Whilst I agree insofar as no one really buys a DAW primarily for it's accompanying plugins (and if they do I would question their reasoning), you can't help appreciate that certain DAW based plugins achieve infamy on their own. Logic users seem to cling to EXS24 for example; Tracktion is no different in this respect - look at the collective outrage over Finalmix being incompatible with T4, so much so that it was hacked into compatibility before being rewritten as Master Mix.pough wrote:I've never owned a Mac. But anyways, part of it is preference - it's very nice to have the plugins that you want and not ones that someone else has chosen for you. Another issues is the ability to swap a project from one DAW to another. The plugins that come with DAWs are generally locked to that DAW.dupont wrote:Logic native one's sound rather good in my opinion (and other too).pough wrote:The number of times I've used the bundled plugins that come with other DAWs comes pretty close to zero
This is of course just my opinion. Some think that a DAW should come with plugins. I personally disagree with that and have listed my reasons.
I don't think any DAW ships with zero plugins; there are certain bases that just need to be covered. Manufacturers have no interest in making their plugins available in other DAW's, hence why they tend to be specific - and ultimately the standards (vst, au, etc) bridge the gap (although the Reaper guys released the Reaplugs separately didn't they, so props to them).
I'm sure the proportion of consumers who want plugins bundled is far higher than those who favour choice, and ultimately, you still have the choice. The argument then just becomes a monetary one - do you want manufacturers concentrating on providing plugins when they could be providing updates to the DAW? Tracktion are trying to negate this with the Marketplace, I gather...and props to them for making their home developed plugins VST and cross DAW compatible.
I'm not sure I had a point? Carry on without me....
