slow screen response etc
- KVRAF
- 13865 posts since 24 Jun, 2008 from Europe
I'm convinced it's something on your system. I have no control over the time the system needs for opening a file.
- KVRAF
- 24442 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
Long time to open a file is USUALLY suggesting antivirus software background scanning, indeed.
Disabling Windows indexing service might also help. Disable Windows Update, Windows Defender, all that stuff.
Disabling Windows indexing service might also help. Disable Windows Update, Windows Defender, all that stuff.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 180 posts since 19 May, 2009 from UK
I've not got any such stuff on my system - indexing already disabled
any other ideas welcome!!
(it certainly is the problem as Jo suggested - all I had to do was temporarily rename the audio folder and reload the project and problem "solved")
any other ideas welcome!!
(it certainly is the problem as Jo suggested - all I had to do was temporarily rename the audio folder and reload the project and problem "solved")
Cheers
Mick
Mick
- KVRAF
- 7412 posts since 8 Feb, 2003 from London, UK
Do you defrag regularly? You could have severe directory fragmentation that's causing problems.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 180 posts since 19 May, 2009 from UK
Just thinking the same
I hardly ever defrag (never solved any problems in the past) - but that could easily be the problem in this case
just tried the same project on an old laptop drive via a usb adapter and it's fine!
thanks for your input
I hardly ever defrag (never solved any problems in the past) - but that could easily be the problem in this case
just tried the same project on an old laptop drive via a usb adapter and it's fine!
thanks for your input
Cheers
Mick
Mick
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 180 posts since 19 May, 2009 from UK
Nope - for some reason my drives on 2 separate computers seem to be giving slow read speeds
an old laptop drive via a usb adapter works much better
I'm investigating the IDE drivers at the moment
an old laptop drive via a usb adapter works much better
I'm investigating the IDE drivers at the moment
Cheers
Mick
Mick
- KVRAF
- 7412 posts since 8 Feb, 2003 from London, UK
The built in defrag on Windows did not address directory fragmentation last time I read up on it, you need a higher-spec'd product. (I use PerfectDisk and recommend it; whilst I'd caution against getting much else from the company, their core product does the job.)mickwest1 wrote:ha ha - again defrag made no difference!
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 180 posts since 19 May, 2009 from UK
Well I've tried everything i can think of - re-installed ide drivers / re-installed windows etc etc
If I use an internal disk I get the slow start response
If I take the SAME disk and plug it into an external USB to SATA adapter it works nice and fast!
so it's not the drive - must be something to do with the IDE drivers or something else - ??
I realise this is not strictly an mulab topic now - (although I don't seem to have problems with any other software) -
but I'm appealing for any experts out there to give me a clue! - I've googled like mad (actually duckduckgo is my favoured search engine at the moment)
any help appreciated
If I use an internal disk I get the slow start response
If I take the SAME disk and plug it into an external USB to SATA adapter it works nice and fast!
so it's not the drive - must be something to do with the IDE drivers or something else - ??
I realise this is not strictly an mulab topic now - (although I don't seem to have problems with any other software) -
but I'm appealing for any experts out there to give me a clue! - I've googled like mad (actually duckduckgo is my favoured search engine at the moment)
any help appreciated
Cheers
Mick
Mick
- KVRAF
- 7412 posts since 8 Feb, 2003 from London, UK
Same disk via USB works better than native IDE..? That is weird.
At this point you will likely find more help over in Computer Setup and System Configuration - wider pool of readers to draw on.
At this point you will likely find more help over in Computer Setup and System Configuration - wider pool of readers to draw on.
- KVRAF
- 13865 posts since 24 Jun, 2008 from Europe
Yes and no. Mick is encountering this issue because there is a certain code point in MuLab where multiple files are opened. Normally this is no problem, i never received a problem report about that. But as we (Mick and i) researched, Mick's computer(s) turned out to be more than 10x slower wrt the 'open file' function, compared to an average test computer. That's very strange. And Mick is researching that. Curious for the outcome. Appart from this research, i'll also further optimize the MuLab code where possible and relevant to most users.bibz1st wrote:Does this mean its sorted or not then ?
-
- KVRian
- 855 posts since 3 Mar, 2009
I checked and there is no delay when start playing!AndreasD wrote:I'll check the play issue when I'm back home next week.
I clearly recall the transport cursor is slow even with modest sessions, but that's fixed.
There is an issue though. The audio files are recorded with a different sample rate as i usually use. All audio is resampled whenever i load one of these sessions. Even if i close Mulab and load the same session again, resampling takes place.
- KVRAF
- 13865 posts since 24 Jun, 2008 from Europe
That's logical because as long as you don't save the session the original MuSession file keeps pointing to the original audio files and so if you reload the session MuLab will notice the samplerate difference again. Or am i missing something?AndreasD wrote:There is an issue though. The audio files are recorded with a different sample rate as i usually use. All audio is resampled whenever i load one of these sessions. Even if i close Mulab and load the same session again, resampling takes place.
