Thanks! I need to take a look at both of these then, both $49. Are you saying Purity is more versatile then or better at other sounds? I asked cause you mentioned the quality of the strings and the praise you be giving Purity!HaganeSteel wrote:I think so. I guess both it and the M1 kind of break even on that, because even though the M1 was the original, it takes a bit of work to get that production-ready sound. I feel the M1 is kind of messy when it's raw.musikmachine wrote:So would this be well suited to dance pianos and strings, organs etc? I'm on the lookout for a rompler and this could fit the bill.
The upside, though, is that the M1 gives you a stereo out for each of its 8 channels, so it's not like you'll have to bounce anything to audio.
I think a lot of Purity's sounds are perfect for that, but the M1 is the real deal, and I write video game music, not dance music, so take what I say with a grain of salt.
What I do think is that Purity is probably better at making other dance sounds, and has a built-in arp and sequencer. So you could theoretically use Purity for everything.
So this is how I feel: the M1 for purists, but Purity if you're not emotionally attached to the M1.
Thanks.ENV1 wrote:Get the 64bit of VSTHost.I will look into this.
It's a question of how good they are compared to standalone instruments like the Kontakt stuff and if it has production ready sounds but sounds like has from what you're saying. Added to the list anyway.
