Why, there's people loving every other non-perfect DAW too, it just happens Logic is closest to delivering workflow many people seek in a DAW.jbw wrote:Never understood the love for Logic. Like the rest of Apple's software, it's just not very good.
Logic Pro X v10.2.3 is out
-
- KVRAF
- 3186 posts since 18 Mar, 2008
This entire forum is wading through predictions, opinions, barely formed thoughts, drama, and whining. If you don't enjoy that, why are you here?
ShawnG
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- KVRian
- 501 posts since 14 Aug, 2012
I'm still on 10.9.5, but between updates to Final Cut long ago leaving Mavericks behind, and now this, I think it's time to move on. I'm just waiting for the (likely last El Capitan) 10.11.6 update to come out, and then set aside an afternoon and hope for the best ... 
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- KVRAF
- 1985 posts since 14 Mar, 2006
10.9 is only a couple of years old and by far represents the most stable version of OSX at the moment. Both Yosemite and El Capitan have had significant issues. There are still web pages dedicated to the audio industry stating which audio stuff does not yet work under 10.11. I think its positively outrageous and arrogant for Apple to force 10.11 updates upon users in order to get this "minor" update to LPX. Furthermore its preposterous that Apple continues to force people to upgrade the OS every year just to keep up with the software they use...particularly when these OS upgrades often contain as many new problems as new features. I actually really love using OSX....but Apple is doing everything in its power to ruin my user experience, every year they pull some crap like this.
MacPro 5,1 12core x 3.46ghz-96gb MacOS 12.2 (opencore), X32+AES16e-50
- KVRAF
- 25849 posts since 20 Jan, 2008 from a star near where you are
But it is impossible to install a version of software that is not supported by the OS right?dayjob wrote:shit. was expecting 10.9.5 friendly
how is 10.10 these days? have all the devs caught up by now?
I mean, so that a user will be prompted when starting the installation that their OS must be updated in order to perform the installation?
- KVRAF
- 25849 posts since 20 Jan, 2008 from a star near where you are
Each to his own.jbw wrote:Never understood the love for Logic. Like the rest of Apple's software, it's just not very good.
I would love to be able to run Logic in Windows 10
Seeing what users get for their money, it is difficult to find a DAW more equipped than Logic
-
- KVRAF
- 35671 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
It can't be that bad anyway, if so many, also professional, users swear on it. Nonetheless, lack of backwards compatibility, and such narrow time frames to support a OS version would p*** me off big time. It's the Apple way though. Buy or die.
-
- KVRAF
- 3186 posts since 18 Mar, 2008
Agree absolutely, really like OS X and Logic, but they really ruined both of them enough to kill my desire to keep using them beyond what I have now, didn't lost my mind to pretend it's all dandy, my next DAW will be something Windows based and any new machine too, definitely out of Apple loop for good.Dewdman42 wrote:10.9 is only a couple of years old and by far represents the most stable version of OSX at the moment. Both Yosemite and El Capitan have had significant issues. There are still web pages dedicated to the audio industry stating which audio stuff does not yet work under 10.11. I think its positively outrageous and arrogant for Apple to force 10.11 updates upon users in order to get this "minor" update to LPX. Furthermore its preposterous that Apple continues to force people to upgrade the OS every year just to keep up with the software they use...particularly when these OS upgrades often contain as many new problems as new features. I actually really love using OSX....but Apple is doing everything in its power to ruin my user experience, every year they pull some crap like this.
This entire forum is wading through predictions, opinions, barely formed thoughts, drama, and whining. If you don't enjoy that, why are you here?
ShawnG
-
- KVRAF
- 1985 posts since 14 Mar, 2006
Going apple is kind of an all or nothing proposition. You have to be willing to upgrade your hardware constantly, make sure you have a retina display, thunderbolt and everything else they keep changing...and upgrade the OS every year...like it or not..or else within a year or two you will be unable to upgrade your application software....ESPECIALLY the software made by Apple. Third parties are usually a little better about keeping some backwards compatability. Apple constantly forces everyone, developers and users alike to jump through hoops every year at their whim to adapt to non-backwards-compatible changes they make...some of them innovative and useful...some of them idiotic, but we are forced to accept the bad with the good or get out. Basically you have to be a koolaid drinking Apple fan boy with your wallet out and ready, or else every other year you will get pissed off like I am now.
