DCO Majic (wavetable inside)
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3817 posts since 8 Mar, 2006
Well, there are some hints scattered across this thread but to sum it up into a short list:
-from the start, DCO waves have a particular character to them. They can either sound sharp or blurry yet still solid.
-practically have 2 oscs into one, adding up to 8 "virtual" oscs, can be seen as a trade among quick access and x2 multiplication vs having more flexibility of setting up a fixed phase relationship every time you want a DCO sound (which takes time to program)
-waveforms are complex and give a alternative and smooth PWM sound once in PWM mode and richer superwave sound once in superwave mode.
-waveforms can be used with self-hard-sync to quickly make them more complex and if finetuned with the phase knob, you'll get like the equivalent of having 3 DCO waves into one (works well like that when tuning sync from say 0.5 to 11.8 ) (interesting to try tuning a perfect 5th sounding wave to same or another interval via sync tune)
-oscfx on these waveforms give different effects VS having 2 oscs in a phase relation with the same oscfx.
-etc
Combining all of these Zebra features results in new and cool sounds that tend to keep the sharp or smooth character better.
-from the start, DCO waves have a particular character to them. They can either sound sharp or blurry yet still solid.
-practically have 2 oscs into one, adding up to 8 "virtual" oscs, can be seen as a trade among quick access and x2 multiplication vs having more flexibility of setting up a fixed phase relationship every time you want a DCO sound (which takes time to program)
-waveforms are complex and give a alternative and smooth PWM sound once in PWM mode and richer superwave sound once in superwave mode.
-waveforms can be used with self-hard-sync to quickly make them more complex and if finetuned with the phase knob, you'll get like the equivalent of having 3 DCO waves into one (works well like that when tuning sync from say 0.5 to 11.8 ) (interesting to try tuning a perfect 5th sounding wave to same or another interval via sync tune)
-oscfx on these waveforms give different effects VS having 2 oscs in a phase relation with the same oscfx.
-etc
Combining all of these Zebra features results in new and cool sounds that tend to keep the sharp or smooth character better.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3817 posts since 8 Mar, 2006
- KVRAF
- 5223 posts since 20 Jul, 2010
Sounds really good! I've always been a fan of phase locked octaves and intervals (especially with square waves). Must have taken quite some planning to get the waves to flow into eachother. If you set a very slow LFO to scan around the entire table you get monster morphin' PWM sounds 
If I have a go at something like this, I'll try throwing in some triangle waves and big octave intervals. My plan is to use an additive synth to construct the waves and then build the resulting shape in Zebra.
EDIT: You get a more crisp digi sound if you turn, well... "crisp" on for the oscillator
If I have a go at something like this, I'll try throwing in some triangle waves and big octave intervals. My plan is to use an additive synth to construct the waves and then build the resulting shape in Zebra.
EDIT: You get a more crisp digi sound if you turn, well... "crisp" on for the oscillator
http://sendy.bandcamp.com/releases < My new album at Bandcamp! Now pay what you like!
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3817 posts since 8 Mar, 2006
Yeah, hopefully there will be another one with other waves that will perfectly compliment this one.
Not in the very near future that's for sure!
If you want to build the partials try the demo IL Harmor and/or LinPlug Spectral. They have some pretty cool pattern/edit options.
was on crisp while modeling... but decided it's a bit too "crisp" for the init patch ..anyway, the very high partials aren't so accurate anyway, did the best I could tho!
Not in the very near future that's for sure!
If you want to build the partials try the demo IL Harmor and/or LinPlug Spectral. They have some pretty cool pattern/edit options.
was on crisp while modeling... but decided it's a bit too "crisp" for the init patch ..anyway, the very high partials aren't so accurate anyway, did the best I could tho!
- KVRAF
- 5223 posts since 20 Jul, 2010
Kinda makes me feel sorry for most wavetable scanning synths. Where you get to choose between 90% of the wavetables which are arbitrary "collections of differently shaded buzzing" with no thought put into how the wavetables could be designed to exploit their underlying architecture or open up synthesis avenues. I get the impression most of the wavetables in Massive were just thrown together randomly - which has it's uses, but, yeah. Zebra and it's user created intelligent wavetables for the win!
http://sendy.bandcamp.com/releases < My new album at Bandcamp! Now pay what you like!
- KVRist
- 251 posts since 19 Dec, 2011 from Colorado
3ee,
Thanks for sharing your efforts! I will be exploring these soon.
Thanks for sharing your efforts! I will be exploring these soon.
- KVRist
- 329 posts since 13 Nov, 2013 from Charlotte, North Carolina
3ee, these sound fantastic! Thank you for sharing this. In the interest of getting the most out of your hard work, had a couple of questions (newb questions).
As for "superwave mode", do I get this by going from "single" to all 11 voices?
Not wanting to be a pain in the ass, so if there is somewhere I can go to get the answers, feel free to point me there...I just have not found the answers via google searches yet - maybe I am not searching on the right words.
Does this mean each wave has a sharp or blurry character, or does it depend on the OSC Invert-Phase Mod/Hard Sync/Reset settings?3ee wrote: -from the start, DCO waves have a particular character to them. They can either sound sharp or blurry yet still solid..
