I'm trying to recreate some of my MVintageRotary presets in MRotary and have some questions...
- What are the equivalent parameters in MRotary for MVintageRotary's "Width" (at the top) and EQ "Color" parameters?
- What are the bass, mids and treble EQ frequencies set to in MVIntageRotary (freq/Q)?
- Are the Model1, Model2 and Model3 cabinets in MVintareRotary approximately equivalent to the Wood material cabinets in MRotary?
Equivalents of some MVintageRotary parameters in MRotary
-
- KVRian
- 1094 posts since 13 Mar, 2008 from Arnhem, Netherlands
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122 - KVRAF
- 14339 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
It quite won't work really, the processing is different. The vintage rotary active presets are sort of similar, but only similar. I'm sorry I won't tell you the specs of equalizer in MVintageRotary (for instance because I don't remember 
). Also the Models are just different. Sorry to say, you just cannot really create the same sound with MRotary probably.
). Also the Models are just different. Sorry to say, you just cannot really create the same sound with MRotary probably.-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1094 posts since 13 Mar, 2008 from Arnhem, Netherlands
Thanks for the reply.
It's enough to know that, really. I'll just get them close by ear
It's enough to know that, really. I'll just get them close by ear
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- 14339 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
On the other hand, you can try to set them up differently and it might be even better 
.
.-
- KVRAF
- 10368 posts since 2 Sep, 2003 from Surrey, UK
I'm curious why you are aiming to get them the same? Why not just use the most appropriate plug-in? Or is there something unique in MRotary?
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1094 posts since 13 Mar, 2008 from Arnhem, Netherlands
I'm using MVintageRotary in my live rig, but want to "upgrade" to MRotary because it has more creative options.
I don't want to run both as I can use every cpu cycle in my setup.
Ideally, I'd like to replace the MVintageRotary sounds 1:1 at first and then expand on that later or in songs added from that point forward.
I don't want to run both as I can use every cpu cycle in my setup.
Ideally, I'd like to replace the MVintageRotary sounds 1:1 at first and then expand on that later or in songs added from that point forward.
-
- KVRAF
- 10368 posts since 2 Sep, 2003 from Surrey, UK
Got it . So , yes, get close as you can and go from there. Good luck.
. So , yes, get close as you can and go from there. Good luck.-
- KVRAF
- 2696 posts since 9 Jul, 2015 from UK
About the width control:
From the manual for MVintageRotary:
Width defines the distance of the microphones from each other. The further they are from each other, the wider the output usually seems as each microphone is exposed to a different amount of time (doppler shift), volume and spectral alterations. Additionally when this value is above 100% and the microphones cannot be any further away from each other, a digital widening is applied.
Now in MRotary, there is a microphone diagram to the right. I gues when they are completely together or apart, this will simulate 0% to 100% respectively. Then anything above 100% would be made up with the "widening" control.
From the manual for MVintageRotary:
Width defines the distance of the microphones from each other. The further they are from each other, the wider the output usually seems as each microphone is exposed to a different amount of time (doppler shift), volume and spectral alterations. Additionally when this value is above 100% and the microphones cannot be any further away from each other, a digital widening is applied.
Now in MRotary, there is a microphone diagram to the right. I gues when they are completely together or apart, this will simulate 0% to 100% respectively. Then anything above 100% would be made up with the "widening" control.
Jason @ Melda Production