I once made a very broad, very basic, completely unarguable point on the forum, and Leo replied with a very strange response that didn't actually address the points/questions I raised.TheoM wrote:I think you have nailed it there stroker with the "basically a company wide immaturity". This was my problem with Reason.. Not the product, but the company. It's frustratingly difficult to have any sort of conversation with them where they will admit anything is less than perfect. Leo especially.
And he's not alone. I've noticed that a few Propellerheads employees cherry-pick which questions to respond to, and when they do respond to a question, they answer them in the most vanilla, vague, "so obvious you didn't need to bother posting that, and you didn't even answer the question!" way possible.
Just look at the recent forum fiasco, and their (lack of) tweets about it.
Well, we know it's not a rumor for U-he.TheoM wrote:Now if the *rumours* are true and RE sales are less than expected
Between the relatively small user base, the prohibitively restrictive GUI guidelines, the 30% off the top, and the SDK limitations, I don't know why anybody would develop rack extensions.
But third party support was never their number one priority. They just want to be able to get their products to market more quickly, and to be able to charge more for them.
A Reason update used to feature three new devices and cost $99. Now, those same features will probably cost about $250.
Also, if they need a quick burst of cash, they can just put one of their rack extensions on sale.