Bitwig

takaii · Post by **takaii** » Tue Jan 26, 2016 2:44 pm

Geek Model wrote:We will see another updates before 2.0 or next update will be 2.0? Just want to know.

Well there have been talk about 2.0 now from dom. but i wont expect it anytime soon. Seem to be a lot of work. But atleast theuy are at it

codec17 · Post by **codec17** » Tue Jan 26, 2016 3:16 pm

Geek Model wrote:We will see another updates before 2.0 or next update will be 2.0? Just want to know.

Sure hope for some updates BEFORE 2.0.
Its repaired here and its broken again on the other end. Well thats coding i guess, wich im certaintly not.
Got some major crashes in the .6 update, wich i hadnt before... (yes yes... tech support

did it)
And im not waiting for the 2.0.

I just want to make music!

pdxindy · Post by **pdxindy** » Tue Jan 26, 2016 6:20 pm

I assume they will keep focused on the bug fixing...

mosska · Post by **mosska** » Tue Jan 26, 2016 7:37 pm

PresetNoob wrote:
and there is no problem with the attack.. was just pointing out to GeekModel that 1ms would be correct

How so? if the waveform gets changed and looks different then in original sample...its a problem or not?

codec17 · Post by **codec17** » Tue Jan 26, 2016 7:55 pm

mosska wrote:
PresetNoob wrote:
and there is no problem with the attack.. was just pointing out to GeekModel that 1ms would be correct

How so? if the waveform gets changed and looks different then in original sample...its a problem or not?

Must be that oldskool vibe where he talking about... whatever that is...
And yes 0ms. +1!

PresetNoob · Post by **PresetNoob** » Tue Jan 26, 2016 8:59 pm

codec17 wrote:
mosska wrote:
PresetNoob wrote:
and there is no problem with the attack.. was just pointing out to GeekModel that 1ms would be correct

How so? if the waveform gets changed and looks different then in original sample...its a problem or not?
Must be that oldskool vibe where he talking about... whatever that is...
And yes 0ms. +1!

What? No. 0ms would be incorrect lol

If you don't want there to be a small ramp (remember when ZOOMED in by 1/65536

) then what you should be requesting is for there to be a One-Shot mode. Not for the attack to say 0ms.

It is like that for a reason, the Bitwig guys know what they're doing.

One-Shot ≠ ADSR

c-wave · Post by **c-wave** » Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:53 pm

PresetNoob wrote:
codec17 wrote:
mosska wrote:
PresetNoob wrote:
and there is no problem with the attack.. was just pointing out to GeekModel that 1ms would be correct

How so? if the waveform gets changed and looks different then in original sample...its a problem or not?
Must be that oldskool vibe where he talking about... whatever that is...
And yes 0ms. +1!
What? No. 0ms would be incorrect lol

If you don't want there to be a small ramp (remember when ZOOMED in by 1/65536 ) then what you should be requesting is for there to be a One-Shot mode. Not for the attack to say 0ms.

It is like that for a reason, the Bitwig guys know what they're doing.

One-Shot ≠ ADSR

Hey PresetNoob, I am a noob here, would you please point me to an article that would explain this to me ?

Thx.

Andrei Marchenko · Post by **Andrei Marchenko** » Tue Jan 26, 2016 10:47 pm

takaii wrote:
Geek Model wrote:We will see another updates before 2.0 or next update will be 2.0? Just want to know.
Well there have been talk about 2.0 now from dom. but i wont expect it anytime soon. Seem to be a lot of work. But at least they are at it

I don't want 2.0 now. Just want to know about it and minor updates because 2.0 will be paid update and if all new features will be in 2.0 it's not good because since 1.0 we have only two new major features - Groups and Choke in DM.

klavierr · Post by **klavierr** » Tue Jan 26, 2016 11:57 pm

It's highly unlikely that 2.0 will be the next release. The team are still working on bugfixing, and 1.x releases usually come with a few feature additions anyway.

Cyoon · Post by **Cyoon** » Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:41 am

Geek Model wrote:
takaii wrote:
Geek Model wrote:We will see another updates before 2.0 or next update will be 2.0? Just want to know.
Well there have been talk about 2.0 now from dom. but i wont expect it anytime soon. Seem to be a lot of work. But at least they are at it
I don't want 2.0 now. Just want to know about it and minor updates because 2.0 will be paid update and if all new features will be in 2.0 it's not good because since 1.0 we have only two new major features - Groups and Choke in DM.

and the browser, flexible buffer, custom shortcuts and MPE

Andrei Marchenko · Post by **Andrei Marchenko** » Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:57 am

OMG custom shortcuts? lol This thing must be by default! MPE? Are you using it?

Just want to know how much people here really need MPE instead fully functional sampler device or ability to create track delay in -/+ ms or reduced load time or ability to copy automation in audio events

New browser that can't preview samples? lol That thing reminds me Apple and stylus for iPad in 2016

WE CREATED STYLUS! LOVE US!

Cyoon · Post by **Cyoon** » Wed Jan 27, 2016 7:08 am

why don't you sell it if you are that unsatisfied? All i hear from you is moaning day in day out. Does that make you happy?

Andrei Marchenko · Post by **Andrei Marchenko** » Wed Jan 27, 2016 7:16 am

I can't sell it because i won it in online competition and my version is NFR

I'm complaining? No! Sometimes i think that i'm the only one who see real situation instead of 95% of fanboys here

All your messages sounds like: "Thanks Bitwig's devs that we are still in paid beta test after 2 years of release! We don't need all that functions that essential for every major DAW! All that we need is a new interface layout for touchscreen and MPE functions."

shonoob · Post by **shonoob** » Wed Jan 27, 2016 7:34 am

Geek Model wrote:I can't sell it because i won it in online competition and my version is NFR I'm complaining? No! Sometimes i think that i'm the only one who see real situation instead of 95% of fanboys here

All your messages sounds like: "Thanks Bitwig's devs that we are still in paid beta test after 2 years of release! We don't need all that functions that essential for every major DAW! All that we need is a new interface layout for touchscreen and MPE functions."

tbh I agree with this very much. especially the first sentence

Cyoon · Post by **Cyoon** » Wed Jan 27, 2016 7:38 am

well, your perception of reality is quite interesting.

Geek Model wrote:

- still no ability to paint straight lines for crescendo in velocity editor
- still no ability to copy automation in audio file
- still can't remember size of side browser after you closed program or even with template project
- still we have not options to Turn On sample preview by default in side browser
- still can't preview sample in Pop Up browser
- still can't change time signature from BARs to simple timeline in arranger
- still can't save default preset for in-build plugins
- still can't set delay for sounds in ms
- still problems with automation snap to the grid
For example..

Geek Model wrote:lol This topic so in time. Just loaded mixing session with 90 audio tracks (no FX) - just want to say goodbye Bitwig for serious mixing projects. Also when i count loading time for empty template i want to cry. Please just load Cockos Reaper once and see how it should be! Even shittest Logic working faster than Bugwig!

Geek Model wrote:That's what strange for me here - Bitwig's sampler do not imulate any analog stuff.

that is like 98% of your posts, not just complaining you are right, it's even insulting at times.

If you find a bug or want a feature, then write to support.

Bitwig

KVR Audio

Bitwig Studio 1.3.6