I think Lode_Runner might mean "note & controller data" sequencing instead of strictly MIDI. And if you're not using external hardware, real MIDI mostly doesn't even matter.elassi wrote:In the beginning FLS was not MIDI friendly at all. Hence some very cool (and nowhere else to be found) tools were invented: e.g. Formula controller and Peak controller. They show their non-MIDI roots in the simple fact that they don't produce any MIDI-signals to date - but their output is available "system-wide" within FLS.Lode_Runner wrote:Semantics aside, I do agree with CT Stump that FL Studio is much more focused on MIDI sequencing than audio recording...
Together with the already mentioned Riff machine and other helpers it is quite obvious that FLS's roots were neither MIDI nor Audio-oriented (the discontinued Fruity Tracks is evidence here, too). In the early days it was just a very clever and handsome computer application - born and made for computers and respective users.
This has changed a LOT - like Ableton Live for instance changed a lot. There were even users that cried about Live going too much traditional thus leaving its original approach.
For integrating MIDI hardware, FL Studio can be very frustrating (the older it is, the worse it gets).