MeldaProduction

pone · Post by **pone** » Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:44 pm

I wish there would be an additional multiparameter pane that would be made for the sole purpose of automating the effects section, 8 Is such a small number.

I know that a lot of people would want to keep things simple, so maybe, alternatively something similar to the MXXX changes of 9.21 could be done.
Instead of having things like automation of sub parameters of the multiparameter, e.g. the range of the first few targets of the multiparameter, why not simply have more multiparameters?
In the event of wanting to automate that range, you can still just bind a free multiparameter to that sub parameter.

Happy 9.22

MeldaProduction · Post by **MeldaProduction** » Sun Apr 10, 2016 8:03 pm

Well, we'll see what the crowd will say

.

jmg8 · Post by **jmg8** » Sun Apr 10, 2016 8:05 pm

You could open PowerSynth in MXXX and have 100 multiparameters!

MeldaProduction · Post by **MeldaProduction** » Sun Apr 10, 2016 8:08 pm

Hehe true

pone · Post by **pone** » Sun Apr 10, 2016 8:30 pm

jmg8 wrote:You could open PowerSynth in MXXX and have 100 multiparameters!

Not quite the same :p

jmg8 · Post by **jmg8** » Sun Apr 10, 2016 8:31 pm

pone wrote:
jmg8 wrote:You could open PowerSynth in MXXX and have 100 multiparameters!
Not quite the same :p

How is it not the same? It's actually better.

pone · Post by **pone** » Sun Apr 10, 2016 8:34 pm

Then Powersynth would not have automation of all of its parameters by touch automation, you'd need to bind them first.

jmg8 · Post by **jmg8** » Sun Apr 10, 2016 8:40 pm

Ah, ok I see.

Tagirijus · Post by **Tagirijus** » Mon Apr 11, 2016 8:09 am

You should have added just "yes" or "no" for a more clear result, hehe. I am for "no", since I think that in MYYY there will be more multiparameters like in MXXX. Vojtech should concentrate on MYYY instead of adding more multiparameters to MPS, in my opinioin. Moreover I have never really used 8 multiparameters in MPS, so my opinion is also a bit personal though.

jmg8 · Post by **jmg8** » Mon Apr 11, 2016 8:28 am

I want more MPs and MODs in MPS however I'm not sure where they would fit? Is there room?
Also it might be worth just waiting for MYYY?

pone · Post by **pone** » Mon Apr 11, 2016 9:17 am

Tagirijus wrote:You should have added just "yes" or "no" for a more clear result, hehe. I am for "no", since I think that in MYYY there will be more multiparameters like in MXXX. Vojtech should concentrate on MYYY instead of adding more multiparameters to MPS, in my opinioin. Moreover I have never really used 8 multiparameters in MPS, so my opinion is also a bit personal though.

I think that falls under "No, MPowersynth is complicated enough"

Increasing the number of multi parameters would certainly be a small blip on Vojtech's plugin writing time.
MYYY at the moment is very nebulous, both in features and release date.

jmg8 wrote:I want more MPs and MODs in MPS however I'm not sure where they would fit? Is there room?

Could work the same way it is in mxxx right now: a pane with a scrollbar you can hide.

DarkStar · Post by **DarkStar** » Mon Apr 11, 2016 9:47 am

^^^^
Hmm, but then you might ask for more than 4 in the effects plug-in too

(Or is that just me

I misuse Multiparameters - as a way of putting a few controls on the Easy screen, each MP only controls 1 parameter.)

Tagirijus · Post by **Tagirijus** » Mon Apr 11, 2016 2:04 pm

pone wrote:MYYY at the moment is very nebulous, both in features and release date.

Release date probably, but features: I think it will mostly be like MXXX, just as a generator plugin.

pone · Post by **pone** » Mon Apr 11, 2016 5:32 pm

Tagirijus wrote:
pone wrote:MYYY at the moment is very nebulous, both in features and release date.
Release date probably, but features: I think it will mostly be like MXXX, just as a generator plugin.

Well "I think" is the keyword here, isn't it?

What will the "modules" be? Powersynth instances and effects? Then that is literally just powersynth/mxxx with a polythonic effects section (the effects section will be created for each triggered note). I don't think so, its probably not the most efficient thing in the world.
Therefore I don't think it's right to make decisions based on our speculation of what myyy will be.

Tagirijus · Post by **Tagirijus** » Mon Apr 11, 2016 5:53 pm

pone wrote: Well "I think" is the keyword here, isn't it?

Actually Vojtech already mentioned on some several threads that MYYY will mostly be like MXXX.

pone wrote: What will the "modules" be?

I am sure: at least all the modules you have in MXXX right now.

pone wrote:Then that is literally just powersynth/mxxx with a polythonic effects section

I'd find this really monstreous and great already.

pone wrote: Therefore I don't think it's right to make decisions based on our speculation of what myyy will be.

But based on the developers words. You should search the form for MYYY to find out more.

MeldaProduction

KVR Audio

FR: MPowersynth [poll] more multiparameters or a better way to automate the effects section

Should changes be made for parameter automation of the effects section in MPowersynth?