Only if you treat it with PaulStretch!Sendy wrote:Yeah, it's called ambient?Tricky-Loops wrote:
EDIT: Now that we have "slow food", maybe there will be "slow trance", too?
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
Only if you treat it with PaulStretch!Sendy wrote:Yeah, it's called ambient?Tricky-Loops wrote:
EDIT: Now that we have "slow food", maybe there will be "slow trance", too?
according to melody?stillshaded wrote:A good melody (often) implies a chord progression.
I'm afraid I don't follow you.Hink wrote:according to melody?stillshaded wrote:A good melody (often) implies a chord progression.
A melody that implies some sense of resolution does. The Beatles' Tomorrow Never Knows is all about not resolving.stillshaded wrote:A good melody (often) implies a chord progression.
I just listened to this, it has a chord progression. Just ask Bach, any time the bass is playing a different note from the melody, that's a chord. Most popular EDM has chord progressions of some sort, you're just not recognizing them as such because they're not chords on a single keyboard.Juljan wrote:I looked up some house music remakes on YouTube, for example Sebastian Ingrosso-Reload.
Tricky-Loops wrote:Most so called "chord progressions" consist of 4 (or more) chords. I've never seen any chord progression with 2 chords only...
If we're going to get technical, then literally speaking, at least with tonal music, a "progression" has to move towards the tonic according to the principles of functional harmony. So ii-V and V-I are both "progressions".hueynym wrote:A "Chord Progression" is when one chord goes to another chord. If you are composing diatonic music, regardless of genre, and use notes outside of a single chromatic scale, you are using a chord progression. It may be 2 chords going back and forth, it may be 4 chords. If it goes from one discernible chord to another, it's a progression.
Did you mean I-V as a "progression"? Otherwise, V-I moves in the other direction, too, as well as V-ii...JumpingJackFlash wrote:If we're going to get technical, then literally speaking, at least with tonal music, a "progression" has to move towards the tonic according to the principles of functional harmony. So ii-V and V-I are both "progressions".
V-ii on the other hand (for example) moves in the other direction and is therefore a "retrogression" instead. (The clue is in the names.)
Retrogressions are just a peculiar type of progression (essentially they're "standard" progressions in reverse and without cadences). I-V resolves way to strongly to really be a retrogression imho (retrogressions tend to have really weak resolutions).Tricky-Loops wrote:Did you mean I-V as a "progression"? Otherwise, V-I moves in the other direction, too, as well as V-ii...JumpingJackFlash wrote:If we're going to get technical, then literally speaking, at least with tonal music, a "progression" has to move towards the tonic according to the principles of functional harmony. So ii-V and V-I are both "progressions".
V-ii on the other hand (for example) moves in the other direction and is therefore a "retrogression" instead. (The clue is in the names.)
No, V-I moves towards the tonic as I said.Tricky-Loops wrote:Did you mean I-V as a "progression"? Otherwise, V-I moves in the other direction, too, as well as V-ii...
But then it's a cadence... Or is a cadence a progression?JumpingJackFlash wrote:No, V-I moves towards the tonic as I said.Tricky-Loops wrote:Did you mean I-V as a "progression"? Otherwise, V-I moves in the other direction, too, as well as V-ii...
Not every V-I is a cadence (or to put it another way, V-I is not necessarily a cadence).Tricky-Loops wrote:But then it's a cadence... Or is a cadence a progression?JumpingJackFlash wrote:No, V-I moves towards the tonic as I said.Tricky-Loops wrote:Did you mean I-V as a "progression"? Otherwise, V-I moves in the other direction, too, as well as V-ii...
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2024
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement