I have a new logo and I want your opinion!
-
- KVRer
- 28 posts since 6 Jul, 2014 from Southampton, Hampshire, UK
I have developed my new logo a lot and I think I may have found a finish point or at least seen the light at the end of the tunnel.
Here is the Image and please give constructive critisism and/or your own opinion so I can improve it.
Before you do so, I am an Electronic Dance Music Producer, therefore I made it fit to what I am doing by the modern look with the modern genre etc...
There is a plain proof image along with the final overall logo with the background etc...
https://twitter.com/OFFICIALGRIEF3R/sta ... 48/photo/1
Even if you don't/can't comment back, I thank you for your consideration of taking your time to read this post.
Cheers,
GRIEF3R | Mathew Vaughan
Here is the Image and please give constructive critisism and/or your own opinion so I can improve it.
Before you do so, I am an Electronic Dance Music Producer, therefore I made it fit to what I am doing by the modern look with the modern genre etc...
There is a plain proof image along with the final overall logo with the background etc...
https://twitter.com/OFFICIALGRIEF3R/sta ... 48/photo/1
Even if you don't/can't comment back, I thank you for your consideration of taking your time to read this post.
Cheers,
GRIEF3R | Mathew Vaughan
- KVRAF
- 2398 posts since 10 Jul, 2006 from Tampa
The logo looks nice, but without knowing what it's supposed to represent, it's hard to say if it captures the "image" you intended. For example, what do the red "E"s represent?
Otherwise, it does look nice!
Steve
EDIT: After reading that your name was "GRIEF3R", I thought I'd add that the logo doesn't necessarily represent the second "E" as a "3", the way your name is spelled. When I first read it, I read "Griefer", and while it made sense as a word, I still didn't quite get the "E"s. Now that I see that one of the "E"s should be a "3", I'm a bit more concerned that the logo--while still nice-looking--may not represent your overall image the way you want.
I hope that helps a bit.
Steve
Otherwise, it does look nice!
Steve
EDIT: After reading that your name was "GRIEF3R", I thought I'd add that the logo doesn't necessarily represent the second "E" as a "3", the way your name is spelled. When I first read it, I read "Griefer", and while it made sense as a word, I still didn't quite get the "E"s. Now that I see that one of the "E"s should be a "3", I'm a bit more concerned that the logo--while still nice-looking--may not represent your overall image the way you want.
I hope that helps a bit.
Steve
Here's some of my stuff: https://soundcloud.com/shadowsoflife. If you hear something you like, I'm looking for collaborators.
-
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 28 posts since 6 Jul, 2014 from Southampton, Hampshire, UK
I think I might experiment with only having the 2nd 'E' as red to indicate it as the '3'.
Either way, thank you A LOT for the feedback, I highly appreciate it!
GRIEF3R | Mathew Vaughan
Either way, thank you A LOT for the feedback, I highly appreciate it!
GRIEF3R | Mathew Vaughan
-
- KVRAF
- 2065 posts since 14 Sep, 2004 from $HOME
Looks modern, so one of your goals is achieved.
Is the white space around that logo part of it? If so, I'd put some space left and right with the amount of the space between the single letters. And maybe remove some of the upper and lower wife space. If not, ignore
Also, for me the F looks a bit funny because of the length of the upper line, it creates a lot of space at the bottom, looks like a hole there. Maybe try shortening the upper line a bit, don't know whether that'll work but worth a try. Or maybe put the whole logo in a black bordered box to stabilize it?
Very minor point, though and maybe purely subjective.
Is the white space around that logo part of it? If so, I'd put some space left and right with the amount of the space between the single letters. And maybe remove some of the upper and lower wife space. If not, ignore
Also, for me the F looks a bit funny because of the length of the upper line, it creates a lot of space at the bottom, looks like a hole there. Maybe try shortening the upper line a bit, don't know whether that'll work but worth a try. Or maybe put the whole logo in a black bordered box to stabilize it?
Very minor point, though and maybe purely subjective.
-
- KVRAF
- 1924 posts since 24 Apr, 2010
The one on soundcloud is the original ? That's the dogs bollocks ! So I've decided not to give my opinion on the logo on twitter.
-
fluffy_little_something fluffy_little_something https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=281847
- Banned
- 12880 posts since 5 Jun, 2012
I would not want the word grief in my logo
Except maybe if I had a funeral service 
-
- KVRAF
- 3959 posts since 10 Sep, 2010 from A shit hole (Ireland).
I think it looks modern. Black and red you can't really go wrong there. I'm unclear what the e's represent or bars. Are they red for a reason or is that purely aesthetic?
I'm not too mad on the font tbh, it's a bit cluttered, and at a smaller size it would be hard to read. I think you could space the letters out a bit further. There's virtually no negative space between each letter.
I'm not too mad on the font tbh, it's a bit cluttered, and at a smaller size it would be hard to read. I think you could space the letters out a bit further. There's virtually no negative space between each letter.
I will take the Lord's name in vain, whenever I want. Hail Satan! And his little goblins too. 
- KVRAF
- 1987 posts since 29 Apr, 2010 from NYC
ummm....i guess its fine. im not sure it really says anything...other than your name of course. im not a fan of logos that are just the name written out anyway. i prefer symbols as logos (as you might be able to tell), but thats personal opinion. this logo looks pretty standard to me and i dont get any kind of message from it.
from wiki: "[a logo] requires a clear idea about the concept and values of the brand as well as understanding of the consumer or target group."
grief3r comes across more like a gamer handle than a music project...but again...thats just my opinion.
its not a "bad" logo...just seems pretty ordinary.
from wiki: "[a logo] requires a clear idea about the concept and values of the brand as well as understanding of the consumer or target group."
grief3r comes across more like a gamer handle than a music project...but again...thats just my opinion.
its not a "bad" logo...just seems pretty ordinary.
-
Trevor Jackson Trevor Jackson https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=111466
- KVRist
- 369 posts since 25 Jun, 2006
I think there should be some sort of mark to differentiate the E from the 3.
- KVRAF
- 1987 posts since 29 Apr, 2010 from NYC
simply cutting off the rest of the r from the vertical line would mirror the "e" from the other side and imply its backwards and therefore a "3" since thats how hes spelling it.Trevor Jackson wrote:I think there should be some sort of mark to differentiate the E from the 3.
like so:

Last edited by chaosWyrM on Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
- KVRAF
- 8563 posts since 2 Aug, 2005 from Guitar Land, USA
It looks pretty professional, I don't know any EDM groups, so not sure what the logos are normally like.
It seems good.
It seems good.
The only site for experimental amp sim freeware & MIDI FX: http://runbeerrun.blogspot.com
https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCprNcvVH6aPTehLv8J5xokA -Youtube jams
https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCprNcvVH6aPTehLv8J5xokA -Youtube jams
-
AstralExistence AstralExistence https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=265049
- KVRAF
- 2276 posts since 19 Sep, 2011
i don't like it at all. if anything, take a picture you like, and just cut out the shape with a vector editor. nobody will know where you jacked it but this logo looks an idea you thought of while sketching on a piece of lined paper in class 
- KVRAF
- 4287 posts since 6 Nov, 2009
Yes. Now cut little rectangles out of the letters to make them look a bit more digital.chaosWyrM wrote:simply cutting off the rest of the r from the vertical line would mirror the "e" from the other side and imply its backwards and therefore a "3" since thats how hes spelling it.Trevor Jackson wrote:I think there should be some sort of mark to differentiate the E from the 3.
like so:
- KVRAF
- 1987 posts since 29 Apr, 2010 from NYC
hows this? i left the red solid as its what draws the eye... i figured keeping it solid would make it stand out even more.arkmabat wrote:Yes. Now cut little rectangles out of the letters to make them look a bit more digital.chaosWyrM wrote:simply cutting off the rest of the r from the vertical line would mirror the "e" from the other side and imply its backwards and therefore a "3" since thats how hes spelling it.Trevor Jackson wrote:I think there should be some sort of mark to differentiate the E from the 3.
like so:

- KVRian
- 853 posts since 3 Nov, 2006 from Poland
I think the main problem is that almost every letter has different width and the spaces between the letters are different - in this kind of a logo you need IMHO a consistent dimensions. I would leave only the second "e" (or 3) red. And - for me - the letter R is not very balanced, it looks crooked.
