Your biggest wish for M7

[Taifunk]

5. FM filter module - just like Ringmod with two inputs for Carrier and Modulator

Yes, this would be really great. Or math modules, or arpeggiator.

I guess, to sum up, any new mux toys would get my vote. All the recent improvements to the front panel have made mux even more inspiring.

+1
Fm filter module That would be great , agree on the rest
I do not know if it already exists But I would add a request, an option to synchronize the start stop of Ifo, mp envelopes ... when you create an effect

What's your biggest wish for M7?

I am undecided on what to vote
it may be useful I want to share my opinion with other users
for example the time stretching is not for me an indispensable feature
but it is a feature that could attract new customers .
but also the new modules and features in mux attract new custumer and makes happy old customers.
probably not useful to make a clone of another daw , is better to focus on the unique characteristics that owns mulab and improve them and add new ones e.g already has an excellent workflow,edit any parameter in a perfect way, the full modularity,It sounds great etc..and everything improves and adds something to this is perfect for me.
IMO this is better than, what they already do the other daw


@EvilDragon
I Have Reaper But mulab has what that reaper not 'has,I also tried fl studio and it does not have what reaper and mu lab have ...and viceversa
but It would be nice MU-REA-FLab

PS:sorry for my bad English

[EvilDragon]

@EvilDragon
I Have Reaper But mulab has what that reaper not 'has,I also tried fl studio and it does not have what reaper and mu lab have ...and viceversa
but It would be nice MU-REA-FLab

What exactly do you mean? Each DAW has something the other doesn't. If you mean Mulab's modular back-end, FL has that with Patcher, and Reaper has it too via pin matrices - it's not as visual, but certainly it's quite modular alright.

[Reincke]

My very, very biggest wish for M7 is an extended "event graph editor" inside (!) the sequence editor, so we can choose for each parameter / controller either

• bar mode
• curve mode
• automation curve like in envelope editor

That would give us at least this benefits:

• a coupling of note editor and automation curve editor
• the choice of editing parameter events either by bars or by (event) curve

Some details would have to be concerned, e.g. what happens when switching from event to envelope mode.

What do you think?
JR

[MuTools]

I think the most important thing regarding speed is this: FL Sstudio inserts note with a single click, no modifiers necessary. Removes notes on right click. This is tremendously fast. Mulab demands double-click or ctrl-click+drag, which is slower (and after some time, tiring).

Note that MuLab 6.0 introduced a separate pencil tool in the piano roll. It's especially added to avoid having to double-click or control click. It's just single click drawing. Did you already try that pencil tool?

[MuTools]

Oh! on a slighty different tack, can't explain why, but the Master strip rack being on the left side just seems wrong.

You can drag it to the right, or wherever you want.

[EvilDragon]

Ah, I didn't check it out. Cool! Still, there's lots to learn from FL's piano roll in the way things operate, so it might be cool to investigate why lots of people love it so much.

(For example, your pencil tool demands double-click to remove note, or aim for the center of the note, whereas it's just faster to right-click in FL anywhere on the note. I find it slightly confusing and error-prone that single click on center of the note deletes it, but doesn't do that on the note edges. This is why right-click is simply safer, and you can make left-click consistent on note edge and note center.


Of course, I'm not saying to flat-out copy it completely. Just take note of what's so awesome about it, check out some Youtube vids, etc.

[MuTools]

Ah, I didn't check it out. Cool! Still, there's lots to learn from FL's piano roll in the way things operate, so it might be cool to investigate why lots of people love it so much.

That's definitely true: Lots of people love it. Yes i'm open to continue learning from it and others.

For example, your pencil tool demands double-click to remove note, or aim for the center of the note, whereas it's just faster to right-click in FL anywhere on the note. I find it slightly confusing and error-prone that single click on center of the note deletes it, but doesn't do that on the note edges. This is why right-click is simply safer, and you can make left-click consistent on note edge and note center.

I understand your point. At the same time i don't want to break the right-click = context menu principle. So i would rather abandon the left/right edges so a click with the pencil on an existing note always deletes it. But then: As it is now it's not about the center of the note, it's about everywhere on the note the pencil deletes, except for the edges then you can move the start/end. Of course for short notes these zones can be close to each other and i guess that's often the case hence your constructive criticism on the 'zoned' behavior. Right?

[Taifunk]

@EvilDragon
I Have Reaper But mulab has what that reaper not 'has,I also tried fl studio and it does not have what reaper and mu lab have ...and viceversa
but It would be nice MU-REA-FLab

What exactly do you mean? Each DAW has something the other doesn't. If you mean Mulab's modular back-end, FL has that with Patcher, and Reaper has it too via pin matrices - it's not as visual, but certainly it's quite modular alright.

you're right, I have not explained well
I was referring to this

All other DAWs are missing something or another in comparison. The closest I managed to duplicate FL's behaviour was in Reaper, thanks to its mouse modifiers feature. Still, dealing with CCs is different in Reaper (some things are better, some are not).

I mean I like all three

[EvilDragon]

Of course for short notes these zones can be close to each other and i guess that's often the case hence your constructive criticism on the 'zoned' behavior. Right?

Bingo!

[EvilDragon]

Oh, one great thing I'd love to happen in MuLab 7 - submenus in menus/contexts not needing a click to open. If that already happened, it went waaaay over my head.

[heks]

Oh! on a slighty different tack, can't explain why, but the Master strip rack being on the left side just seems wrong.

You can drag it to the right, or wherever you want.

I've try'd that but it' becomes the rack at the right side of racks starting at the left side. Its not a problem to hinder making music, its just a preference, but feels wrong, sort of like stroking a cat from tail to head,,, wrong.

[MuTools]

I've try'd that but it' becomes the rack at the right side of racks starting at the left side.

Huh, i don't understand that sentence. Note that you can arrange the order of the racks as you want. Click-drag a rack's titlebar to the left or right and drop it in between racks to put it in between these racks, or drop it at the full right to make it the right-most rack. Simple.

[bibz1st]

I think he means that, say, you start from New Project, you have the Master rack and Basic Synth rack. Now if you move the Master to the right of Basic Synth it is still on the left hand side of the screen.

[MuTools]

To elaborate: There is nothing in the code that puts the 'master' rack at the left. New racks are simply added at the right of the last rack, but as mentioned above you can rearrange them as you like. About the 'master' rack: In fact there is nothing special about the master rack, it's just a rack that is called Master, if you like, and where all other racks are routed to. But you don't have to use a master rack, or you can use two of them, it's free.

[MuTools]

I think he means that, say, you start from New Project, you have the Master rack and Basic Synth rack. Now if you move the Master to the right of Basic Synth it is still on the left hand side of the screen.

Oh really, is it that what you mean heks? Well, yes that's the case then. Would look weird to have racks at the left then a gap then racks at the right, no?