Ok great, thanks for clarifying but i still think that lower increments that even could be done hert by hert would be way better then as it stands now and the aliasing would be smother and more analog sounding.EvilDragon wrote:No, the step increments from 0-127 are not linear at all, they are mapped differently (meaning that there is no fixed step difference between each increment of parameter value, things increase really fast in speed above value 64 or so). And this still has nothing to do with the resulting modulation of the LFO ("they don't sound as good in audio range" has absolutely nothing with the parameter range being 0-127, and increasing this range to 14-bit won't change that, you would only get finer increments - but the way LFO modulation is carried out wouldn't change at all).
Also I didn't say LFOs go to 1000 Hz, I said that parameter UPDATE RATE is 1000 Hz. That's different. If LFOs are done digitally, that would mean they go to up around 500 Hz. If they are pushed above that limit, then you get aliasing (Nyquist theorem). If LFOs are analog, though, there's no aliasing and they can go faster than that.
I already stated that i like this synth a lot and would not be posting if i didn't care to see it doing great, but there are some things that need to be addressed and improvised for it to make it in such a competitive market.
Is it not suppose to be and sound analog? So if there are things that sound digital and can be improvised those things should be done.
Ingo already said they were talking about implementing 14 bit for some parameters, would be great to know how long is that going to take?
I guess a lot of people would like to know details on that, as everyone seems to really like the synth but we do want 14 bit midi!!
Best regards