New m/s workflow, handling
-
- KVRian
- 1297 posts since 23 Sep, 2008 from Germany
Hi Vojtech,
hope your work on v8 is going straight forward. Is it possible to integrate a new m/s workflow to your plugs, e.g. eqs. If I understand your m/s workflow until now, you need 2 plugins for mid and side changes. Maybe you can integrate this in one plugin like in Waves heq.
Thanks and greetings
Marek
hope your work on v8 is going straight forward. Is it possible to integrate a new m/s workflow to your plugs, e.g. eqs. If I understand your m/s workflow until now, you need 2 plugins for mid and side changes. Maybe you can integrate this in one plugin like in Waves heq.
Thanks and greetings
Marek
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- 14325 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
Hi Marek,
sorry, not that won't be possible. It is already there in dynamic equalizers though. In other equalizers it will not be added.
sorry, not that won't be possible. It is already there in dynamic equalizers though. In other equalizers it will not be added.
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- 14325 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
Yes it is! Dynamic eq's can process separate channels by each band, check band settings.
-
- KVRist
- 266 posts since 18 Oct, 2005
You don't usually advertise this Vojtech, but it's good it's there. I love the mid/side feature without using several instances. I wonder why it's not possible to implement in the other EQs though.MeldaProduction wrote:Yes it is! Dynamic eq's can process separate channels by each band, check band settings.
::
Mads
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- 14325 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
Of course it's possible, it just won't happen as it is too much work we can spend on something more useful
. After all, I'm currently considering MAutoDynamicEq as the most versatile eq on the market, hence a to-do eq, so why would we do that for the free equalizer for example???? 
-
- KVRist
- 266 posts since 18 Oct, 2005
I can understand why you won't implement it in the free EQ, that said mid-side is a function I would love to have in all good eq'sMeldaProduction wrote:Of course it's possible, it just won't happen as it is too much work we can spend on something more useful. After all, I'm currently considering MAutoDynamicEq as the most versatile eq on the market, hence a to-do eq, so why would we do that for the free equalizer for example????
::
Mads
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- 14325 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
Well, it is in all eqs, in fact in almost all plugins! Just not per-band. Sorry, time is limited, I need to focus on more important thing or we'll never move forward.
-
- KVRist
- 266 posts since 18 Oct, 2005
You are the Melda man - the master of all decisions - good and badMeldaProduction wrote:Well, it is in all eqs, in fact in almost all plugins! Just not per-band. Sorry, time is limited, I need to focus on more important thing or we'll never move forward.
::
Mads
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- 14325 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
