From https://tone2.com/html/our%20team.html:chk071 wrote:Actually Electra2's manual also lists Bastiaan van Noord as a developer alongside Markus.
Bastiaan van Noord - Sound design, Support, Testing, PR management
He's not a developer.
From https://tone2.com/html/our%20team.html:chk071 wrote:Actually Electra2's manual also lists Bastiaan van Noord as a developer alongside Markus.
Yes that's all I was trying to ask about updates, from what I see of their history the pattern suggests something different to what their marketing says re Icaruschk071 wrote:And yes, i do get the point about releasing new stuff, and few updates for the existing stuff a bit. I don't see there's much wrong with Electra2 though, really. As db3 said, usually they don't add many, if any features to their existing synths, but rather release a new major version, which is a paid upgrade. So, don't expect any updates with new features. It could be, but i wouldn't count on it. The way i see it, you pay for what there is.
Not questioning the support part, just whether this is something given their history that can be believed or is just a marketing claim but to be taken with a pinch of salt.Icarus comes with free personal support as well as frequent, free updates and improvements.
That is just marketing BS... (like the claim that Icarus can do "literally everything").aMUSEd wrote:Not questioning the support part, just whether this is something given their history that can be believed or is just a marketing claim but to be taken with a pinch of salt.Icarus comes with free personal support as well as frequent, free updates and improvements.
In fairness I own Saurus and they came out with one feature update but it wasn't an incremental it was v2. The problem is they wanted $70.00 for that update and I declined. I bought TAL U NO LX for $60.00 and quite frankly it sounds 10x more analog than Saurus ever did from my perspective. I'm still holding out hope that Icarus is a winner.pdxindy wrote:That is just marketing BS... (like the claim that Icarus can do "literally everything").aMUSEd wrote:Not questioning the support part, just whether this is something given their history that can be believed or is just a marketing claim but to be taken with a pinch of salt.Icarus comes with free personal support as well as frequent, free updates and improvements.
Tone2 will fix bugs and issue compatibility updates for OS changes for existing synths. Beyond that, users should not expect feature updates. Occasionally there might be a feature update, but users should not expect it. There is a pretty clear track record in that regard.
I thought I was the only I person who thought Saurus was a fail.Doc Brown wrote:In fairness I own Saurus and they came out with one feature update but it wasn't an incremental it was v2. The problem is they wanted $70.00 for that update and I declined. I bought TAL U NO LX for $60.00 and quite frankly it sounds 10x more analog than Saurus ever did from my perspective. I'm still holding out hope that Icarus is a winner.pdxindy wrote:That is just marketing BS... (like the claim that Icarus can do "literally everything").aMUSEd wrote:Not questioning the support part, just whether this is something given their history that can be believed or is just a marketing claim but to be taken with a pinch of salt.Icarus comes with free personal support as well as frequent, free updates and improvements.
Tone2 will fix bugs and issue compatibility updates for OS changes for existing synths. Beyond that, users should not expect feature updates. Occasionally there might be a feature update, but users should not expect it. There is a pretty clear track record in that regard.
I also think Tone2's analog modeling is unimpressive. Digital is their strong suit.zerocrossing wrote:I thought I was the only I person who thought Saurus was a fail.
Agreed!!! I find that all the tone 2 Synths I own have all been really stable and extremly cpu light and Saurus is certainly no exception. I like its sound and honestly when I think of the term analogue I think of cheesy dtune leads and waterd out soft brassy sounds.. I dont like that eventhough I know Saurus can do that.. but what Saurus does well is nice solid basses and bold leads...ATS wrote:i love saurus but i dont care at all if it sounds "analog" or not, just like it.
Just for the record, Dune2 doesn't sound like a Virus at all (I have both).EnGee wrote:How near the sound to Dune 2? (which I always forget that I have it).
Yesterday I was playing with Dune 2 and I like its clean punchy sounds, among other sounds. It is a great synth no doubt (which I don't know why I always think of Access Virus when I hear it, although I have never owned a Virus!). Of course Dune 2 can do nice FM sounds as well, but its character isn't similar to Blofeld at all (or Largo or even Massive) and of course it is far from Codex. So, I put it in the category of Virus like synths.
Anyway, it would be nice to hear the beta testers comparing Icarus with Dune 2 (or Virus) if they have played with one of them.
Oh. When I listened to the audio demos of Virus, they sound about 80% close to Dune 2. Anyway, judging from the audio demos, sometimes I prefer the Virus and sometimes Dune 2. To me, it means both are great in their own way.recursive one wrote:
Just for the record, Dune2 doesn't sound like a Virus at all (I have both).
Yes, I heard it. For that was my question.I listened to the sound demo posted earlier in this thread by Mac of Bionignt, it indeed sounds somehow similar to Dune2 but punchier a bit.
here is the demo (hope Mac wouldn't mind)
https://soundcloud.com/macnight/icarus-teaser-01
We will seeIngonator said that Icarus will have unison algorithm similar to Virus Hypersaw and probably modelled after it. Also the names of some wavetable morphing modes to be available in Icarus sound like it they are inspired by the Virus formant and graintable oscillators, but I don't know if they indeed act similarly and can make similar sounds
If you are curious, I compared Virus and Dune2 side by side at basic patches having identical structure. They don't sound very alike in these examples. Spire (also included into this comparison) sounds much closer.EnGee wrote: Oh. When I listened to the audio demos of Virus, they sound about 80% close to Dune 2. Anyway, judging from the audio demos, sometimes I prefer the Virus and sometimes Dune 2. To me, it means both are great in their own way.
They are. Dune2 lacks the agressive edgy character of Virus so it is not that good at leads/basses, but it outdoes Virus at big and complex pads/soundcapes.EnGee wrote: To me, it means both are great in their own way.
Thanks for the comparison. I listened carefully two times (I needed two times to know which is whichrecursive one wrote:
If you are curious, I compared Virus and Dune2 side by side at basic patches having identical structure. They don't sound very alike in these examples. Spire (also included into this comparison) sounds much closer.
https://soundcloud.com/recursion-loop/v ... -vs-dune22
They are. Dune2 lacks the agressive edgy character of Virus so it is not that good at leads/basses, but it outdoes Virus at big and complex pads/soundcapes.EnGee wrote: To me, it means both are great in their own way.
Sorry for the OT.
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026