Diva vs Analogue - a real world test
- KVRAF
- 3361 posts since 31 Dec, 2004 from People's Republic of Minnesota
Post some more examples, but mix a and b up. I wonder if some of the diehard analogue hardware enthusiasts will make an appearance in this thread after that. 
-
- KVRian
- 1374 posts since 30 Mar, 2011
Trust me, they'll find their excuses.IncarnateX wrote:Sure with only two choices a hit could be pure chance. However, a miss by an analog preacher man could still be embarrasing2ZrgE wrote: In a way completely useless because with a simple A/B test you could be right just be guessing.
-
- Banned
- 3889 posts since 3 Feb, 2010
A is Oberheim
B is Diva
A sounds a bit more sturdy and robust, wich is a characteristics that hardware (mostly analog) exhibits. B feels a bit washed out comparing to A (this is characteristic that most plugin synth exhibits).
B is Diva
A sounds a bit more sturdy and robust, wich is a characteristics that hardware (mostly analog) exhibits. B feels a bit washed out comparing to A (this is characteristic that most plugin synth exhibits).
-
- KVRist
- 406 posts since 27 Feb, 2014 from France
i have diva but i m not familiar enought to know if the envelop can be clicky like in synth B ?
Analog electronic drum samples (Free demo pack)
http://www.syntheticwav.com
http://www.syntheticwav.com
-
thecontrolcentre thecontrolcentre https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=76240
- KVRAF
- 37261 posts since 27 Jul, 2005 from Scottish Borders
- KVRAF
- 18338 posts since 26 Jun, 2006 from San Francisco Bay Area
</thread>chk071 wrote:The Beatles. 'nuff said.![]()
But I'm going to say the real synth is A, Diva is B.
One thing that confused me a bit is that I thought in some of the examples the envelopes in B made me think B was the hardware. Envelopes are usually a "tell" for me in these tests, but I thought the "body" of B was mushy and less distinct. But what the hell, I'll go with my initial answer.
BUT. I will also say that typical bread and butter sounds like this are in the overlap of what software and hardware both do well. Tests like this are a bit self selecting. It would be pretty easy to find the places where software failed and do the same test and we'd all know the answer. It's why I maintain that a hybrid approach is the way to go. Softsynths for what they do fine and for when you need a little extra oomph, whip out the analog.
Zerocrossing Media
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
- KVRAF
- 12522 posts since 21 Mar, 2008 from Hannover, Germany
It's not easy indeed while i own Diva myself and have done some "Oberheimish" sounds with it too (and others like e.g. Jupiter 8 etc.). Also got a real analog Pulse 2 here (my ownly remaining real nalog) and a few Oberheim emulations (e.g. the free OBXD and Arturia Oberheim SEM V).
Anyway my guess is that Synth A is a real OB8 and B is Diva whie i am not totally sure.
At the end Diva seems to be a fantastic emulation of analog synths and it's more or less modular approach with mixing modules of different synth is awesome IMO and makes it impossible to replace it by another softsynth.
I hope i could finally get a new PC soon to replace the current one so i could use DIVA at full quality without being limited to a few tracks.
PS:
DIVA doe not seem to include any modules that directly emulate an OB8 and the "Uhbie" filter seems to be closer to a SEM design. This means taht if you are able to match teh sounds of a OB8 it could be a cmbination of both luck and good sound design skills.
Anyway my guess is that Synth A is a real OB8 and B is Diva whie i am not totally sure.
At the end Diva seems to be a fantastic emulation of analog synths and it's more or less modular approach with mixing modules of different synth is awesome IMO and makes it impossible to replace it by another softsynth.
I hope i could finally get a new PC soon to replace the current one so i could use DIVA at full quality without being limited to a few tracks.
PS:
DIVA doe not seem to include any modules that directly emulate an OB8 and the "Uhbie" filter seems to be closer to a SEM design. This means taht if you are able to match teh sounds of a OB8 it could be a cmbination of both luck and good sound design skills.
Last edited by Ingonator on Fri Aug 21, 2015 4:02 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Ingo Weidner
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1
- KVRAF
- 22870 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
Well then let me ask. What are the kinds of sounds that soft synths don't do well? Can you post some examples? And then, after that's done, maybe the OP can program those two sounds (assuming he has the hardware synth that made it) and then we can really tell.zerocrossing wrote:</thread>chk071 wrote:The Beatles. 'nuff said.![]()
![]()
But I'm going to say the real synth is A, Diva is B.
One thing that confused me a bit is that I thought in some of the examples the envelopes in B made me think B was the hardware. Envelopes are usually a "tell" for me in these tests, but I thought the "body" of B was mushy and less distinct. But what the hell, I'll go with my initial answer.
BUT. I will also say that typical bread and butter sounds like this are in the overlap of what software and hardware both do well. Tests like this are a bit self selecting. It would be pretty easy to find the places where software failed and do the same test and we'd all know the answer. It's why I maintain that a hybrid approach is the way to go. Softsynths for what they do fine and for when you need a little extra oomph, whip out the analog.
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 1735 posts since 28 Dec, 2007
With Diva - what are these places it fails? Ive tested I think most extremes I can with an OB8 and Source....there are Unison examples here (which often fail in other softsynths) and full/very high resonance...zerocrossing wrote:It would be pretty easy to find the places where software failed and do the same test and we'd all know the answer.
Presets for u-he Diva -> http://swanaudio.co.uk/
-
fluffy_little_something fluffy_little_something https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=281847
- Banned
- 12880 posts since 5 Jun, 2012
So, when will we know the answer?
Seems that so far most people think A is the hardware...
Seems that so far most people think A is the hardware...
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 1735 posts since 28 Dec, 2007
if its ok Id like to keep it open at least for a few days to let people see it...but not past the point it becomes boring and everyone forgets...
Presets for u-he Diva -> http://swanaudio.co.uk/
-
- KVRist
- 406 posts since 27 Feb, 2014 from France
my problems with these tests is that you try to make both sound the same..a test where you try to show where they behave differelenty would more intresting and usefull to get better emulation, these test are fun but don't mean much . a freeware compressor could sound really close to a 3000 $$ one too if you really wanna match the sound insteed of demonstrating the difference.
Analog electronic drum samples (Free demo pack)
http://www.syntheticwav.com
http://www.syntheticwav.com
-
Funkybot's Evil Twin Funkybot's Evil Twin https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=116627
- KVRAF
- 12438 posts since 16 Aug, 2006
I was hearing a little bit more top end and reverb in A versus B. If I had to guess: A is DIVA, B is hardware. Not sure I care though. So biggest difference: A felt consistently brighter in the first video than B, which I preferred. They're certainly close enough.
