Kraftwerk lose sampling copyright case.

Anything about MUSIC but doesn't fit into the forums above.
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

/* static noise */
Last edited by noiseresearch on Tue Dec 01, 2020 12:57 pm, edited 2 times in total.
It refuses description, allowing only the vague approach of adjectives: dark, light, raw, angelic. Who or what is making these noises? Where are they coming from and what do they point to? What kind of entity can leave such a troubling sonic remnant?

Post

/* static noise */
Last edited by noiseresearch on Tue Dec 01, 2020 12:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
It refuses description, allowing only the vague approach of adjectives: dark, light, raw, angelic. Who or what is making these noises? Where are they coming from and what do they point to? What kind of entity can leave such a troubling sonic remnant?

Post

What an astoundingly forward thinking, even handed, real-world-based ruling.
I am kind of surprised. The legal precedent will cause chaos. Eh, maybe not. Other articles are directly addressing that as being not likely... They must not have enough US lawyers over there... ;)
ImageImageImageImage

Post

Yes. There was panic on the streets tonight. It's a real game changer.
This is the same method MJ used when he was working on Anthony Marinelli's Thriller.

Post

Did you sample all the things?
ImageImageImageImage

Post

Not much interest in this particular example of plagiarism but weren't hip-crap producers such as JZ once known for creating and selling 'beats' ?
I don't exactly know what that means, but it seems to me 'the beat' was 'the' most fundamental part of hip-crap (besides the spiel itself) . Considering this idea, it seems to me Hutter may have a point. :shrug:
....................Don`t blame me for 'The Roots', I just live here. :x
Image

Post

nevermind

Post

resistent wrote:
murnau wrote:
resistent wrote:
murnau wrote:This court is a bunch of idiots
That not true and disrespectful. Go and dig some keynote arbitrations ...
Yep, exactly. That is what this court members should do. :)
Again disrespectful :P
You disqualified yourself anyway to tell others they are disrespectful or even better what is "true" so it doesn't' matter.

It doesn't matter anyway but in your case especially. :)
Whoever wants music instead of noise, joy instead of pleasure, soul instead of gold, creative work instead of business, passion instead of foolery, finds no home in this trivial world of ours.

Post

im just going to put here what i wrote on facebook about this yesterday:

come on kraftwerk...what are you going to do...sue every hip hop and freestyle band ever?

we all know those genres are entirely based on kraftwerk samples. especially freestyle, which unlike hip hop never moved on to more original stuff. kraftwerk was ripped off more than the amen break...it never hurt them. get over it already...its been almost 40 years.

just take the compliment.


to which my buddy responded:

they made money off a tour of robots playing their music, didnt they? Fates been kind enough

yes...fate has been kind enough i think.

Post

As if mankind doesn't have more important stuff to do.

Post

t3toooo wrote:...and argue that stealing is a form of culture?
It absolutely is. Without it culture and innovation would slow down massively. I've heard samples of my music a number of times. It's just gives me a wry smile and a warm fuzzy feeling to be part of the big picture ;)
Mastering from £30 per track \\\
Facebook \\\ #masteredbyloz

Post


Post

skipscada wrote:More complications: http://pitchfork.com/thepitch/1170-just ... t-have-to/

interesting... but i don't particularly agree with the pitchfork author's assertion that it's bieber/skrillex getting the raw end of the deal ... if all she wanted as a writing credit, they probably should have taken that opportunity before it became some court-case/settlement issue.

just listen to the original and the skrillex produced bieber tune ... skrillex was at best, very heavily 'inspired'.. inspired enough to give a writing credit to her, imo. if it goes before a jury they (skrillex/bieber) will lose, for absolute sure - no amount of 'oh, but the pitch of the last note is different' will convince a jury of lay people that skrillex didn't just take the idea from dienel.

whether skrillex, or musicians in general, should be allowed to do this is not what I'm commenting on - but to me it's pretty clear that skrillex copied dienels... and perhaps maddeningly for dienels, did a better job with it.

:shrug:

Post

I miss the old kvr, where we used to argue about loops and presets.

Post

You dont get to say that anymore, 'incubus'. ;)
ImageImageImageImage

Post Reply

Return to “Everything Else (Music related)”