoS Ferric which I like less soundwise).
I don't agree. Nothing beats the TB Reelbus Old and Rusty algorithm for wow & flutter. But I like that obvious effect.TheoM wrote: Reelbuss vs satin is like comparing ren verb to lex/exponential audio. There's no comparison.