The selection patch had two OSCs, but the final init patch has only one active. Do I activate more OSCs to get the different sounds? Hope this is not a dumb question but I am still learning and have focused more on combining OSCs and filters so am not clear on this DCO stuff.3ee wrote:-practically have 2 oscs into one
As I understand it, to use PWM, I turn on "Invert" and then adjust the Phase knob to get PWM sounds. Also understand that this works with one or two OSCs (not sure about more than two). If this is not correct please help my understanding here.3ee wrote:-waveforms are complex and give a alternative and smooth PWM sound once in PWM mode and richer superwave sound once in superwave mode.
As for "superwave mode", do I get this by going from "single" to all 11 voices?
Not wanting to be a pain in the ass, so if there is somewhere I can go to get the answers, feel free to point me there...I just have not found the answers via google searches yet - maybe I am not searching on the right words.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3817 posts since 8 Mar, 2006
Your welcome, enjoy!clangorous wrote:3ee, these sound fantastic! Thank you for sharing this. In the interest of getting the most out of your hard work, had a couple of questions (newb questions).
They sound sharp or blurry. Take wave 14 and 16 for example. They both have the same set of harmonics yet one sounds sharp and the other blurry. One is better for bass and leads, monophonic stuff... and the other of poly or richer superwave/PWMDoes this mean each wave has a sharp or blurry character, or does it depend on the OSC Invert-Phase Mod/Hard Sync/Reset settings?
Basically, I modeled the resulting waves of 2 phase-locked OSCs into one wavetable (based on the selections), you don't need to activate any other OSC, theoretically they are 2 already inside OSC3.The selection patch had two OSCs, but the final init patch has only one active. Do I activate more OSCs to get the different sounds? Hope this is not a dumb question but I am still learning and have focused more on combining OSCs and filters so am not clear on this DCO stuff.
"DCO" = digitally controlled oscillator The selection patches are "useless" now
This may be already deduced from the answer above. simply turn on the "invert" PWM mode for OSC3 and adjust or modulate the phase parameter.As I understand it, to use PWM, I turn on "Invert" and then adjust the Phase knob to get PWM sounds. Also understand that this works with one or two OSCs (not sure about more than two). If this is not correct please help my understanding here.
As for "superwave mode", do I get this by going from "single" to all 11 voices?
Try dual and quad also.... Because the nature of the waves, PWM mode already gives "superwave" results so, in some cases you may not want the overkill of having 11 voices superwave mode into play but dual or quad instead.
Hope this answers your questions, if you have more, feel free to ask.
- KVRist
- 329 posts since 13 Nov, 2013 from Charlotte, North Carolina
You answered all my questions! This is a big help. Thanks so much 3ee.3ee wrote:Hope this answers your questions, if you have more, feel free to ask.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3817 posts since 8 Mar, 2006
-
aaron aardvark aaron aardvark https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=248508
- KVRAF
- 3082 posts since 22 Jan, 2011 from near Los Angeles
3ee,
Thank you for replying. I'm an engineer, but a lot of this wave stuff is above my head, but I have not spent loads of time tinkering with it.
Thank you for replying. I'm an engineer, but a lot of this wave stuff is above my head, but I have not spent loads of time tinkering with it.
You can hear my original music at this link: https://www.soundclick.com/artist/defau ... dID=224436
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3817 posts since 8 Mar, 2006
Hey all! 
I'm hard at work on my new Zebra patch bank based on the DCO waves.
Please go to this SoundCloud link:
...read the description there and leave feedback on the timeline.
Many thanks!
I'm hard at work on my new Zebra patch bank based on the DCO waves.
Please go to this SoundCloud link:
Code: Select all
http://soundcloud.com/3eesounddesign/battery-leak-crude-sketch/s-T8kgVMany thanks!
-
aaron aardvark aaron aardvark https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=248508
- KVRAF
- 3082 posts since 22 Jan, 2011 from near Los Angeles
Mr 3ee,
~1:40 & ~2:20 & ~2:30 & 3:20 & 5:30 were cool at times. For the first minute, were you zooming through patches really fast or adjusting a few patches here & there? I'm sure I'd put some effects on most of the ones I liked.
~1:40 & ~2:20 & ~2:30 & 3:20 & 5:30 were cool at times. For the first minute, were you zooming through patches really fast or adjusting a few patches here & there? I'm sure I'd put some effects on most of the ones I liked.
You can hear my original music at this link: https://www.soundclick.com/artist/defau ... dID=224436
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3817 posts since 8 Mar, 2006
^ Thanks for the feedback, will check it out!
1st 30 seconds or so, was just a quick switch of presets to get a glimpse of the sounds, than when I was going backwards presenting most patches in more detail.
All patches will be topped off with effects, usually saving that for last stages of progress. The patchbank as it is atm, it's about halfway done and by the end of the month should be scheduled for a release if all goes well.
1st 30 seconds or so, was just a quick switch of presets to get a glimpse of the sounds, than when I was going backwards presenting most patches in more detail.
All patches will be topped off with effects, usually saving that for last stages of progress. The patchbank as it is atm, it's about halfway done and by the end of the month should be scheduled for a release if all goes well.
