Create new track
-
- KVRist
- 331 posts since 1 Nov, 2005 from UK
You people are steadily making this software too complicated.
Stop it.
Stop it.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Croak-Dilemmas/ ... MMAS+CROAK
I7 3770K, Asus P8Z77 V PRO, WIN 7 HP.
T1/2/3/4/5/6.
I7 3770K, Asus P8Z77 V PRO, WIN 7 HP.
T1/2/3/4/5/6.
-
- KVRAF
- 2464 posts since 9 Oct, 2008 from UK
We're trying to understand it and uncomplicate it.shindigger wrote:You people are steadily making this software too complicated.
Stop it.
[W10-64, T5/6/7/W8/9/10/11/12/13, 32(to W8)&64 all, Spike],[W7-32, T5/6/7/W8, Gina16] everything underused.
- KVRAF
- 4898 posts since 3 Jan, 2003 from Vancouver
Maybe we can make a new sticky for FRR (feature removal request).shindigger wrote:You people are steadily making this software too complicated.
Stop it.
Surely there must be consensus by now...
-
- KVRist
- 331 posts since 1 Nov, 2005 from UK
I'm sure id like the video ghosting feature fixed. You know the one that only applies to this programme. That drags the GUI for ANY plug in i use all over both screens.
Or the melodyne being out of time despite being at maximum buffer on an i7 with 16gb ram.
Or T4 now just poofing when i close it since loading 5 and 6.
Or all my waves plugs not working or having their names recognised properly.
Yeah, remove all those features.
Stability over pin prick featurettes please.
Or the melodyne being out of time despite being at maximum buffer on an i7 with 16gb ram.
Or T4 now just poofing when i close it since loading 5 and 6.
Or all my waves plugs not working or having their names recognised properly.
Yeah, remove all those features.
Stability over pin prick featurettes please.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Croak-Dilemmas/ ... MMAS+CROAK
I7 3770K, Asus P8Z77 V PRO, WIN 7 HP.
T1/2/3/4/5/6.
I7 3770K, Asus P8Z77 V PRO, WIN 7 HP.
T1/2/3/4/5/6.
-
- KVRAF
- 2464 posts since 9 Oct, 2008 from UK
New track creation?shindigger wrote:Stability over pin prick featurettes please.
[W10-64, T5/6/7/W8/9/10/11/12/13, 32(to W8)&64 all, Spike],[W7-32, T5/6/7/W8, Gina16] everything underused.
-
- KVRist
- 331 posts since 1 Nov, 2005 from UK
Youre asking for a button that gives an option to put the new track at the top or the bottom right?
When its always been at the bottom.
If its important to people, then fair enough.
Ts claim to fame is its simplicity, too much loading of extra buttons and features that perhaps nobody gives 2 figs about, or didn't know that they gave 2 figs about, could MAYBE begin to dilute the message, is all im saying.
I'm just a tad cheesed off with the amount of hoiking around i've done with my hardware to make this version of T useable for me right now.
I still dont feel i can trust T with a days recording at the moment.
Its all over the place for me.
T3 was the most stable, useable, iteration of this software for me.
When its always been at the bottom.
If its important to people, then fair enough.
Ts claim to fame is its simplicity, too much loading of extra buttons and features that perhaps nobody gives 2 figs about, or didn't know that they gave 2 figs about, could MAYBE begin to dilute the message, is all im saying.
I'm just a tad cheesed off with the amount of hoiking around i've done with my hardware to make this version of T useable for me right now.
I still dont feel i can trust T with a days recording at the moment.
Its all over the place for me.
T3 was the most stable, useable, iteration of this software for me.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Croak-Dilemmas/ ... MMAS+CROAK
I7 3770K, Asus P8Z77 V PRO, WIN 7 HP.
T1/2/3/4/5/6.
I7 3770K, Asus P8Z77 V PRO, WIN 7 HP.
T1/2/3/4/5/6.
