So the Propellerhead's forum is down. Post in here if you normally post there.
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
- KVRAF
- 2302 posts since 21 Mar, 2012 from Nom..nom.. YOUR MOM
Relax, Theo. No one is trying to make you look silly. I thought it was information worth reiterating is all.TheoM wrote:In other words, it doesn't make full use of virtual cores, as it doesn't use them for plugins.
I don't understand sometimes why people quote to try and make me look silly, i mean no disprespect, but i did use the word "full".
I know what it uses hyperthreaded cores for as they have explained it clearly. But it's pretty easy to see in a loaded reason project, by simply using a utility like istat, that you will see for example 80%, 5%, 70%, 2%, 75%, 3%, 81%, 4%
This is just an example, with the lower figures being the virtual cores.
Cubase, Logic, Live, S1, Pro tools
75%, 70%, 80%, 85%, 80%, 75%, 70%, 71%
For the record, I'm actually in agreement that RE's could use performance improvement. Simply utilizing SSE instructions would be a fantastic start.
Win 10 | Ableton Live 11 Suite | Reason 13 | i7 3770 @ 3.5 Ghz | 16 GB RAM | RME Babyface Pro| Akai MPC Live 3 & Akai Force | Roland System 8 | Roland TB-3 | Roland MX-1 | Dreadbox Typhon | Korg Minilogue XD
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
- KVRAF
- 2302 posts since 21 Mar, 2012 from Nom..nom.. YOUR MOM
Outstanding!TheoM wrote:I'm completely relaxed, honestly. I did not write that with even a modicum of aggravation. this is my new, very calm self
Win 10 | Ableton Live 11 Suite | Reason 13 | i7 3770 @ 3.5 Ghz | 16 GB RAM | RME Babyface Pro| Akai MPC Live 3 & Akai Force | Roland System 8 | Roland TB-3 | Roland MX-1 | Dreadbox Typhon | Korg Minilogue XD
-
- KVRAF
- 35671 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Actually they announced it wasn't an attack at all, but a precautionary measure to take down the forums. I'm wondering too though, i would've expected it to be up again after 3 weeks time...Numanoid wrote:Wow, it's like three weeks now since this thread was started, must have been one fierce attack
- KVRAF
- 25849 posts since 20 Jan, 2008 from a star near where you are
The forum could be gone for good based on the webpage statement:chk071 wrote:Actually they announced it wasn't an attack at all, but a precautionary measure to take down the forums. I'm wondering too though, i would've expected it to be up again after 3 weeks time...
Looks like they wish to utilize Facebook/Twitter for communication instead?In the light of these events, we have decided to take down the Propellerhead forums and right now it's unclear when and how we will bring them back.
As usual, you can find us and other Reason users on our social media channels. Join us there while we are looking into this problem.
-
- KVRist
- 139 posts since 24 Mar, 2012
But they are using the same SDK with the same limitations, features etc. I don't know what the SDK looks like, but wouldn't they provide Devs with info how to optimize REs to make sure they more efficient for the platform? Why keep info like this to themselves? I mean it would be beneficial for all. I am not accepting thats its because it their tech they can code better.TheoM wrote:But it's in house, like all their own INCLUDED re which are cpu efficient. Obviously no one can code an RE as efficiently as the people who created it. IMO of course.
-
- KVRist
- 82 posts since 23 Nov, 2013 from United States
The forum is not gone for good. Scottym is just putting the final touches on the redesign.Numanoid wrote:The forum could be gone for good based on the webpage statement:chk071 wrote:Actually they announced it wasn't an attack at all, but a precautionary measure to take down the forums. I'm wondering too though, i would've expected it to be up again after 3 weeks time...Looks like they wish to utilize Facebook/Twitter for communication instead?In the light of these events, we have decided to take down the Propellerhead forums and right now it's unclear when and how we will bring them back.
As usual, you can find us and other Reason users on our social media channels. Join us there while we are looking into this problem.
- KVRAF
- 2302 posts since 21 Mar, 2012 from Nom..nom.. YOUR MOM
Lunesis wrote:The forum is not gone for good. Scottym is just putting the final touches on the redesign.
Win 10 | Ableton Live 11 Suite | Reason 13 | i7 3770 @ 3.5 Ghz | 16 GB RAM | RME Babyface Pro| Akai MPC Live 3 & Akai Force | Roland System 8 | Roland TB-3 | Roland MX-1 | Dreadbox Typhon | Korg Minilogue XD
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
- KVRAF
- 25849 posts since 20 Jan, 2008 from a star near where you are
Designing some special filters that will repel any cat picture posted is of course delicate coding that needs the proper timeLunesis wrote:The forum is not gone for good. Scottym is just putting the final touches on the redesign.
-
- KVRist
- 220 posts since 16 Dec, 2006
I find it hard to believe that they have the same limitations as external devs. Most probably they have access to some private API's that are able to access stuff outside the RE's sandbox. That would be a normal thing to do. Just like Apple have lots of private API's on iOS that are not accessible for 3rd party app devs.krucial wrote:But they are using the same SDK with the same limitations, features etc. I don't know what the SDK looks like, but wouldn't they provide Devs with info how to optimize REs to make sure they more efficient for the platform? Why keep info like this to themselves? I mean it would be beneficial for all. I am not accepting thats its because it their tech they can code better.TheoM wrote:But it's in house, like all their own INCLUDED re which are cpu efficient. Obviously no one can code an RE as efficiently as the people who created it. IMO of course.