Phoenix and the others./ Search for the most Natural reverb
-
- KVRian
- 1401 posts since 9 Feb, 2012
We have Phoenix and R2 in the lab now as of the Pro Tools Expert "AES exclusive deal." They are both great, but I'd give phoenixverb the edge between the two for being less in cost and more original. I'd say PV is natural and transparent, though those aren't terms I use much. I suppose given one word, I would choose "unobtrusive."
We also have the SSL Duende X-Verb, which I would compare favorably with Phoenix. To me, X-Verb is to the LX480 as PV is to R2. Our Lexicon PCM and full Valhalla DSP suite plug-ins cover the territory between these two pairs, along with CSR, Eos, Toraverb, Eventide 2016 Stereo Room and others as orthogonal offshoots.
Flux/IRCAM, 2C and as mentioned, eareverb, are worthy neutral considerations that we don't have. I mean, you have to draw the line somewhere, right? Then, of course, there is convolution... not really my cup of tea for other than delayed real-time reverse reverb using algorithmically generated IRs. Although, this hybrid looks interesting:
http://www.supremepiano.com/product/reverb.html
Additional TC Electronic hardware to consider is the Reverb 4000 which covers VSS3/4 and other TC topologies.
We also have the SSL Duende X-Verb, which I would compare favorably with Phoenix. To me, X-Verb is to the LX480 as PV is to R2. Our Lexicon PCM and full Valhalla DSP suite plug-ins cover the territory between these two pairs, along with CSR, Eos, Toraverb, Eventide 2016 Stereo Room and others as orthogonal offshoots.
Flux/IRCAM, 2C and as mentioned, eareverb, are worthy neutral considerations that we don't have. I mean, you have to draw the line somewhere, right? Then, of course, there is convolution... not really my cup of tea for other than delayed real-time reverse reverb using algorithmically generated IRs. Although, this hybrid looks interesting:
http://www.supremepiano.com/product/reverb.html
Additional TC Electronic hardware to consider is the Reverb 4000 which covers VSS3/4 and other TC topologies.
WEASEL: World Electro-Acoustic Sound Excitation Laboratories
-
Arrested Developer Arrested Developer https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=278287
- KVRian
- 677 posts since 8 Apr, 2012
toothnclaw wrote:I'd say don't use a second reverb just for ER, that would be an insult to Phoenix. Rather, just use something like Proximity by VladG.
Are you just guessing or did you do lots of tests with lots of reverbs in different situations?
-
- Banned
- 454 posts since 30 Apr, 2013
It's just my humble opinion which I thought could be useful to someone. You could use all software reverbs chained on a single track if you wish, it's all the same to me.Arrested Developer wrote:toothnclaw wrote:I'd say don't use a second reverb just for ER, that would be an insult to Phoenix. Rather, just use something like Proximity by VladG.
Are you just guessing or did you do lots of tests with lots of reverbs in different situations?
-
Arrested Developer Arrested Developer https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=278287
- KVRian
- 677 posts since 8 Apr, 2012
My question is: what's you're "humble" opinion based on which comes to the conclusion that using Phoenix together with additional ER of another engine would "insult" Phoenix? Are you familiar with the achieved results in different situations or are you just guessing?toothnclaw wrote:It's just my humble opinion which I thought could be useful to someone. You could use all software reverbs chained on a single track if you wish, it's all the same to me.Arrested Developer wrote:toothnclaw wrote:I'd say don't use a second reverb just for ER, that would be an insult to Phoenix. Rather, just use something like Proximity by VladG.
Are you just guessing or did you do lots of tests with lots of reverbs in different situations?
-
- KVRian
- 750 posts since 30 Aug, 2011 from somewhere in universe
It's impossible to be familiar with the results in every different situation, don't you find? So stop it. It was just an opinion not a statement of fact.Arrested Developer wrote:My question is: what's you're "humble" opinion based on which comes to the conclusion that using Phoenix together with additional ER of another engine would "insult" Phoenix? Are you familiar with the achieved results in different situations or are you just guessing?
