A Repository: Thinking about hosting freeware vsti's on my site.
-
- KVRAF
- 7925 posts since 20 Jan, 2008
I've noticed that a lot of freeware dev sites are disappearing and highly usable vsti's are disappearing along with them.
I will not host:
-Illegal content
-Freeware that is available from the developers site (like OP-X free)
-Shareware
-Installers (Content will be zipped)
It will not be an upload site. I'll test everything I host first. I'm not looking for contributions (though suggestions are fine as long as you remember it's a suggestion not a mandate)
I will not host:
-Illegal content
-Freeware that is available from the developers site (like OP-X free)
-Shareware
-Installers (Content will be zipped)
It will not be an upload site. I'll test everything I host first. I'm not looking for contributions (though suggestions are fine as long as you remember it's a suggestion not a mandate)
- KVRAF
- 25849 posts since 20 Jan, 2008 from a star near where you are
A good initiative 
But wouldn't such a site already be in place with archive.org ?: https://archive.org/details/software
But wouldn't such a site already be in place with archive.org ?: https://archive.org/details/software
-
- KVRAF
- 35728 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
You would still need the ok from the dev i guess. Most user licenses forbid the download from sites other than the orginal dev's i believe.tapper mike wrote:I've noticed that a lot of freeware dev sites are disappearing and highly usable vsti's are disappearing along with them.
I will not host:
-Illegal content
-Freeware that is available from the developers site (like OP-X free)
-Shareware
-Installers (Content will be zipped)
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 7925 posts since 20 Jan, 2008
After looking at that site. There is a lot of junk to wade through and many are installers.
I'd kind of prefer the content on my site to limit itself to vsti's I like using rather then a scrap yard.
But thanks for the link nonetheless.
I'd kind of prefer the content on my site to limit itself to vsti's I like using rather then a scrap yard.
But thanks for the link nonetheless.
- KVRAF
- 2784 posts since 18 Apr, 2001
In most cases, permission from the dev will imply that you can only re-distribute in the original form that the dev used for distribution. Installing/unpacking and then re-zipping is (in most cases) not allowed.tapper mike wrote: -Installers (Content will be zipped)
CrimsonWarlock aka TechnoGremlin, Moved to Reason and Rack Extensions exclusively (from Reaper and VSTs) several years ago.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 7925 posts since 20 Jan, 2008
If the original zip or .dll was provided as such then there won't be a problem.
Dev's who release freeware don't have control over distribution by virtue of the fact that it's freeware.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software#Definition
Dev's who release freeware don't have control over distribution by virtue of the fact that it's freeware.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software#Definition
Freedom 1: The freedom to run the program for any purpose.
Freedom 2: The freedom to study how the program works, and change it to make it do what you wish.
Freedom 3: The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor.
Freedom 4: The freedom to improve the program, and release your improvements (and modified versions in general) to the public, so that the whole community benefits.
-
- KVRAF
- 1924 posts since 15 Oct, 2008 from Germany
Freeware (gratis software) is not the same as free software (software under a license that grants certain freedoms to the user). I'm very certain that only very, very few freeware plugins are actually free software.
- KVRAF
- 2117 posts since 24 Feb, 2004 from Germany
Thats wrong.tapper mike wrote:If the original zip or .dll was provided as such then there won't be a problem.
Dev's who release freeware don't have control over distribution by virtue of the fact that it's freeware.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software#Definition
Freedom 1: The freedom to run the program for any purpose.
Freedom 2: The freedom to study how the program works, and change it to make it do what you wish.
Freedom 3: The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor.
Freedom 4: The freedom to improve the program, and release your improvements (and modified versions in general) to the public, so that the whole community benefits.
Freeware ist not public domain is not open source.
I give away many plugins for free. But all rights remain to ME. This includes the right of the way how it is published and the right to draw it back from public at any time.
Thus for several reasons I am not allowing plugins to be hostet on other sites, and many other developers predetermine likewise.
- KVRAF
- 2784 posts since 18 Apr, 2001
This!WOK wrote:Freeware ist not public domain is not open source.
Also, freeware is not a legally defined term. Public Domain is legally defined and Open Source is defined by legal license models that govern the rights that are linked to that kind of release. In the case of 'freeware', the copyright holder has basically full control over the way it is released, re-distributed, and so on.
CrimsonWarlock aka TechnoGremlin, Moved to Reason and Rack Extensions exclusively (from Reaper and VSTs) several years ago.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 7925 posts since 20 Jan, 2008
Well so much for that idea.


