Per note automation
-
- Banned
- 289 posts since 26 Sep, 2014
Hi. I was just wondering what the chances are of you adding per note automation support in your synths? I'm talking about Bitwig, where you can apply pitch bends to each note in a chord. It only works with their built in plugins at the moment, and their synth is quite limited in comparison to yours.
It would be a truly awesome feature, any chances of this ever happening?
Thanks.
It would be a truly awesome feature, any chances of this ever happening?
Thanks.
- KVRAF
- 24455 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
Polyphonic aftertouch is already supported, if each polyphony note is sent over a different MIDI channel (so, up to 16 voices).
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 289 posts since 26 Sep, 2014
Ah, so I could use the aftertouch as a modulation source? But how would this work if I'm writing a chord progression in midi?
Bitwig doesn't support midi routing yet, but that should change in the next few days. Would I need to use separate midi tracks?
What I'm looking to do is use subtle detuning on chords. I was reading a deadmau5 interview, and he reckons that some of his sound comes from the inaccuracies of the hardware synths he uses, as they rely on voltage to adjust pitch.
Bitwig doesn't support midi routing yet, but that should change in the next few days. Would I need to use separate midi tracks?
What I'm looking to do is use subtle detuning on chords. I was reading a deadmau5 interview, and he reckons that some of his sound comes from the inaccuracies of the hardware synths he uses, as they rely on voltage to adjust pitch.
- KVRAF
- 24455 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
Dunno about Bitwig. Can't each clip hold 16 MIDI channels in it, then you'd just select a different channel and tweak your poly AT there?
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 289 posts since 26 Sep, 2014
I'm not sure, I'll check it out. I don't think so tbh, it's in fairly early stages at the moment.
- KVRAF
- 4197 posts since 23 May, 2004 from Bad Vilbel, Germany
u-he synths also understand regular polyphonic aftertouch (i.e. using just one MIDI channel) - just make sure that the plugin receives poly-AT before it sees any channel-AT.EvilDragon wrote:Polyphonic aftertouch is already supported, if each polyphony note is sent over a different MIDI channel (so, up to 16 voices).
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 289 posts since 26 Sep, 2014
Sorry, I don't follow. Could you explain a bit more?Howard wrote:just make sure that the plugin receives poly-AT before it sees any channel-AT.
- KVRAF
- 4141 posts since 11 Aug, 2006 from Texas
Polyphonic aftertouch and channel pressure (confusingly called aftertouch by many people and companies) send different MIDI messages. The polyphonic aftertouch message format:Eta Carinae wrote:Sorry, I don't follow. Could you explain a bit more?Howard wrote:just make sure that the plugin receives poly-AT before it sees any channel-AT.
Code: Select all
0xAn 0xk 0xvCompare to channel pressure:
Code: Select all
0xBn 0xvIt sounds like Howard is aware that u-he synths are coded to switch to channel pressure if the synth sees any midi messages starting with 0xB.
So don't mix your aftertouch types and you'll be just fine.
- KVRAF
- 26995 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
Bazille already supports note per midi channel (works in Traction and Eigen D)... I assume the other synths do too.Eta Carinae wrote:Hi. I was just wondering what the chances are of you adding per note automation support in your synths? I'm talking about Bitwig, where you can apply pitch bends to each note in a chord. It only works with their built in plugins at the moment, and their synth is quite limited in comparison to yours.
It would be a truly awesome feature, any chances of this ever happening?
Thanks.
Bitwig is its own special case and I guess that they will have to do something on their side before U-he synths would work with it.
-
- KVRian
- 537 posts since 18 Jul, 2006
VST 3.5 should be the answer but it seems complicated to implement. Until developers or Steinberg make the effort to make the new standard widespread, per note automation will remain mostly DAW specific.
- KVRAF
- 26995 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
Hell with Steinberg. They have no incentive to do that so better not wait for it.GHOST19 wrote:VST 3.5 should be the answer but it seems complicated to implement. Until developers or Steinberg make the effort to make the new standard widespread, per note automation will remain mostly DAW specific.
