Bazille StackV vs Mapper?
- KVRAF
- 5913 posts since 17 Aug, 2004 from Berlin, Germany
I tried to use the StackV with Unison to control semitone of the stacks, this seems to work as expected. But my first idea was to use the mapper (random) and as source StackVoice and than use the Mapper to control the semitone...
What does StackV generate and which is the better method for detuning of unison osc?
What does StackV generate and which is the better method for detuning of unison osc?
| Links- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 5913 posts since 17 Aug, 2004 from Berlin, Germany
This is only static detuning. You need at least the mapper to have some random detuned voices if using stacks (Alternate or MapSmooth).
But Bazille has also StackV (Stack Voltage?) which seems to have a similar effect but I'm not sure what StackV generates and so my question.
But Bazille has also StackV (Stack Voltage?) which seems to have a similar effect but I'm not sure what StackV generates and so my question.
| Links- KVRAF
- 4197 posts since 23 May, 2004 from Bad Vilbel, Germany
Pretty sure I described StackV etc. well enough in the manual.
BTW StackV = "Stack Voice".
BTW StackV = "Stack Voice".
- KVRAF
- 27000 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
For example, assign StackV to filter cutoff. Then set the knob to +10... with unison stack of 3, the 3 individual voices will be -10, 0, +10 for cutoff... apply accordingly to any parameter4damind wrote:This is only static detuning. You need at least the mapper to have some random detuned voices if using stacks (Alternate or MapSmooth).
But Bazille has also StackV (Stack Voltage?) which seems to have a similar effect but I'm not sure what StackV generates and so my question.
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 5913 posts since 17 Aug, 2004 from Berlin, Germany
