u-he

whyterabbyt · Post by **whyterabbyt** » Thu Oct 09, 2014 10:47 pm

chilly7 wrote:Thank u Urs. I will cheak that stuff. I just downloaded a demo.
P.s.
1) But no metter how far u claimbed a hill, do not stop and sey i am a king, just move higher and fester as if u did nothing!!!
2) Quality is first quanity is only if u make no compromise with quality!!!

Its quite remarkable watching this level of manifestation of the Dunning-Kruger effect combine itself with so much naively misplaced condescension.

BBFG# · Post by **BBFG#** » Thu Oct 09, 2014 11:16 pm

whyterabbyt wrote: Its quite remarkable watching this level of manifestation of the Dunning-Kruger effect combine itself with so much naively misplaced condescension.

Erkenfresh · Post by **Erkenfresh** » Fri Oct 10, 2014 1:26 am

If you could represent sound as something other than a waveform, then yeah maybe you're on to something. But with the way physics tends to work, sound being the compression/expansion of air, I don't know that there's really a way around it. If you could translate a picture of a pig into sound for example, that might actually be pretty cool.

BasariStudios · Post by **BasariStudios** » Fri Oct 10, 2014 2:24 am

BBFG# wrote:That's more relative to Planck's Constant than Paradoxical Entanglement.
But at least you can add a wobble knob without tearing the continuum.

I wish Q was here...

bmrzycki · Post by **bmrzycki** » Fri Oct 10, 2014 3:38 am

BasariStudios wrote:I wish Q was here...

Frantz · Post by **Frantz** » Fri Oct 10, 2014 3:58 am

Sendy wrote:Why don't we simulate a virtual world, then create sound by reading atoms along certain lines in spacetime in that world to decide whether the waveform should go up, down, or stay the same.

When you "simulate a virtual world," do you get a virtual virtual world?

Could sound exist in a virtual world? If a tree falls in a forest...

thetechnobear · Post by **thetechnobear** » Fri Oct 10, 2014 9:23 am

whyterabbyt wrote:Its quite remarkable watching this level of manifestation of the Dunning-Kruger effect combine itself with so much naively misplaced condescension.

chilly7 · Post by **chilly7** » Fri Oct 10, 2014 1:02 pm

BasariStudios wrote:http://www.eisenberg-audio.de/einklang

Try that.

Thank u i will take a look.

BBFG# · Post by **BBFG#** » Fri Oct 10, 2014 4:53 pm

bmrzycki wrote:
BasariStudios wrote:I wish Q was here...

The look on his face here begs the question....
Is he drinking his own bodily fluid?

BBFG# · Post by **BBFG#** » Fri Oct 10, 2014 4:56 pm

chilly7 wrote:
BasariStudios wrote:http://www.eisenberg-audio.de/einklang

Try that.
Thank u i will take a look.

It's a quirky little thing that seems worth the price for something interesting. But I wonder why the sounds cost more than the synth itself?

chilly7 · Post by **chilly7** » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:06 pm

BBFG# wrote:
chilly7 wrote:
BasariStudios wrote:http://www.eisenberg-audio.de/einklang

Try that.
Thank u i will take a look.
It's a quirky little thing that seems worth the price for something interesting. But I wonder why the sounds cost more than the synth itself?

Why u ask me?!

U should ask developers, and let us know.

BBFG# · Post by **BBFG#** » Fri Oct 10, 2014 7:17 pm

chilly7 wrote:
BBFG# wrote:
chilly7 wrote:
BasariStudios wrote:http://www.eisenberg-audio.de/einklang
Try that.
Thank u i will take a look.
It's a quirky little thing that seems worth the price for something interesting. But I wonder why the sounds cost more than the synth itself?
Why u ask me?!
U should ask developers, and let us know.

Just because you were in the conversation doesn't mean it was directed at you specifically. Or in fact, was anything more than rhetorical. Take it as personally as you feel you need to. But no, I wasn't asking you, because I know fully well it was nothing you could answer or even needed answering.

Sendy · Post by **Sendy** » Fri Oct 10, 2014 9:27 pm

Frantz wrote:
Sendy wrote:Why don't we simulate a virtual world, then create sound by reading atoms along certain lines in spacetime in that world to decide whether the waveform should go up, down, or stay the same.
When you "simulate a virtual world," do you get a virtual virtual world?

Could sound exist in a virtual world? If a tree falls in a forest...

If you do it well enough, yes - the simulated people would eventually start to create and run simulations, creating an endless infinite regress of simulations.

Would sound in such a simulation actually be sound? If detected by any of the conscious beings and "heard" by them, I like to think that, in the context of the simulation, yes.

Whether any of this is actually possible in whatever future unfolds for us is obviously massively debatable. I tend to think it isn't. I think there's something about reality and consciousness which transcends computation. But I'm open to being wrong and I find the ideas fascinating. And when you think about the possible paradigm shifts that could come in the fields of computing, physics, etc... Let's just say I like to stay open-minded

Imagine if we worked out that WE were living in a simulation - and worse - we were part of a VST plugin and only exist indirectly to create silly sounds for throwaway musical artifacts. The entirety of human struggle and suffering for a few wubs

xh3rv · Post by **xh3rv** » Fri Oct 10, 2014 10:21 pm

Any synths out there do really good metaphysical modeling?

Frantz · Post by **Frantz** » Fri Oct 10, 2014 10:30 pm

Sendy wrote: Would sound in such a simulation actually be sound? If detected by any of the conscious beings and "heard" by them, I like to think that, in the context of the simulation, yes.

Agreed.

Sendy wrote: I think there's something about reality and consciousness which transcends computation.

I don't see why the wetware of our brains couldn't eventually be simulated.

Sendy wrote: Imagine if we worked out that WE were living in a simulation

A blue screen of death could kill us all.

u-he

KVR Audio

Is there really anything new in digital world which was never existed before?!!