[Repro-1] Public Beta

Official support for: u-he.com
Locked New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

Urs wrote:Well, all other monosynths I'd like my devs to tackle are considerably easier to model than the Pro-One. The Cat is probably the next difficult one, with the Prodigy and the Wasp at the bottom of the scale and the OB-1 and the Korg 700 series somewhere in the middle. Those are the ones on my radar and of which I have at least one specimen. I'd expect each to be done in less than half a year. Oh yes, the Polivoks is yet another candidate, but it's utterly difficult.

I won't take wishes/suggestions btw. as these are going to be projects taken by the devs preference and based on what we got. I won't buy more synths unless I can sell some off - which I can only after they're modelled!

However, there are loads of other things on our plate, but whenever a developer/intern/student sits idle for a week, he can work on a module of any of these synths. I hope we can do some of them over time.

Myself, I'm gonna work on other things. I'll just throw the filters at them and maybe an effect or two 8)
:dog: Urs gives away his master plan. Yeah keep them all out of your hair while you work on Zebra! Throwing them filters sounds like you're feeding animals at your private zoo. That works for me. Whatever it takes. :hihi: Just make sure they get the Korg 700 series right. :tu:
:hyper: M O N O S Y N T H S F O R E V E R :hyper:

Post

Urs wrote:
OMG OMG OMG OMG CAAAAAT!!!!! ω(=^.^=)ω
Well, all other monosynths I'd like my devs to tackle are considerably easier to model than the Pro-One. The Cat is probably the next difficult one, with the Prodigy and the Wasp at the bottom of the scale and the OB-1 and the Korg 700 series somewhere in the middle. Those are the ones on my radar and of which I have at least one specimen. I'd expect each to be done in less than half a year. Oh yes, the Polivoks is yet another candidate, but it's utterly difficult.
IMO Polivox totally worth it. Also strange that you have no diode ladder filter in plans.
Murderous duck!

Post

david.beholder wrote:Also strange that you have no diode ladder filter in plans.
For Diva maybe...

(also, the old Korg ones are diode filters... just different topology as EMS or Roland)

Post

Urs wrote:
david.beholder wrote:Also strange that you have no diode ladder filter in plans.
For Diva maybe...

(also, the old Korg ones are diode filters... just different topology as EMS or Roland)
Well you've made me open TS201012 schematics and basically stare at diode ring without any clue what's going on for couple minutes. :)
Murderous duck!

Post

ghettosynth wrote:I like the sequencer. I would love to be able to "tweak" sequencer two to be an accent sequencer. Nothing fancy, just an option for 1+2. So, you have a jumper that changes 1+2 to work as two parallel sequencers and then velocity is an offset for VCA EG modulation and pitch (with or without glide, whatever's easiest) is an offset for VCF EG modulation.

That would make this a badass acid machine.

Ok, I didn't really play with the mod matrix before I wrote this, I should have. Simplified, I'd like to have velocity and pitch (again with or without glide) as modulation sources from either both sequencers or just sequencer 2 and then the 1+2 tweak would just be serial/parallel.

Is this interesting to other people, or just me?

Post

david.beholder wrote: IMO Polivox totally worth it. Also strange that you have no diode ladder filter in plans.
The only real analog hardware synth with a diode ladder filter i owned so far is the Novation Bass Station II that i bought this year and that filter is indeed really nice and interesting. That Acid filter is really different to the Classic LPF included with the BS II.
Ingo Weidner
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1

Post

Repro-1 sounds great. The oscillators can sound huge and are very versatile! Nice filter. Awesome effects (wavefolder!). Easy to program (I already made 30 presets just for fun).

Some more modulation options and polyphony would be welcome.

How long will the introduction price last?

Post

kiezum wrote:...polyphony would be welcome.
It won't happen.
kiezum wrote:How long will the introduction price last?
Till release.

Post

kiezum wrote:
Some more modulation options and polyphony would be welcome.
Indeed, but u-he dont do requests
kiezum wrote:
How long will the introduction price last?
Till the end of november when the final version is released (its currently a public beta)

Post

I hope this is the place for bugs. I've noticed that Logic Pro X has an increased CPU usage after closing a document containing RePro-1. Repro (haha) is simple: start Logic, create new document, add single track, set instrument to RePro-1, play a note, close document, observe CPU usage.

I've also heard some rumbling noises, but not quite clicks while using RePro-1.

Post

AnX wrote:
kiezum wrote:
Some more modulation options and polyphony would be welcome.
Indeed, but u-he dont do requests
Oh, but we do - just not right now.

Post

Urs wrote:Well, all other monosynths I'd like my devs to tackle are considerably easier to model than the Pro-One. The Cat is probably the next difficult one, with the Prodigy and the Wasp at the bottom of the scale and the OB-1 and the Korg 700 series somewhere in the middle. Those are the ones on my radar and of which I have at least one specimen. I'd expect each to be done in less than half a year. Oh yes, the Polivoks is yet another candidate, but it's utterly difficult.

I won't take wishes/suggestions btw. as these are going to be projects taken by the devs preference and based on what we got. I won't buy more synths unless I can sell some off - which I can only after they're modelled!

However, there are loads of other things on our plate, but whenever a developer/intern/student sits idle for a week, he can work on a module of any of these synths. I hope we can do some of them over time.

Myself, I'm gonna work on other things. I'll just throw the filters at them and maybe an effect or two 8)
So, now, 1 to 1 emulations will be a thing on u-He?

Let me see if I picked it right: Urs will work on Zebra, and the rest of the crew will have some freedom to work on their favorite emulations on their spare time? Like the side projects from developers at google?

Post

FLWrd wrote:I hope this is the place for bugs. I've noticed that Logic Pro X has an increased CPU usage after closing a document containing RePro-1. Repro (haha) is simple: start Logic, create new document, add single track, set instrument to RePro-1, play a note, close document, observe CPU usage.

I've also heard some rumbling noises, but not quite clicks while using RePro-1.
hehe, sounds odd - how do you observe CPU usage? Make a new project in Logic or look at Activity Monitor?

Post

waltercruz wrote:So, now, 1 to 1 emulations will be a thing on u-He?

Let me see if I picked it right: Urs will work on Zebra, and the rest of the crew will have some freedom to work on their favorite emulations on their spare time? Like the side projects from developers at google?
Yeah, I guess...?

In think it makes perfect sense. The big selling point of u-he is sound quality and - since Diva - analogue tone. The big drawback of u-he is software complexity. So why not do a few products that take advantage of the one thing while avoiding the other? Or maybe use some as extensions to Diva?

Making Repro was fun. Sounds like a good plan to me doing more of this.

Also, can't wait to sell my Oberheims off and get some Arps in.

Post

Urs wrote:Also, can't wait to sell my Oberheims off and get some Arps in.
An actively developed 2600? Or dare I hope a 64-bit cross-platform (for those who need it) Pro-Soloist? A... Quadra? :O

Locked

Return to “u-he”