There you go4damind wrote:And now.. build a song around it
https://app.box.com/shared/static/zm9bi ... q2d37r.mp3
There you go4damind wrote:And now.. build a song around it
Very true, DX7 was thought of as cold and different for the synths that came before it.zerocrossing wrote:I think that's partially true.deastman wrote:I'm reading all these negative comments about the sound quality, and it just doesn't jibe with my own experience. Here's what I think (and please feel free to disagree!): I think wavetable synths, and also most additive synths, make it very easy to add a whole lot of upper harmonics. Doing so tends to de-emphasize the fundamental and first few harmonics. The result is a perceived thinness or harshness. Considerable care is required when creating patches on these kinds of synths, so that the upper frequencies don't overwhelm the lower partials.![]()
![]()
Ah, I crack myself up. But seriously, we've talked about digital synths being "cold" since DX7 days. Guitar amps since transistor days. I'm sure pianos are talked about in such a way as well. Funny, I was just in a thread on Gearslutz where someone described the DX7s "warmth" compared to software. It's all relative I guess. Anyway, I mentioned some techniques to warm and beef up Serum's sound that work really well but aren't very apparent in the presets.
Listen to Codex though, with the same wavetable and basic filter settings. It's a totally different sound. It's as if the designers at Waves said, "no one would ever want that kind of harshness, let's make sure it doesn't happen." So, you lose flexibility on one hand, but on the other you have a more instantly likable sound.
I hear this a lot in software instruments. Some sound very "cold" and "clinical" to me. (I don't like to use the word "thin" on a synth capable of such bass as Serum) NI synths, including Massive, come to mind. I remember thinking Tone2's Saurus and Nemesis were cold, where Diva and Toxic biohazard were warm. I don't think of it as a value judgement though, just like I don't judge a hot cup of coffee against a glass of iced tea. Both have places in my world.
"Your Box account may be temporarily unavailable"db3 wrote:There you go4damind wrote:And now.. build a song around it
https://app.box.com/shared/static/zm9bi ... q2d37r.mp3
| LinksThere is a folder in the LFO section that has lots of LFO presets including sign waves.zeep wrote:What is the best way to make a simple sinewave shape LFO for say Vibrato?
Also, just something i thought i'd mention. Probably a known / normal thing. If you use Unison in i.e. OSC B, and then turn off OSC B, it still uses CPU.
As SLiC mentioned, there's a button in the LFO section to browse shapes.zeep wrote:What is the best way to make a simple sinewave shape LFO for say Vibrato?

The oscillators sound fine to me, it's the filters that sound cold and thin. The gain staging for the filter resonance saturation just isn't very good, so they sound weak when using a lot of resonance.PatchAdamz wrote:Very true, DX7 was thought of as cold and different for the synths that came before it.zerocrossing wrote:I think that's partially true.deastman wrote:I'm reading all these negative comments about the sound quality, and it just doesn't jibe with my own experience. Here's what I think (and please feel free to disagree!): I think wavetable synths, and also most additive synths, make it very easy to add a whole lot of upper harmonics. Doing so tends to de-emphasize the fundamental and first few harmonics. The result is a perceived thinness or harshness. Considerable care is required when creating patches on these kinds of synths, so that the upper frequencies don't overwhelm the lower partials.![]()
![]()
Ah, I crack myself up. But seriously, we've talked about digital synths being "cold" since DX7 days. Guitar amps since transistor days. I'm sure pianos are talked about in such a way as well. Funny, I was just in a thread on Gearslutz where someone described the DX7s "warmth" compared to software. It's all relative I guess. Anyway, I mentioned some techniques to warm and beef up Serum's sound that work really well but aren't very apparent in the presets.
Listen to Codex though, with the same wavetable and basic filter settings. It's a totally different sound. It's as if the designers at Waves said, "no one would ever want that kind of harshness, let's make sure it doesn't happen." So, you lose flexibility on one hand, but on the other you have a more instantly likable sound.