-
- KVRAF
- 2464 posts since 9 Oct, 2008 from UK
Erm, no. At the moment, it isn't always created at the bottom. That's the point. In some case it's created at the bottom, but if a track is highlighted or if you right-click a track and create from that sub-menu, then it's not created at the bottom.
So all we were aiming for was to understand where it gets created, and someone suggested it should be below rather than above a track in the circumstances when it isn't added at the bottom.
And then it occurred to me that if you're using tagging to restrict the number of tracks you're dealing with, but then create a new track to go with the ones you're looking at, it won't appear among them, so then you have to go off and find it and tag it so it will.
So all we were aiming for was to understand where it gets created, and someone suggested it should be below rather than above a track in the circumstances when it isn't added at the bottom.
And then it occurred to me that if you're using tagging to restrict the number of tracks you're dealing with, but then create a new track to go with the ones you're looking at, it won't appear among them, so then you have to go off and find it and tag it so it will.
[W10-64, T5/6/7/W8/9/10/11/12/13, 32(to W8)&64 all, Spike],[W7-32, T5/6/7/W8, Gina16] everything underused.
-
- KVRist
- 331 posts since 1 Nov, 2005 from UK
Lets just have the new effing track at the bottom would be my take home message here.
Programme the doubt out of it.
See? Easy.
Programme the doubt out of it.
See? Easy.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Croak-Dilemmas/ ... MMAS+CROAK
I7 3770K, Asus P8Z77 V PRO, WIN 7 HP.
T1/2/3/4/5/6.
I7 3770K, Asus P8Z77 V PRO, WIN 7 HP.
T1/2/3/4/5/6.
-
- KVRist
- 39 posts since 22 Feb, 2015
I may be missing something, but it seems that's exactly what happened.shindigger wrote:Lets just have the new effing track at the bottom would be my take home message here.
Programme the doubt out of it.
See? Easy.
I am sure there are some complicated issues in Tracktion, and I can understand your frustration, but I don't believe that should take away from them doing simple 'pin-prick' things to make a better DAW while they work on the more important stability stuff.
-
- KVRist
- 140 posts since 18 Jul, 2013 from Maryland, USA
I place my new tracks where I want them by highlighting the track below where I want them to appear. As soon as I learned how it works I just started using it that way and got on with it.
For example you have tracks 4, 5 and six and you want the new track(s) to appear between 4 and 5, so you highlight 5 and create the new track. Things are less complicated for me because I only use T and it is easier to just learn how it works and use it as it is.
It will always be a struggle for TSC to keep new features and functions from bloating the DAW. On the other hand I love the fact that they do respond to a lot of user requests for features even while they are up to their ears fixing bugs and making T compatible with 10,000 different plugins from 20,000 different vendors.
Roll on Tracktioneers. Roll on TSC.
Regards,
theoldguy
For example you have tracks 4, 5 and six and you want the new track(s) to appear between 4 and 5, so you highlight 5 and create the new track. Things are less complicated for me because I only use T and it is easier to just learn how it works and use it as it is.
It will always be a struggle for TSC to keep new features and functions from bloating the DAW. On the other hand I love the fact that they do respond to a lot of user requests for features even while they are up to their ears fixing bugs and making T compatible with 10,000 different plugins from 20,000 different vendors.
Roll on Tracktioneers. Roll on TSC.
Regards,
theoldguy
It is time to come together in the middle of the road.
-
Peter Widdicombe Peter Widdicombe https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=336849
- KVRian
- 1221 posts since 29 Aug, 2014
Hmmm... with the "create below selected track" it will now be really clumsy to create a new "top" track. With the "create before" default, you could create a new track anywhere.
Maybe this should be a user preference setting? (Above or below on insert track...).
Maybe this should be a user preference setting? (Above or below on insert track...).
Waveform 13; Win10 desktop/8 Gig; Win11 Laptop; MPK261; VFX+disfunctional ESQ-1
