Seems to mean that the other 5s of yours (not your three champions) go with 4 points then?IrionDaRonin wrote:In my case, i always vote this way:
1 point for my own track, i never score any other track with just 1 point, only mine, because i think all tracks deserves at least 2 points for the effort, for participating. Even if this wouldn't be in the rules, i still would score myself with just 1 point.
2 points for those tracks that need a bit of improvement in some way, practising will make it, but you came and made your effort.
3 points for those tracks that are interesting, those which are fine, easy to listen, but still lack of something.
4 points for those tracks that are good in many ways, but didn't click on me completely.
5 points for those tracks that come with all the best, in sound design, structure, coolness; but i only choose 3 top tracks with this score, my three champions of the month, these tracks made me feel something inside, those tracks that "clicked" on me.
I prefer to let the whole of voters choose the winners, so I simply rate all tracks from 1 to 5,
but tricky thing is that obviously some tracks are good at first listening where others are better after
two or three listenings. And some tracks that are good at first get less interesting after more listenings.
So there's a lot of chance by how many times the voters have the patience or time to listen more than once,
especially with so many submissions like this OSC 87 month - just some thoughs,<wink>
1 point for the voter track seems to be default, as the website says.
Yes we vote the tracks not for the people.[good wise words here]
But no, giving low scores doesn't mean that people hate you, that's for sure. Hating and scoring are two very different things. And i think we all love and respect each other here. So lets continue this way.
