agreeddeastman wrote:I had forgotten about the audio to midi feature. I'm not sure if I ever used that.
I'm surprised that modern DAWs don't all have the ability to manage multiple sequences in one project. That really seems like such an obvious feature. I spend a lot of time in Adobe software such as After Effects and Premiere Pro, and they allow you to have multiple timelines and nest them inside each other. Even Audition has multiple timeline management. I'm not sure why this isn't common in DAWs.
Opcode Studio Vision
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 5175 posts since 29 Apr, 2006
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 5175 posts since 29 Apr, 2006
For those who want to try it. looks like the windows version will work up to xp sp3
Vision Application and Support Files
"As the Gibson/Opcode.com site seems to no longer exist, I'm posting the Vision Application and related files of interest as a public service to current Vision users unless forbidden by Gibson to do so. All files have had PACE copy protection removed (legally-don't worry)."
http://web.archive.org/web/200902111714 ... ision.html
Vision Application and Support Files
"As the Gibson/Opcode.com site seems to no longer exist, I'm posting the Vision Application and related files of interest as a public service to current Vision users unless forbidden by Gibson to do so. All files have had PACE copy protection removed (legally-don't worry)."
http://web.archive.org/web/200902111714 ... ision.html
-
- KVRAF
- 3071 posts since 29 Sep, 2005
That's very nice of you, memyselfandus!
<additional comments deleted>
<additional comments deleted>
Last edited by dsan@mail.com on Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
My DAW System:
W7, i5, x64, 8Gb Ram, Edirol FA-101
W7, i5, x64, 8Gb Ram, Edirol FA-101
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 5175 posts since 29 Apr, 2006
Thank you
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 5175 posts since 29 Apr, 2006
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 5175 posts since 29 Apr, 2006
https://www.namm.org/library/oral-histo ... -oppenheim
Dave Oppenheim is the founder of Opcode Systems, a Palo Alto, California software company that pioneered MIDI sequencing for MAC OS and Microsoft Windows. With Dave’s programming, the company created such software products as Vision, Studio Vision, Galaxy and Max. Among the many users for Dave’s programming were professional musicians such as Herbie Hancock and Thomas Dolby who used the music sequencing on live and recorded performances. Opcode was sold to Gibson Guitars in 1998, which stopped production of its Opcode products the following year.
Dave Oppenheim is the founder of Opcode Systems, a Palo Alto, California software company that pioneered MIDI sequencing for MAC OS and Microsoft Windows. With Dave’s programming, the company created such software products as Vision, Studio Vision, Galaxy and Max. Among the many users for Dave’s programming were professional musicians such as Herbie Hancock and Thomas Dolby who used the music sequencing on live and recorded performances. Opcode was sold to Gibson Guitars in 1998, which stopped production of its Opcode products the following year.
-
- KVRAF
- 6159 posts since 4 Dec, 2004
I wonder what companies do with old source code like that, if they just put it in a vault somewhere and forget about it or if they try to sell it or something. I also wonder if whatever they developed it in X years ago is still something viable now or if they'd have to kinda mostly rebuild it if they brought it back.
It is interesting to look back though, like looking back at Cubase X years ago and see it doing some things it doesn't do now, like switching it's audio tracks mono/stereo.
It is interesting to look back though, like looking back at Cubase X years ago and see it doing some things it doesn't do now, like switching it's audio tracks mono/stereo.
- KVRAF
- 11162 posts since 16 Mar, 2003 from Porto - Portugal
Don't be fooled. The Windows version was way behind the Mac version (was still at 2.5, while the Mac version was at 3.5). For example: the Windows version was MIDI only while the Mac version had native audio capabilities since version 2.0. But it may be good to test the Vision way of dealing with MIDI.dsan@mail.com wrote:That's very nice of you, memyselfandus!
<additional comments deleted>
Fernando (FMR)
-
- KVRist
- 72 posts since 4 Jul, 2007
Probably best to ignore the Windows version and just pretend it didn't happen. From memory, it was midi only, very limited and totally unstable. If anyone is interested, the last Mac version can still be found on-line and works fine on older Macs running System 9.
Audio to midi was primitive but (barely) usable. It was the late 90's after all. Ableton Live wasn't even a twinkle in someone's eye and I don't think PT even had midi tracks.
Things we take for granted today were cutting edge or unimaginable back then. I'm pretty sure the first time I saw audio and midi running together in the same software was at launch function for SVP. That was mind-blowing at the time.