MacPro 5,1 12core x 3.46ghz-96gb MacOS 12.2 (opencore), X32+AES16e-50
-
- KVRAF
- 2619 posts since 16 Jan, 2013
You might be able to trick installers or apps to run on an earlier OS version, but it depends on what the app requires. Newer OS versions have system libraries and calls that are not in earlier releases. The only way to know is to try it. However in the case of Logic, the App Store won't let you download it if you're not running the required system version.
I was quite happy on 10.6 but it was NI and Ableton that forced my hand by dropping support. So far, 10.10 is doing OK. Hoping 10.12 irons out some of the bugs from 10.11. I wouldn't have a problem with the annual upgrades if they didn't bring the risk of breaking core features, but Apple's QA went out the window long ago. Still, I'll gladly put up with it over trying to deal with a Windows-based DAW system.
I was quite happy on 10.6 but it was NI and Ableton that forced my hand by dropping support. So far, 10.10 is doing OK. Hoping 10.12 irons out some of the bugs from 10.11. I wouldn't have a problem with the annual upgrades if they didn't bring the risk of breaking core features, but Apple's QA went out the window long ago. Still, I'll gladly put up with it over trying to deal with a Windows-based DAW system.
- KVRian
- 1172 posts since 21 Jul, 2012
To me, Mavericks was buggy and Yosemite the most stable. Running on a Mid 2012 Mac Pro. Not touching El Capitan yet. It's always best to stay about a year and a half behind on OS releases. Totally no need to upgrade every year. No one forces you to upgrade every year.Dewdman42 wrote:10.9 is only a couple of years old and by far represents the most stable version of OSX at the moment. Both Yosemite and El Capitan have had significant issues.
- KVRAF
- 37375 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
Yes that's what I do, I upgraded to Yosemite when El Cap came out.LFO8 wrote:To me, Mavericks was buggy and Yosemite the most stable. Running on a Mid 2012 Mac Pro. Not touching El Capitan yet. It's always best to stay about a year and a half behind on OS releases. Totally no need to upgrade every year. No one forces you to upgrade every year.Dewdman42 wrote:10.9 is only a couple of years old and by far represents the most stable version of OSX at the moment. Both Yosemite and El Capitan have had significant issues.
-
- KVRAF
- 1985 posts since 14 Mar, 2006
See I on the other hand think its takes Apple about a year and a half just to work out the bugs in their OS...just when each version is starting to get stable, they release the next unstable version...often times leaving many unfixed problems in the previous version...they will fix some of those problems in the next version, but introduce a bunch of new problems at the same time...
Everyone is chasing their tails trying to keep up with OSX eye candy and icloud crap I could care less about and OSX is almost constantly in a state of instability.
When I get a version of OSX that is running reasonably well, and I've worked through all the myriad of work arounds and hacks to make it work well enough for me and it basically gets my job done...the last thing I want to do is upgrade to the next unstable version of OSX just because Apple wants to force me too. I would gladly stay on Mavericks for another 5 years with no reason to upgrade whatsoever...were it not for Apple trying to force me to go be unstable.
And don't get me started about the lousy system font in 10.10 and 10.11.
Everyone is chasing their tails trying to keep up with OSX eye candy and icloud crap I could care less about and OSX is almost constantly in a state of instability.
When I get a version of OSX that is running reasonably well, and I've worked through all the myriad of work arounds and hacks to make it work well enough for me and it basically gets my job done...the last thing I want to do is upgrade to the next unstable version of OSX just because Apple wants to force me too. I would gladly stay on Mavericks for another 5 years with no reason to upgrade whatsoever...were it not for Apple trying to force me to go be unstable.
And don't get me started about the lousy system font in 10.10 and 10.11.
MacPro 5,1 12core x 3.46ghz-96gb MacOS 12.2 (opencore), X32+AES16e-50
-
Sampleconstruct Sampleconstruct https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=191286
- KVRAF
- 16732 posts since 12 Oct, 2008 from Here and there
I don't get statements like "they ruined Logic enough", it's a very good DAW and I've been making a living using it since the late 1980s, but that's probably just my selective perception.
