just pointing it out.
Analog Delay has Alzheimer's
-
- KVRer
- 18 posts since 5 Sep, 2002 from Dallas, TX
Can't remember settings for songs in Cubase SX 2.2
just pointing it out.
just pointing it out.
- KVRAF
- 25027 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
likewise in Tracktion (which is a shame, because
apart from that it's fantastic
) 
apart from that it's fantastic
-
- KVRian
- 626 posts since 29 Jul, 2003 from Paris - France
hi,
After trying it several times, I can't succeed in making it forget the presets,
however there are interaction between sync, delay, and max delay that some time leads to wrong values being restored when reloading a preset.
I won't maintain this one anymore in its state, but I am recoding it to be much cleaner than it is right now.
I should add for v2:
* a feedback path selector (ping-pong,paralelle...)
* more slots for presets
* highpass filter in the loop
* a (small) reverb.
cheers
remy
After trying it several times, I can't succeed in making it forget the presets,
however there are interaction between sync, delay, and max delay that some time leads to wrong values being restored when reloading a preset.
I won't maintain this one anymore in its state, but I am recoding it to be much cleaner than it is right now.
I should add for v2:
* a feedback path selector (ping-pong,paralelle...)
* more slots for presets
* highpass filter in the loop
* a (small) reverb.
cheers
remy
-
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 18 posts since 5 Sep, 2002 from Dallas, TX
awesome 
While we're at it, I've noticed that when turning the Max-Delay knob, it also turns the Delay knob at the same time for some reason
Awesome new features for v2. Have you considered an LFO on the filters?
While we're at it, I've noticed that when turning the Max-Delay knob, it also turns the Delay knob at the same time for some reason
Awesome new features for v2. Have you considered an LFO on the filters?
-
- KVRian
- 626 posts since 29 Jul, 2003 from Paris - France
it's because the delay is defined between [0:max delay]KiloWatts wrote: While we're at it, I've noticed that when turning the Max-Delay knob, it also turns the Delay knob at the same time for some reason
so the delay knob moves according to that.
IMO that was a mistake to have dependencies between parameters like that but having both great precision and great range always leads to difficult trade-off.
yep, but only if I manage to make it cpu cheap.KiloWatts wrote:Have you considered an LFO on the filters?
You don't want a cpu hog, isn't?
I need to work on the filter coefs computation for that.
cheers
remy
-
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 18 posts since 5 Sep, 2002 from Dallas, TX
Actually I don't mind, since I got my new 2.8Ghz.mdsp wrote: yep, but only if I manage to make it cpu cheap.
You don't want a cpu hog, isn't?
-
- KVRian
- 626 posts since 29 Jul, 2003 from Paris - France
yes but you'll always find a day where you'll want 10 instances of Analog Delay and 4 instances of your latest hardware emulation synth.
Add to that a compressor and an eq per channel and your favorite Sampler with a 1Go orchestra bank
and you'll find that maybe the LFO is too much for *that* song...
(me am jealous!)
cheers
remy
Add to that a compressor and an eq per channel and your favorite Sampler with a 1Go orchestra bank
and you'll find that maybe the LFO is too much for *that* song...
(me am jealous!)
cheers
remy
-
- KVRist
- 378 posts since 28 Jul, 2002 from Somewhere in between
-
- KVRian
- 626 posts since 29 Jul, 2003 from Paris - France
the knob behaviour should be linear in all hosts.amoebe wrote:I like the analog delay but I don't like the behaviour of the knobs. Could you please make them rotate while moving the mouse up and down?
that can be done.I'd also like to see a pointer on the big delay knob. I actually find it hard to read with only text on top.
cheers