Audio to midi was primitive but (barely) usable. It was the late 90's after all. Ableton Live wasn't even a twinkle in someone's eye and I don't think PT even had midi tracks.
Things we take for granted today were cutting edge or unimaginable back then. I'm pretty sure the first time I saw audio and midi running together in the same software was at launch function for SVP. That was mind-blowing at the time.
- KVRAF
- 14477 posts since 16 Feb, 2005 from Planet Earth, Somewhere
Yeah the Windows version was an experiment. I think not many people bought it and it was dropped.
Gibson supposedly has the source code. If any of the programmers still have it, they won't admit it
.
As Gibson if I remember correctly became very litigious about it.
Dave O went to work at Pro Tools after. Not sure if he is still there, but I am always surprised he didn't have a greater input to ProTools Midi. Not sure how come.
rsp
Gibson supposedly has the source code. If any of the programmers still have it, they won't admit it
As Gibson if I remember correctly became very litigious about it.
Dave O went to work at Pro Tools after. Not sure if he is still there, but I am always surprised he didn't have a greater input to ProTools Midi. Not sure how come.
rsp
sound sculptist
-
- KVRist
- 346 posts since 26 Sep, 2009
How would you get sound out of it since there wasn't vst back then (at least to my knowledge there wasn't)??? Besides using Hardware was there Internal Sounds from the Mac and cd-roms or ? Im a bit late to the game here with this daw but find this one Fascinating! 
- KVRAF
- 11162 posts since 16 Mar, 2003 from Porto - Portugal
Yes, there was already VST in 1999, and Vision was supporting it. But the audio engine had nothing to do with VST. Vision was the first to have MIDI and audio running in the same application. Cubase and Digital Performer get on only a few years after. Logic was the last one of the "big four" (as I called them back then) to enter the game.ls1xxx wrote:How would you get sound out of it since there wasn't vst back then (at least to my knowledge there wasn't)??? Besides using Hardware was there Internal Sounds from the Mac and cd-roms or ? Im a bit late to the game here with this daw but find this one Fascinating!
BTW: Chris Halaby, which is one of the Chief Officers of KVR, was the president of Opcode in those glorious days.
Last edited by fmr on Wed Jan 27, 2016 9:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Fernando (FMR)
-
- KVRAF
- 7540 posts since 7 Aug, 2003 from San Francisco Bay Area
Audio was mostly provided by Digidesign hardware. I had an Audiomedia 2 (3?) card for that.ls1xxx wrote:How would you get sound out of it since there wasn't vst back then (at least to my knowledge there wasn't)??? Besides using Hardware was there Internal Sounds from the Mac and cd-roms or ? Im a bit late to the game here with this daw but find this one Fascinating!
Incomplete list of my gear: 1/8" audio input jack.
- KVRAF
- 11162 posts since 16 Mar, 2003 from Porto - Portugal
In the end, Vision was already able to use any hardware, including the built-in audio of the Macs (which was already 16-bit). But yes, it was mainly Digidesign hardware, and DAE, which was the audio engine behind that, was written by Digi to keep track counting artificially down, in order to prevent competition with the big systems (while you could do 16 tracks with a pro Tools III system, you could only have 4 track with an Audiomedia II or III. OTOH, if you were using the Mac built-in audio, you could jump to the same 16 tracks.deastman wrote:Audio was mostly provided by Digidesign hardware. I had an Audiomedia 2 (3?) card for that.ls1xxx wrote:How would you get sound out of it since there wasn't vst back then (at least to my knowledge there wasn't)??? Besides using Hardware was there Internal Sounds from the Mac and cd-roms or ? Im a bit late to the game here with this daw but find this one Fascinating!
Last edited by fmr on Wed Jan 27, 2016 9:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Fernando (FMR)
-
- KVRAF
- 7540 posts since 7 Aug, 2003 from San Francisco Bay Area
I once met a guy who worked for Gibson here in the bay area. He said that he and another guy still had the source code for Vision and were making periodic modifications to their own personal copies. I can only assume that too faded into the mists of time eventually.LawrenceF wrote:I wonder what companies do with old source code like that, if they just put it in a vault somewhere and forget about it or if they try to sell it or something. I also wonder if whatever they developed it in X years ago is still something viable now or if they'd have to kinda mostly rebuild it if they brought it back.
It is interesting to look back though, like looking back at Cubase X years ago and see it doing some things it doesn't do now, like switching it's audio tracks mono/stereo.
Incomplete list of my gear: 1/8" audio input jack.