They have these new things called "glasses"......you should try them. Work wonders for me.wagtunes wrote: My screen resolution is 1280 x 1024. I don't care what other people can or can't see. I'm 58 years old and my eyes aren't the best as it is. I can show you a screen print of what Sylenth1 looks like on my monitor. Maybe you can read it. Doesn't matter. I can't. And if I can't read it, I can't program it.
It's that simple.
Is the Sylenth 1 still good?
- KVRAF
- 19781 posts since 16 Sep, 2001 from Las Vegas,USA
None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
- KVRAF
- 22872 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
Wise ass, I wear glasses. They only help so much.Teksonik wrote:They have these new things called "glasses"......you should try them. Work wonders for me.wagtunes wrote: My screen resolution is 1280 x 1024. I don't care what other people can or can't see. I'm 58 years old and my eyes aren't the best as it is. I can show you a screen print of what Sylenth1 looks like on my monitor. Maybe you can read it. Doesn't matter. I can't. And if I can't read it, I can't program it.
It's that simple.
Maybe you'd like to have my eyes and my problems for a day. No? I didn't so.
I can't see the GUI well enough to use it.
End of story!
-
- KVRian
- 1182 posts since 11 Sep, 2015
well here's the deal. it's fairly simple. Sylenth has some of the most purely digital oscillators ever. it takes a fair amount of processing to make them lose their cliché computer-drawn appearance on the oscilloscope. some people think all soft synths are like that - they're not, that's kind of rare. the thing is, raw digital audio done right sounds pretty great. you will obviously have a more prominent instrument when every harmonic is always exactly at the same level forever.
but Harmor is a lot better at all of that.
but Harmor is a lot better at all of that.
-
fluffy_little_something fluffy_little_something https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=281847
- Banned
- 12880 posts since 5 Jun, 2012
Afaik the GUI of the new version can be resized.
I can't read those labels, either, currently, but I know them all by heart now, so it doesn't matter. I would welcome a bigger value readout in the display, though.
I can't read those labels, either, currently, but I know them all by heart now, so it doesn't matter. I would welcome a bigger value readout in the display, though.
-
fluffy_little_something fluffy_little_something https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=281847
- Banned
- 12880 posts since 5 Jun, 2012
I don't know whether the fact that waveforms look perfect has much of an impact on the sound. I think the characteristic sound of a synth comes mostly from its filter. In Sylenth's case I like the 4-pole filter much more than the 2-pole one.acYm wrote:well here's the deal. it's fairly simple. Sylenth has some of the most purely digital oscillators ever. it takes a fair amount of processing to make them lose their cliché computer-drawn appearance on the oscilloscope. some people think all soft synths are like that - they're not, that's kind of rare. the thing is, raw digital audio done right sounds pretty great. you will obviously have a more prominent instrument when every harmonic is always exactly at the same level forever.
but Harmor is a lot better at all of that.
- KVRAF
- 19781 posts since 16 Sep, 2001 from Las Vegas,USA
Calm down dude.wagtunes wrote: Wise ass, I wear glasses. They only help so much.
Maybe you'd like to have my eyes and my problems for a day. No? I didn't so.
I can't see the GUI well enough to use it.
End of story!
You know nothing of my problems so you might not want to trade even for a day.....
I suppose that's a good enough excuse. You've been against Sylenth for a long time. First it was too expensive, now it's on sale but you can't see it.......whatever. You don't like it....lots of people do....and the world goes on..........wagtunes wrote:I can't see the GUI well enough to use it.
None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
-
- KVRAF
- 35671 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
wagtunes wrote:Wise ass, I wear glasses. They only help so much.Teksonik wrote:They have these new things called "glasses"......you should try them. Work wonders for me.wagtunes wrote: My screen resolution is 1280 x 1024. I don't care what other people can or can't see. I'm 58 years old and my eyes aren't the best as it is. I can show you a screen print of what Sylenth1 looks like on my monitor. Maybe you can read it. Doesn't matter. I can't. And if I can't read it, I can't program it.
It's that simple.
Maybe you'd like to have my eyes and my problems for a day. No? I didn't so.
I can't see the GUI well enough to use it.
End of story!
Liked those posts.
- KVRAF
- 19781 posts since 16 Sep, 2001 from Las Vegas,USA
I just googled Sylenth 1 skins.....I've never seen this one before but the Scott Kane skin I'm using is far more pleasing than the default.

I'm viewing this on my laptop at the moment....really easy to read. I might try to find this one.....

I'm viewing this on my laptop at the moment....really easy to read. I might try to find this one.....
None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
-
fluffy_little_something fluffy_little_something https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=281847
- Banned
- 12880 posts since 5 Jun, 2012
The orange looks a bit cheap
And the displays are even harder to read.
What color is layer 2?
And the displays are even harder to read.
What color is layer 2?
-
- KVRAF
- 35671 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
No idea how it is in regards of readability, but i found this skin quite awesome:

Btw, it has been proposed before, but i think one should not disregard the built-in Windows screen magnifying features, if one has problems with reading GUI elements. It may be a bit more tedious, but then, why not give it a go instead of disregarding software just because their GUI element are hard to read.

Btw, it has been proposed before, but i think one should not disregard the built-in Windows screen magnifying features, if one has problems with reading GUI elements. It may be a bit more tedious, but then, why not give it a go instead of disregarding software just because their GUI element are hard to read.
-
- KVRian
- 1182 posts since 11 Sep, 2015
that's another of sylenth's particularities, the waveforms are so rigidly digital that filtering doesn't affect them quite like other synths. they keep their basic shape deeper into the cutoff than usual. /fluffy_little_something wrote:I don't know whether the fact that waveforms look perfect has much of an impact on the sound. I think the characteristic sound of a synth comes mostly from its filter. In Sylenth's case I like the 4-pole filter much more than the 2-pole one.
that serum theme does look sweet.
-
fluffy_little_something fluffy_little_something https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=281847
- Banned
- 12880 posts since 5 Jun, 2012
I think the new default skin looks very good, LD should make one ideal skin and prevent hacks and user skinning. A professional plugin doesn't need superficial things such as user skins.
-
fluffy_little_something fluffy_little_something https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=281847
- Banned
- 12880 posts since 5 Jun, 2012
And is that a good or a bad thing?acYm wrote:that's another of sylenth's particularities, the waveforms are so rigidly digital that filtering doesn't affect them quite like other synths. they keep their basic shape deeper into the cutoff than usual. /fluffy_little_something wrote:I don't know whether the fact that waveforms look perfect has much of an impact on the sound. I think the characteristic sound of a synth comes mostly from its filter. In Sylenth's case I like the 4-pole filter much more than the 2-pole one.
- KVRAF
- 19781 posts since 16 Sep, 2001 from Las Vegas,USA
I thought you'd like the orange since it reminds one of a Roland synth. I've downloaded the resource files but until the Windows version that allows user skinning is released I won't be able to try this one (not going to hack the .dll and replace all the resource files).fluffy_little_something wrote:The orange looks a bit cheap![]()
And the displays are even harder to read.
What color is layer 2?
It doesn't look like there is a separate page for Layer 2 color but that's not something I would need. I suppose it wouldn't be hard to create a variation for Layer 2. Won't know until I see the new skinning system.
Seriously, Google "Sylenth 1 skins".....there are a lot more than I remember. Some look really cool, some look really hideous. I guess it's down to personal taste as to which is which.........
None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