Wonder whether my advice worth a penny? Check my music at Soundcloud and decide for yourself.
re:vibe and Loki Fuego @ Soundcloud
re:vibe and Loki Fuego @ Soundcloud
-
Arrested Developer Arrested Developer https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=278287
- KVRian
- 677 posts since 8 Apr, 2012
I think it's bad behaviour to judge constellations that one does not know.Loki Fuego wrote: It's impossible to be familiar with the results in every different situation, don't you find?
But to answer your question: if one has a slight idea of the possibilities, Phoenix and True Verb give you in sculpting your sound, and if you are familiar with some basics in production techniques, you won't come up with such a statement.
and an insulting statement like:
is just childish and not constructive.You could use all software reverbs chained on a single track if you wish,
- KVRian
- 1473 posts since 1 Jan, 2005 from Norway
Hi!
http://acondigital.com/software/beta/Ve ... _0_9_7.exe
http://acondigital.com/software/beta/Ve ... _0_9_7.exe
http://acondigital.com/software/beta/Ve ... 7.mpkg.zip
Any feedback is highly appreciated...
We expect to release in two to three weeks time.
Stian
Since you bring up this issue, I wanted to let you know that we are working on a new algorithmic reverb plug-in called Acon Digital Verberate that is currently in beta stage. Verberate uses new methods to achieve very dense reverb tails combined with a realistic simulation of early reflections. Demo versions are available below (VST for Win32 and Win64 as well as AU and VST for OS X, respectively):Tapehead wrote:As the title suggests, I have a question about the most natural reverb in VST format.
http://acondigital.com/software/beta/Ve ... _0_9_7.exe
http://acondigital.com/software/beta/Ve ... _0_9_7.exe
http://acondigital.com/software/beta/Ve ... 7.mpkg.zip
Any feedback is highly appreciated...
Stian
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 253 posts since 26 Nov, 2008
I'm currently very interested in how Flux/IRCAM session reverb stacks up against Phoenix in the transparency and "unobtrusive-nessy" department. Does it play in the same league as Phoenix?
I auditioned other suggestions in this thread and once again reverbs such as c2 and b2 are way too effected (effect-sy). Definitely not my cup of tea.
X-Verb is on the other hand is a bit of a surprise. Not that it is totally unobtrusive but it has some very pleasant vibe and it is flexible enough for my needs. I'd consider it if it was around $100 but closer to $200 I think
Phoenix looks much more appealing.
EAReverb is also seem to be good but I had a feel that there was something stiff about it. By all accounts, I should've liked it and it did sound good on my acoustic fingerpicking but not so inspiring. I felt like, OK, I can hear the space but I would not choose that space for my performance. I think this reverb would've been great with some 3d stage positioning like MIR...
This is 2013 and I was hoping that by this time somebody should've designed a loadable 3d stages where I can place my instruments and then add an auditorium of any desirable size ...and maybe even place some ghosts of an utterly captivated audience into it. In other words, something totally intuitive.
@Stian,
Can you please elaborate a bit more about the Verberate? What are the demo limitations?
I auditioned other suggestions in this thread and once again reverbs such as c2 and b2 are way too effected (effect-sy). Definitely not my cup of tea.
X-Verb is on the other hand is a bit of a surprise. Not that it is totally unobtrusive but it has some very pleasant vibe and it is flexible enough for my needs. I'd consider it if it was around $100 but closer to $200 I think
Phoenix looks much more appealing.
EAReverb is also seem to be good but I had a feel that there was something stiff about it. By all accounts, I should've liked it and it did sound good on my acoustic fingerpicking but not so inspiring. I felt like, OK, I can hear the space but I would not choose that space for my performance. I think this reverb would've been great with some 3d stage positioning like MIR...
