Tone2 will release Icarus - 3D WaveTable Synthesizer
-
Mac of BIOnighT Mac of BIOnighT https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=70598
- KVRAF
- 2521 posts since 3 Jun, 2005 from Italy
Guys, relax, I think Markus knows all the above and more and knows what he's doing, so just breathe deeply and calm down everybody, OK? We're all friends here 
-
- KVRAF
- 35671 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
I wouldn't say it's a big deal either, especially as it only has been mentioned in a FB post. But you know how it is, a new Tone2 synth is coming, and the haters gotta find something to niggle about it.Mac of BIOnighT wrote:Guys, relax, I think Markus knows all the above and more and knows what he's doing, so just breathe deeply and calm down everybody, OK? We're all friends here
-
Mac of BIOnighT Mac of BIOnighT https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=70598
- KVRAF
- 2521 posts since 3 Jun, 2005 from Italy
Satanic rituals? ;-Pchk071 wrote:If Tone2 don't bring some concrete news soon, god knows what will be next.
(actually, that'd be cool
- KVRAF
- 6466 posts since 18 Jul, 2008 from New York
I understand that Tone2's filter algorithms are complete different than Emu's. There is no possibility of patent infringement.Ingonator wrote: Independent of this will be used in the future or not you simply did not get that the way how the term "z-plane" was used by Tone2 is not related to the E-Mu filters but just a general way to describe certain complex filters as i alraedy tried to explain (and was also mentioend in the quote from Markus).
However, there could be trademark infringement in the U.S. since it creates confusion in the mind of customers like FMR around the trademarked term "Z-Plane".
Patents are an invention. Trademarks are branding - words or images associated with a product.
This is really a tempest in a teacup. It doesn't help that a lot of people don't understand what a trademark is.
In any case, I am looking forward to trying out this synth. It looks very promising.
-
- KVRist
- 274 posts since 27 May, 2013 from Leesburg, VA
z-plane is a math term, I'm sure I used it in college math
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_plane
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_plane
- KVRAF
- 1794 posts since 9 Apr, 2011
This is defensible. Could disqualify it from being a trademark as it's a common term as opposed to an arbitrary one and therefore not "inherently distinctive"synzh wrote:z-plane is a math term, I'm sure I used it in college math
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_plane
(Disclaimer: any legal knowledge I have applies to U.S. law)
"musician."
http://soundcloud.com/nine-of-kings
http://soundcloud.com/nine-of-kings
- KVRAF
- 6466 posts since 18 Jul, 2008 from New York
I disagree. E-mu has a live US trademark on "Z-Plane" that is strongly associated with their brand of synths and this could cause confusion in customers' minds.nineofkings wrote: This is defensible. Could disqualify it from being a trademark as it's a common term as opposed to an arbitrary one and therefore not "inherently distinctive"
I think the discussion is academic since Dave Rossum (founder of E-mu) and Markus have better things to do with their time. But if Markus wanted to be safe, he would use a different term in his marketing including his Facebook posts.

-
Mac of BIOnighT Mac of BIOnighT https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=70598
- KVRAF
- 2521 posts since 3 Jun, 2005 from Italy
That's not the word, it's the logo. The copyright you posted is on the logo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wordmark not on the word.
- KVRAF
- 6466 posts since 18 Jul, 2008 from New York
Did you read the Wikipedia link?Mac of BIOnighT wrote:That's not the word, it's the logo. The copyright you posted is on the logo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wordmark not on the word.
In the United States, the term wordmark may not only refer to the graphical representation, but the text itself may be a type of trademark.
-
Mac of BIOnighT Mac of BIOnighT https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=70598
- KVRAF
- 2521 posts since 3 Jun, 2005 from Italy
Yes, I did read it, but "may" doesn't mean "certainly does". I'm no expert, but in this case I believe it refers to the logo, not the term, while it's probably the case with "Coca Cola". If what other people said is correct (z-plane is a mathematical function), you can't copyright it, no more than you could copyright the name "mineral water". Again, I'm no expert, but I do not think Yamaha copyrighted the term FM, as I see it everywhere, and the reason is that FM is a physics thing, not an invented name. Either that, or they couldn't be bothered to sue all the people who used it.
