I was playing with Pulsar Modular P900. And it was a breeez. And it had something all AU synths i have fallen apart. What? The answer is: Awrything in this synth analog modeled. There is nothing digital in it. And sound i am gating is very interesting.
For example with ACE i have. The thing is interesting but it is ruined with digital abulobes (ADSR, Mapping Generation) and lfos and etc. There other synth i like Dcam Synth Squade is ruined by digital mod matrix. And so on.
Yes maybe Mapping Generations and some other things did not existed in analog forum in real world. But it does not mean it is not possible to build them.
So why i am saying this? I am not saying remove digital thing because they might have a use for sautern sound but i am asking Uhe to give an option of full path analog modeled.
P.s.
I need to cheak the new RePro1. If it is full path analog modeled it might be an interesting thing. But meanwhile it would be good if Uhe will make existing synth like ACE for example be possible full path analog modeled.
Full path analog modelled. Feature request for Uhe.
-
- KVRian
- 694 posts since 8 Apr, 2012 from planet Earth
https://слово-божье.рф
-
- KVRAF
- 4141 posts since 11 Aug, 2006 from Texas
A large part of making a synth is the designer's personal tastes and choices for components. Analog modelling doesn't mean "better" and may or may not be the reason why you liked the Pulsar Modular P900. It could just be because your tastes align more with the P900 design than with most u-he ones.
Feel free to call me Brian.
-
- KVRAF
- 13139 posts since 7 May, 2006 from Southern California
C'mon man... does this really sound like a reasonable request to you?
My feature request: Don't implement any of chili7's feature requests.
My feature request: Don't implement any of chili7's feature requests.
-
- KVRAF
- 13139 posts since 7 May, 2006 from Southern California
A little digital in your analog is like peanut butter and chocolate. The perfect combination!
-
david.beholder david.beholder https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=159839 - KVRAF
- 1914 posts since 13 Sep, 2007
Supporting justin3am's request. Could we have free upgrade with it?justin3am wrote:My feature request: Don't implement any of chili7's feature requests.
Last edited by david.beholder on Thu Nov 03, 2016 8:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Murderous duck!
-
- KVRAF
- 4083 posts since 28 Jan, 2011 from MEXICO
Analog hype has created monsters.
dedication to flying
-
david.beholder david.beholder https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=159839
- KVRAF
- 1914 posts since 13 Sep, 2007
rod_zero wrote:Analog hype has created monsters.
Murderous duck!
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 694 posts since 8 Apr, 2012 from planet Earth
The for sure there are things which i like about P900 based on my tastes. For example how musical and gentel and sweet sound the filter and oscillators. While other manufactors go more for agressive ones.bmrzycki wrote:A large part of making a synth is the designer's personal tastes and choices for components. Analog modelling doesn't mean "better" and may or may not be the reason why you liked the Pulsar Modular P900. It could just be because your tastes align more with the P900 design than with most u-he ones.
But speaking about genral things i like in syths i like ful path analog synths .On Youtube you can listen to demos of different full path analog synths and based on that videos they have something magical sound most AU synths lucks.
I think the main reson is modeling is not as accurate. But another reson i think is that path of signal flaw is not fully analog modeled. For example in Ace ADSR, Lfos, Mapping Generator and etc are digital.
Pulsar Modular is more closer to ful path analog synth sound.
The new Uhe Repro might be a intresting thing if it is ful path analog modeled but mono only and no modularity are big bamers for me.
https://слово-божье.рф
-
- KVRAF
- 4083 posts since 28 Jan, 2011 from MEXICO
If you want analog, get analog, stop messing with plug ins , they al suck!
dedication to flying
-
- KVRAF
- 37493 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 694 posts since 8 Apr, 2012 from planet Earth
The porpus of software for people who cannot afford real things or and make things which are very hard or impossible to do in real world.rod_zero wrote:If you want analog, get analog, stop messing with plug ins , they al suck!
For example to make larg format like MU pholyphonic modular would be hard to make in real life. Atomation and saveing patches would be hard to implemtnt on real thing.Maping generators. And so on.
I am not saying it is not possible to do in real life but unfortionaly no one done that or at list i do not know who did that.
https://слово-божье.рф
-
- KVRian
- 1440 posts since 14 Apr, 2008 from velvet noise
+1david.beholder wrote:Supporting justin3am's request. Could we have free upgrade with it?justin3am wrote:My feature request: Don't implement any of chili7's feature requests.
BTW: Chilly7 comments are always fun to read till the moment I remember he seems to meant to be
serious
AND PLEASE TO ALL OF YOU, STOP THE ATOMATION OF PATCHES It refuses description, allowing only the vague approach of adjectives: dark, light, raw, angelic. Who or what is making these noises? Where are they coming from and what do they point to? What kind of entity can leave such a troubling sonic remnant?