This is 2013 and I was hoping that by this time somebody should've designed a loadable 3d stages where I can place my instruments and then add an auditorium of any desirable size ...and maybe even place some ghosts of an utterly captivated audience into it. In other words, something totally intuitive.
@Stian,
Can you please elaborate a bit more about the Verberate? What are the demo limitations?
www.montrealserai.com
Montreal Serai-featuring diverse arts; poems; essays, cinema & music reviews, coverage of alternative media
Montreal Serai-featuring diverse arts; poems; essays, cinema & music reviews, coverage of alternative media
-
Arrested Developer Arrested Developer https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=278287
- KVRian
- 677 posts since 8 Apr, 2012
I would love to see Michael Carnes doing such a reverb (or just adding positioning features to Phoenix...)Tapehead wrote: This is 2013 and I was hoping that by this time somebody should've designed a loadable 3d stages where I can place my instruments and then add an auditorium of any desirable size ...and maybe even place some ghosts of an utterly captivated audience into it. In other words, something totally intuitive.
- KVRAF
- 5530 posts since 26 Apr, 2007 from Noosphere
Hi Sean! Do you have any plans to add "more transparent" algorithm to VRoom?valhallasound wrote:I haven't heard a plugin reverb that is more transparent than Phoenix. It is clearly (to my ears) descended from the Lexicon lineage, but it has none of the "thickness" of the old hardware. Instead, it has a clear sound, without being bland. As a reverb developer, I'm REALLY impressed with Phoenix. It seems like the perfect candidate for your stated goals.
Sean Costello
- KVRAF
- 3426 posts since 15 Nov, 2006 from Pacific NW
Nope. I might add other algorithms to ValhallaRoom, but they will sound like ValhallaRoom algorithms.Igro wrote:Hi Sean! Do you have any plans to add "more transparent" algorithm to VRoom?valhallasound wrote:I haven't heard a plugin reverb that is more transparent than Phoenix. It is clearly (to my ears) descended from the Lexicon lineage, but it has none of the "thickness" of the old hardware. Instead, it has a clear sound, without being bland. As a reverb developer, I'm REALLY impressed with Phoenix. It seems like the perfect candidate for your stated goals.
Sean Costello
-
Arrested Developer Arrested Developer https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=278287
- KVRian
- 677 posts since 8 Apr, 2012
Yes, but i have to deal with the way their rooms/halls sound.bill45 wrote:I think vienna MIR lets you place your instruments.
It's great from a technical point of view, but i miss the magic...
-
- KVRian
- 1401 posts since 9 Feb, 2012
Tapehead: I went back and read your original post. I also went through most of the reverbs I mentioned with an emphasis on non-effect sounds. I think Phoenix is what you're after that's available as a native plug-in. That is, if it works for you. There are two that I forgot to mention: Virsyn Reflect and the Sonnox Oxford Reverb. Reflect is probably too effect-y, and the Sonnox is a weird one, but it can evoke a particular sense of space. I suppose the upcoming surround version of phoenixverb might be better positioning-wise, even in stereo. Honestly, you can do a lot the old-fashioned way by pan matching for L-R placement, and send amount for depth/distance.
WEASEL: World Electro-Acoustic Sound Excitation Laboratories
- KVRian
- 1473 posts since 1 Jan, 2005 from Norway
Thanks for the interest!Tapehead wrote:Can you please elaborate a bit more about the Verberate? What are the demo limitations?
http://acondigital.com/audio/Verberate_ ... ll_M-S.wav
You can measure the impulse responses of other reverb plug-ins easily using a dirac pulse (simply apply reverb (all wet) to this file and normalize): http://acondigital.com/audio/Dirac_M.wav
Most digital reverbs don't come close to real measurements, which is not necessarily bad, but not realistic. Artistically spoken, reverbs without the sufficient density and realistic early reflections don't blend in, but sound "on top".
Please bear in mind, that Verberate is a true stereo processor, so a four channel impulse response would be required for a faithful reproduction using a convolution reverb, modulations set aside.
Stian
