True analog modeling?
-
- KVRAF
- 4751 posts since 22 Nov, 2012
Urs man, I know I've asked for this several times and you've explained why not, but this will be the last time I say it. Oscillators as modulation source would BLOW THE BARN DOORS off Hive. It would elevate it to a whole other class and IMO I would prefer it over a virus... just saying. That will be the last time. I really don't care if it shoots the cpu up30% or what ever.
Peaces guys, I'm going to eat sleeping pills till I'm out tonight. I can't stay up another night.
Peaces guys, I'm going to eat sleeping pills till I'm out tonight. I can't stay up another night.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 34 posts since 10 Jul, 2015
I'm just going to dwell on this for a second and throw out a few scenarios for oscillators as mod source. I don't know if they are doable or anything. Just throwing out ideas here. It's fun to talk about.
One idea would be to take the lfo's into audio rate like ace's. Done, and that's that.
Another would be to insert a switch or button for each oscillator with destinations. Oscillator one would have destinations of oscillator 2, sub oscillator 2, and filter 2. Oscillator two would then have destinations of oscillator 1, sub oscillator 1, and filter 1.
A third would be to insert a button that makes the LFO's a destination for the oscillators. (I'm not entirely sure this would work, but it would be cool to experiment with).
The fourth would be make the oscillator a source in the mod matrix of course. One that could only be assignable to specific destinations.
Just throwing thoughts here... There is just so much potential here it's hard not to think about it.
One idea would be to take the lfo's into audio rate like ace's. Done, and that's that.
Another would be to insert a switch or button for each oscillator with destinations. Oscillator one would have destinations of oscillator 2, sub oscillator 2, and filter 2. Oscillator two would then have destinations of oscillator 1, sub oscillator 1, and filter 1.
A third would be to insert a button that makes the LFO's a destination for the oscillators. (I'm not entirely sure this would work, but it would be cool to experiment with).
The fourth would be make the oscillator a source in the mod matrix of course. One that could only be assignable to specific destinations.
Just throwing thoughts here... There is just so much potential here it's hard not to think about it.
-
- KVRAF
- 3485 posts since 25 Apr, 2011
The fourth option would be amazing. Literally the only thing i mis a.t.m. in Hive. So +1Nanners wrote:I'm just going to dwell on this for a second and throw out a few scenarios for oscillators as mod source. I don't know if they are doable or anything. Just throwing out ideas here. It's fun to talk about.
One idea would be to take the lfo's into audio rate like ace's. Done, and that's that.
Another would be to insert a switch or button for each oscillator with destinations. Oscillator one would have destinations of oscillator 2, sub oscillator 2, and filter 2. Oscillator two would then have destinations of oscillator 1, sub oscillator 1, and filter 1.
A third would be to insert a button that makes the LFO's a destination for the oscillators. (I'm not entirely sure this would work, but it would be cool to experiment with).
The fourth would be make the oscillator a source in the mod matrix of course. One that could only be assignable to specific destinations.
Just throwing thoughts here... There is just so much potential here it's hard not to think about it.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 34 posts since 10 Jul, 2015
hahaha... I would most definitely be in the looney house. I'm picturing Urs in a dark room sweating bullets and hopped up on 12 cups of coffee coding his ass off saying "I'm damned if I do, and I'm damned if I don't."
If he does it all the guys using 60! instances of Hive in their tracks will have a meltdown (for real there was a guy in the main forum using 60 instances of Largo, blew my mind). If you're taking a break and reading through some of this Urs all I can offer to you is a little simplification on the matter. I'm sure you learned this already as a business man but a reminder sometimes puts things in perspective.
There are 7 billion people on this rock, and half of them are offended when you wake up in the morning, and the other half are waiting for you to give them a reason to be offended. At the end of the day you really just need to be able to stand back and go... "I did the best I could possibly do and I don't think anyone could do it better, and damn I'm proud of that."
I'll be using it either way now.
If he does it all the guys using 60! instances of Hive in their tracks will have a meltdown (for real there was a guy in the main forum using 60 instances of Largo, blew my mind). If you're taking a break and reading through some of this Urs all I can offer to you is a little simplification on the matter. I'm sure you learned this already as a business man but a reminder sometimes puts things in perspective.
There are 7 billion people on this rock, and half of them are offended when you wake up in the morning, and the other half are waiting for you to give them a reason to be offended. At the end of the day you really just need to be able to stand back and go... "I did the best I could possibly do and I don't think anyone could do it better, and damn I'm proud of that."
I'll be using it either way now.
-
- u-he
- 30245 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Hehehe… the reason ACE and Bazille take up CPU above your average synth is the audio rate modulation. As much as I would entertain the idea, Hive is conceptually not meant to be this.
We will sneak some audio rate stuff in one day, but it needs to fit the concept, i.e. no hidden tolls on CPU and no way to accidentally make things sound awkward.
We will sneak some audio rate stuff in one day, but it needs to fit the concept, i.e. no hidden tolls on CPU and no way to accidentally make things sound awkward.
-
- KVRAF
- 4751 posts since 22 Nov, 2012
All good it's I'm not trying to cause you trouble I just want it SOOOOO BAAAAAAAAD. But on the flip side it seems like you are planning to support these products for a very long time. I shouldn't be surprised with the way you supported zebra. Maybe when the processors are able to support hive 2.0 