I hear this a lot in software instruments. Some sound very "cold" and "clinical" to me. (I don't like to use the word "thin" on a synth capable of such bass as Serum) NI synths, including Massive, come to mind. I remember thinking Tone2's Saurus and Nemesis were cold, where Diva and Toxic biohazard were warm. I don't think of it as a value judgement though, just like I don't judge a hot cup of coffee against a glass of iced tea. Both have places in my world.
Of course, it ended up a classic, outselling ALL synths that came before it.
I think Serums Strength is its ability to do clean sounds, dark sounds, bright sounds, classic sounds etc.
It is not confined to simply one sonic characteristic.
That what makes it such a great synth, the type of sound it gets, are based on the type of sound the programmer wants.
It allows a choice, many choices actually, and more so then the average synth.
Thanks for the help. I saved the sine wave shape from PD Ethereal Compass now.Skyre wrote:As SLiC mentioned, there's a button in the LFO section to browse shapes.zeep wrote:What is the best way to make a simple sinewave shape LFO for say Vibrato?
The default sine isn't a perfect sine shape, though. I recall Steve wanting to include a better one back in the day, must've forgotten about it.
Here's a quick screeny of how to draw a more accurate shape for the time being:
You can also grab it from my preset 'PD Ethereal Compass' and save as a custom shape. (Hmm...I had macros for that preset, think I gave him an old version)
Quick tip if you're not aware - holding Alt while dragging curves will adjust all curves equally, which is sweet for creating sines. =]
Well, which filters specifically sound thin?blackflag wrote:The oscillators sound fine to me, it's the filters that sound cold and thin. The gain staging for the filter resonance saturation just isn't very good, so they sound weak when using a lot of resonance.PatchAdamz wrote:Very true, DX7 was thought of as cold and different for the synths that came before it.zerocrossing wrote:I think that's partially true.deastman wrote:I'm reading all these negative comments about the sound quality, and it just doesn't jibe with my own experience. Here's what I think (and please feel free to disagree!): I think wavetable synths, and also most additive synths, make it very easy to add a whole lot of upper harmonics. Doing so tends to de-emphasize the fundamental and first few harmonics. The result is a perceived thinness or harshness. Considerable care is required when creating patches on these kinds of synths, so that the upper frequencies don't overwhelm the lower partials.![]()
![]()
Ah, I crack myself up. But seriously, we've talked about digital synths being "cold" since DX7 days. Guitar amps since transistor days. I'm sure pianos are talked about in such a way as well. Funny, I was just in a thread on Gearslutz where someone described the DX7s "warmth" compared to software. It's all relative I guess. Anyway, I mentioned some techniques to warm and beef up Serum's sound that work really well but aren't very apparent in the presets.
Listen to Codex though, with the same wavetable and basic filter settings. It's a totally different sound. It's as if the designers at Waves said, "no one would ever want that kind of harshness, let's make sure it doesn't happen." So, you lose flexibility on one hand, but on the other you have a more instantly likable sound.
I hear this a lot in software instruments. Some sound very "cold" and "clinical" to me. (I don't like to use the word "thin" on a synth capable of such bass as Serum) NI synths, including Massive, come to mind. I remember thinking Tone2's Saurus and Nemesis were cold, where Diva and Toxic biohazard were warm. I don't think of it as a value judgement though, just like I don't judge a hot cup of coffee against a glass of iced tea. Both have places in my world.
Of course, it ended up a classic, outselling ALL synths that came before it.
I think Serums Strength is its ability to do clean sounds, dark sounds, bright sounds, classic sounds etc.
It is not confined to simply one sonic characteristic.
That what makes it such a great synth, the type of sound it gets, are based on the type of sound the programmer wants.
It allows a choice, many choices actually, and more so then the average synth.
I'm not having much luck today4damind wrote:"Your Box account may be temporarily unavailable"db3 wrote:There you go4damind wrote:And now.. build a song around it![]()
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026