Which is why I don't bother basing my assessment of a synth on the presets. If you have even a limited background in designing your own sounds, and even a rudimentary understanding of technology, you don't need to hear presets to understand how specific technology limits or enhances the capabilities of a synth with respect to the sounds that you're interested in.BBFG# wrote:It unfortunately becomes circular at that point too.recursive one wrote: And also it may be that Sylenth is pigeonholed as an "EDM synth" while EDM is pigeonholed as "cookie-cutter music for unimaginative people", therefore serious guys are ready to write off anything labelled as "Sylenth successor".
While EDM is what it is, Sylenth is still a good sounding synth, therefore the expectations for the sound quaility of its (alleged) succesor are also very high.
So many of the sounds you hear for it are EDM and so it gets looked over by others for being able to do anything else. Certainly it can as the vast majority of the synths have much more range than their pigeon hole ubiquity ever imagines. That is why it's important for the developer to start that with a larger range in their demos. And the Sylenth site is a flood of demos all geared to... EDM. I can hear more in its characteristics than EDM, but it's hard getting past the fact that, unless you doing the programming yourself, you're going to have to swim an ocean of bad EDM patches to find those gems that make the synth shine. So it is the MaryMollySpice kids doing EDM that kills it and the developers that cater to that only have themselves to blame.
EDM stands for 'Education Doesn't Matter' - right? (Or is it 'Everyone's Doing Molly')?
I'm rarely surprised. I was a bit surprised by Bazille because I never got into PD synthesis way back when and I hadn't really explored it much in any of the plugins that I have that support it in some way.