Anyway, if this is really important, maybe somebody could dig up some other document that doesn't lend itself to misleading interpretation and solve the dispute
Anyway, if this is really important, maybe somebody could dig up some other document that doesn't lend itself to misleading interpretation and solve the dispute
-
Mac of BIOnighT Mac of BIOnighT https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=70598
- KVRAF
- 2521 posts since 3 Jun, 2005 from Italy
Mac of BIOnighT wrote:Yes, I did read it, but "may" doesn't mean "certainly does". I'm no expert, but in this case I believe it refers to the logo, not the term, while that's probably the case with "Coca Cola". If what other people said is correct (z-plane is a mathematical function), you can't copyright it, no more than you could copyright the name "mineral water". Again, I'm no expert, but I do not think Yamaha copyrighted the term FM, as I see it everywhere, and the reason is that FM is a physics thing, not an invented name. Either that, or they couldn't be bothered to sue all the people who used it.
Anyway, if this is really important, maybe somebody could dig up some other document that doesn't lend itself to misleading interpretation and solve the dispute
-
Mac of BIOnighT Mac of BIOnighT https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=70598
- KVRAF
- 2521 posts since 3 Jun, 2005 from Italy
Mac of BIOnighT wrote:Mac of BIOnighT wrote:Yes, I did read it, but "may" doesn't mean "certainly does". I'm no expert, but in this case I believe it refers to the logo, not the term, while that's probably the case with "Coca Cola". If what other people said is correct (z-plane is a mathematical function), you can't copyright it, no more than you could copyright the name "mineral water". Again, I'm no expert, but I do not think Yamaha copyrighted the term FM, as I see it everywhere, and the reason is that FM is a physics thing, not an invented name. Either that, or they couldn't be bothered to sue all the people who used it.
Anyway, if this is really important, maybe somebody could dig up some other document that doesn't lend itself to misleading interpretations and solve the dispute
-
- KVRist
- 394 posts since 29 Nov, 2012
Anyone mind if I look out of my Windows?Mac of BIOnighT wrote:Yes, I did read it, but "may" doesn't mean "certainly does". I'm no expert, but in this case I believe it refers to the logo, not the term, while it's probably the case with "Coca Cola". If what other people said is correct (z-plane is a mathematical function), you can't copyright it, no more than you could copyright the name "mineral water". Again, I'm no expert, but I do not think Yamaha copyrighted the term FM, as I see it everywhere, and the reason is that FM is a physics thing, not an invented name. Either that, or they couldn't be bothered to sue all the people who used it.
Anyway, if this is really important, maybe somebody could dig up some other document that doesn't lend itself to misleading interpretation and solve the dispute
None of the really dumb people I knew when I was young are young any more.
- KVRAF
- 6466 posts since 18 Jul, 2008 from New York
You certainly aren't an expert because now you're mixing up copyrights and trademarks.Mac of BIOnighT wrote:Yes, I did read it, but "may" doesn't mean "certainly does". I'm no expert, but in this case I believe it refers to the logo, not the term, while it's probably the case with "Coca Cola". If what other people said is correct (z-plane is a mathematical function), you can't copyright it, no more than you could copyright the name "mineral water".
If you look at the screenshot I posted before, you will see it says:
Mark Drawing Code (1) TYPED DRAWING
This is explained on many websites. Here is a concise explanation:
https://www.quora.com/How-do-you-determ ... nd-or-logo

It is crystal clear. E-mu has a live trademark in the U.S. on the words "Z-Plane" for synthesizers. This is most definitely not a logo trademark.
I am bored of this discussion. Let's get some Icarus demo sounds soon please.
