TAL Sampler
- KVRAF
- 43899 posts since 11 Aug, 2008 from clown world
A day has passed and I've tried the Sampler again.
Meh ... Still feeling like it's just bland and sterile sounding.
On the other hand, I loaded up the latest version of Dexed (v0.9.0) right after and felt totally inspired. Even if it's not 100% there yet, I'd put money down for Dexed long before TAL Sampler.
I guess 'I'm Out' as they say.
Meh ... Still feeling like it's just bland and sterile sounding.
On the other hand, I loaded up the latest version of Dexed (v0.9.0) right after and felt totally inspired. Even if it's not 100% there yet, I'd put money down for Dexed long before TAL Sampler.
I guess 'I'm Out' as they say.
Anyone who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
-
fluffy_little_something fluffy_little_something https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=281847
- Banned
- 12880 posts since 5 Jun, 2012
I assume it is the same irritating demo noise I noticed with the U-NO-LX recentlyAloysius wrote:That rising noise in the demo version is a wee bit annoying.
I managed to get a half decent looking skin after a few seconds.
Some of the presets sound good but kind of sterile. I wonder if I'm the type of person that would be happier with a bunch of vintage sampler instruments for Kontakt instead. I'm sure I'd have great intentions to make my own instruments with this TAL offering but probably never get around to it.
We can already get vintage type sampler distortion with one of the D16 Plugins. The name of the plugin (like all D16 plugins) escapes me at the moment.
I didn't think I'd purchase TALs first two VSTi instruments but I did eventually.
I don't know about this one. Just thinking out loud. Waiting to read other peoples comments.
Anyway, judging from the GUI it should allow for quite flexible sounds thanks to those 4 layers. Not unlike Korg's M1, but with a better user interface.
If it sounds sterile, maybe it has to do with the samples used. Did you try your own samples?
- KVRAF
- 25849 posts since 20 Jan, 2008 from a star near where you are
I guess too.Aloysius wrote:I guess 'I'm Out' as they say.
Dexed is an emulation of a digital synth, while TAL-Sampler is not
- KVRAF
- 43899 posts since 11 Aug, 2008 from clown world
No. I won't bother. I'm just not 'feeling it man', if you know what I mean. Maybe I can get a better sound if I do X, Y and Z. But maybe I'll never get to that stage. Two different instruments of course. But one 'does it for me' and the other doesn't.fluffy_little_something wrote:I assume it is the same irritating demo noise I noticed with the U-NO-LX recentlyAloysius wrote:That rising noise in the demo version is a wee bit annoying.
I managed to get a half decent looking skin after a few seconds.
Some of the presets sound good but kind of sterile. I wonder if I'm the type of person that would be happier with a bunch of vintage sampler instruments for Kontakt instead. I'm sure I'd have great intentions to make my own instruments with this TAL offering but probably never get around to it.
We can already get vintage type sampler distortion with one of the D16 Plugins. The name of the plugin (like all D16 plugins) escapes me at the moment.
I didn't think I'd purchase TALs first two VSTi instruments but I did eventually.
I don't know about this one. Just thinking out loud. Waiting to read other peoples comments.![]()
Anyway, judging from the GUI it should allow for quite flexible sounds thanks to those 4 layers. Not unlike Korg's M1, but with a better user interface.
If it sounds sterile, maybe it has to do with the samples used. Did you try your own samples?
Anyone who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
-
- KVRAF
- 7018 posts since 28 Apr, 2004 from france
Interesting. It looks a little bit like an hybrid between Morgana(for the gritty character) and Grace(for the easy but deep features).
Grace seems to have more fun in the modulation department (thanks to its stepseq and XYpad and also the mapping seems better), but TAL Sampler got me interested with the timestretching...
I'll give the demo a try !
Grace seems to have more fun in the modulation department (thanks to its stepseq and XYpad and also the mapping seems better), but TAL Sampler got me interested with the timestretching...
I'll give the demo a try !
- KVRAF
- 25849 posts since 20 Jan, 2008 from a star near where you are
I'm not sure about that, how many sample layers can Grace handle, only 1 ?sinkmusic wrote:Grace seems to have more fun in the modulation department
TAL-Sampler got 4.
