FL Studio still the top dog!

Audio Plugin Hosts and other audio software applications discussion
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS
FL Studio All Plugins Edition

Post

TTBOMK, currently, you cannot open FL as a vst in x64 even in beta....very important for some of us ;)

Post

hibidy wrote:TTBOMK, currently, you cannot open FL as a vst in x64 even in beta....very important for some of us ;)
hey, it works without problems here! i just did it yesterday: i opened FL x64 beta within Studio One x64.
Whoever wants music instead of noise, joy instead of pleasure, soul instead of gold, creative work instead of business, passion instead of foolery, finds no home in this trivial world of ours.

Post

bmanic wrote:It's also because the piano roll in FL Studio is simply brilliant. I've yet to use anything that comes even close to the awesomeness of FL Studio's piano roll.
I agree with this also the piano roll integrates really well with a pen tablet which is blessing for reducing RSI from tons of mouse clicks in the editor ;)

As for the topic, yes it's the best at what it does, just a tool as so many have said. And performance mode :love:

Back in my shell now.

Post

Yeah, the piano roll in Fruity is quite awesome!

I bought Fruity a few years back when it was on some kind of crazy sale, but I honestly never really used it!
It's definitely a very deep software and can do a lot of stuff! I just don't really have a use for it.
It's also very difficut to get used to the workflow after using more "traditional" stuff for so many years, but I think it's quite easy to learn for people who aren't used to something else yet.

The lifetime free updates are really cool too! After each update I load it up once and check which cool new toys I just got for free :hihi:
Sometimes I make a sound or two with the new toys and use them in other stuff, but I really don't do much else with it.

I would definitely sell it if I could, not because it's "bad" or anything, I just don't need it.

Cheers
Dennis

Post

Years ago I tried out Fruity and thought 'finally a sequencer that thinks like I do'..but ultimately I went the route of Orion and Cubase. Then I bought Fruity and could not make heads nor tails out of it, lol. I do fire it up every now and then, but have never finished anything in it. Someday..

Post

[DELETED]

Post

TheoM wrote:i've spent the last hour with it on mac (it actually runs fine here, still haven't had a crash) and even the riff machine doesn't make sense to me. The whole thing just doesn't make any sense. Oh, i CAN make a beat with it.
wow! one hour really?

if you dont get that the riff machine generates melodies etc. in the piano roll you better stay away from FL Theo! :lol:

ps. great feature btw.
Last edited by murnau on Sun Nov 03, 2013 2:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Whoever wants music instead of noise, joy instead of pleasure, soul instead of gold, creative work instead of business, passion instead of foolery, finds no home in this trivial world of ours.

Post

murnau wrote:
hibidy wrote:TTBOMK, currently, you cannot open FL as a vst in x64 even in beta....very important for some of us ;)
hey, it works without problems here! i just did it yesterday: i opened FL x64 beta within Studio One x64.
And no problem here in Cubase 7 x64.

Post

[DELETED]

Post

Yeah it'a bit random, i just disable the steps to work on an existing score but if you go into each step you can edit the controls. I could be wrong but i think chord on default doesn't generate a chord.
Latest release and Socials: https://linktr.ee/ph.i.ltr3

Post

TheoM wrote:I get that but it's completely illogical. It starts with a melody then every function from there on just doesn't work as I would expect. For example hitting the chords tab I then expect it to start making chords. It doesn't. It just continues to play the same melody,

Oh, I was completely proficient in logic within hours btw.
after hitting the chord tab the next step would be to select which chord type via the pattern folder just on the same gui (needs a second) - where's the problem?

"as you expect" isn't very fair towards them dont you think?

ps. the best thing is anyway that you always have (on the left upper corner of the screen) a help sentence everywhere you move over with the mouse.
Last edited by murnau on Sun Nov 03, 2013 5:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Whoever wants music instead of noise, joy instead of pleasure, soul instead of gold, creative work instead of business, passion instead of foolery, finds no home in this trivial world of ours.

Post

[DELETED]

Post

TheoM wrote:You're kidding right? If a program doesn't follow what I think is logical and I express that, when its a point of view, that's unfair to image line? Well let's just say they owe me BIG time anyway, I haven't even scratched the surface of debt. Thanks. (And ps no I won't go into that, anyone can find my topic from 2008 if interested - same problems persist).
maybe they write a personal fl studio for you? "Theo's Edition"? :lol:

how they can deal with "what i think" when every individual expect something else? thats not unfair?

or do you think your way doing things is the only best for the rest of us? now, then that make sense.
Whoever wants music instead of noise, joy instead of pleasure, soul instead of gold, creative work instead of business, passion instead of foolery, finds no home in this trivial world of ours.

Post

[DELETED]

Post

Yep, you can chalk me up as another FL Studio licensee who also finds it bewildering and counterintuitive, despite my long background in primitive Amiga trackers all the way up through Renoise and just about every other DAW on the market. I can generally get up and running with most any sequencer within 15 minutes or so, but for whatever reason FL's design workflow defies my expectations at almost every turn, save for the initial step sequencer beat window that pops up at launch. I don't doubt that a proficient user can accomplish almost anything with it, but my motivation to rethink so many commonly shared industry conventions has never been strong enough to truly learn FL Studio in-depth.

Post Reply

Return to “Hosts & Applications (Sequencers, DAWs, Audio Editors, etc.)”