-
- Banned
- 2238 posts since 19 Dec, 2014
sinkmusic wrote:Interesting. It looks a little bit like an hybrid between Morgana(for the gritty character) and Grace(for the easy but deep features).
Grace seems to have more fun in the modulation department (thanks to its stepseq and XYpad and also the mapping seems better), but TAL Sampler got me interested with the timestretching...
I'll give the demo a try !
Morgana is interesting...but not 170euro interesting.
-
- KVRAF
- 7018 posts since 28 Apr, 2004 from france
Grace can handle at least 8 layers (i didn't try more).Numanoid wrote:I'm not sure about that, how many sample layers can Grace handle, only 1 ?sinkmusic wrote:Grace seems to have more fun in the modulation department
TAL-Sampler got 4.
From this thread, it can handle 127 layers, but i would invite you to go there to check it out (i just posted 2 screenshots), so we won't be hijacking the TAL thread
-
- KVRAF
- 1618 posts since 15 Aug, 2001 from montreal, canada
I like it but so far my only issue has been the zipper noise when changing delay time and offset.
Stuck in Aperture Laboratories for a 2nd time!
-
- KVRist
- 335 posts since 20 Jul, 2010
-
- KVRAF
- 2973 posts since 10 Sep, 2003 from Karlskoga, Stockholm, Sweden
Ouch that demo noise .......
but
Patrick/Thorsten ... thank you for making this! I've been longing for something like this for a long time. There's threads on several places discussing vintage samplers and how we want them in software form. Your Juno/101 emulations are fantastic so based on these things ill buy it after just a few minutes testing. Stupid, i know but i can't stand that tinnitus inducing noise.
In on of the threads we talked about how much transposing changes the sound on different samplers. Is this something considered in this plugin?
Lastly, congrats on releasing the new reverb. Seems to sound very nice according to the BPB video. I'll play with the sampler first though!

but
Patrick/Thorsten ... thank you for making this! I've been longing for something like this for a long time. There's threads on several places discussing vintage samplers and how we want them in software form. Your Juno/101 emulations are fantastic so based on these things ill buy it after just a few minutes testing. Stupid, i know but i can't stand that tinnitus inducing noise.
In on of the threads we talked about how much transposing changes the sound on different samplers. Is this something considered in this plugin?
Lastly, congrats on releasing the new reverb. Seems to sound very nice according to the BPB video. I'll play with the sampler first though!
-
- KVRist
- 335 posts since 20 Jul, 2010
Also the 'load' button in the sample area doesn't do anything (x64 demo version, Cubase 5 x64).
-
- KVRian
- 595 posts since 8 May, 2006
i've been testing this new TAL Sampler all day against Morgana. hard to explain, but i still prefer Morgana even after tweaking the hell out of every possible combination of these DAC emus. it's VERY close, but there's just something inside Morgana (some sort of EQ/filtering) that it does to the samples which i haven't found with anything else. it accentuates/distorts certain frequencies in a really pleasing way.Daags wrote:Morgana is interesting...but not 170euro interesting.
- KVRAF
- 2818 posts since 30 Aug, 2001 from where dinosaurs are still alive
Agreeing that Morgana has still value.
If I have to leave a Sampler behind that would be Cyclone, just for that gui/os perfect implementation which makes it perfectly slow.
Morgana's grit and filter are a good combo as in Tal's Sampler.
Tal's manages to offer more (layers, stretch, selfosc, modulations, sfz, etc) and the utilitarian gui helps me a lot.
Haven't found mention of Stretch limitations in the manual.
If I have to leave a Sampler behind that would be Cyclone, just for that gui/os perfect implementation which makes it perfectly slow.
Morgana's grit and filter are a good combo as in Tal's Sampler.
Tal's manages to offer more (layers, stretch, selfosc, modulations, sfz, etc) and the utilitarian gui helps me a lot.
Haven't found mention of Stretch limitations in the manual.
- KVRAF
- 25849 posts since 20 Jan, 2008 from a star near where you are
Was the old freeware version also available as 64 bit plug?pc2000 wrote:The vsti freeze and playback is the only reason I can see using this product. Mapping samples isn't that straightforward with such a small editing window. Can't see what the appeal of the current version could be!?
