u-he

Urs · Post by **Urs** » Wed Nov 16, 2016 7:01 pm

Also, we might have a new beta/release candidate next week with a few hundred presets.

tasmaniandevil · Post by **tasmaniandevil** » Wed Nov 16, 2016 10:17 pm

Aerithos wrote:This patch is relatively simple, and playing it normally provides no issue. However, when pressing play in FL Studio on either the playlist or the pattern, the patch is silent for a second, then the volume comes back in like the release of a limiter.

Thank you very much for the detailed information and the example files.
I can reproduce it in different hosts, too.
Seems to be something going on with Jaws when starting host playback.
Adding it to our bug-tracking list now.

aaron aardvark · Post by **aaron aardvark** » Thu Nov 17, 2016 5:13 am

Urs wrote:Also, we might have a new beta/release candidate next week with a few hundred presets.

Sounds tasty!

Edit: Will the next beta consume less CPU?

spunkmuffin · Post by **spunkmuffin** » Thu Nov 17, 2016 6:46 am

aaron aardvark wrote:Sounds tasty!

How can something sound tasty?

Stefken · Post by **Stefken** » Thu Nov 17, 2016 7:10 am

Urs wrote:Also, we might have a new beta/release candidate next week with a few hundred presets.

Nice! Development seems to be going well. Huge Cpu savings, presets coming in, not too many bug reports.

Any decision yet whether we will be able to use repro as an effect (Fx version)?

Urs · Post by **Urs** » Thu Nov 17, 2016 9:57 am

If we do an FX version it won't be before next year. There was so much feedback, I hardly got to put much thought into this, I had to concentrate on CPU savings.

CPU savings will be around 35% on average, and up to 60% or so on expensive patches. With the "CPU saver" mode it'll be another 40% off, and most patches will sound just fine in that mode.

The next beta will have these improvements, but we might continue this work later on.

H2its · Post by **H2its** » Thu Nov 17, 2016 11:07 am

Wow, i have tried it and just Wow.

It sounds so real, so in "your face" that it is just a great pleasure. It is the first time i buy a synth software ( first time i have money for that :p ), and put that money in a great compagny like U-he is so cool !

I already tried Diva, and i find that repro-1is one step above, it sounds so much warm and authentic ( Althought Diva is already amazing ). Will you use all the new Things you learn in Repro-1 dev to improve Diva modules to sound as warm as repro is ?

I have just one idea to make it more than already perfect : Hardware synth are great because there are small hum and noise in the backround that feel the air of the mix. As you did it in satin, is it technically possible to modelise such type of noise due to components themself ?

keep it up ! you're amazing !

Ahmonster · Post by **Ahmonster** » Thu Nov 17, 2016 11:18 am

I love the sound.. but man it's a major CPU hog, what can be done to bring that down?
I'm running it on Windows 10 16Gb Ram 1Tb memory @ 7200
and if there is a way to get it down, how much of the sound quality will be lost..
I do love the way it looks and sounds..
If the CPU doesn't bite me, today when I get home I want to see if I can get some presets made. I'm about to finish a set for another software. again love the sound, that's why I would like to get some presets done..

Urs · Post by **Urs** » Thu Nov 17, 2016 11:21 am

Ahmonster wrote:and if there is a way to get it down, how much of the sound quality will be lost..

next beta, in about a week we hope:

Urs wrote:CPU savings will be around 35% on average, and up to 60% or so on expensive patches. With the "CPU saver" mode it'll be another 40% off, and most patches will sound just fine in that mode.

Urs · Post by **Urs** » Thu Nov 17, 2016 11:35 am

H2its wrote:I have just one idea to make it more than already perfect : Hardware synth are great because there are small hum and noise in the backround that feel the air of the mix. As you did it in satin, is it technically possible to modelise such type of noise due to components themself ?

We have left out the 50/60Hz humm from the rectifier/power adapter, which is very prominent in early Pro-Ones that did not get the power adapter moved from the main board to the back panel. It's kind of noisy and boring.

Nevertheless, we've measured the noise level/spectrum at a dozen or so junctions on the circuit board, wherever it has an effect on the sound, either by injecting itself into the audio path or by adding to control signals. So we added a few sources of red and white noise, filtered them accordingly and hooked them into these places.

Gucky · Post by **Gucky** » Thu Nov 17, 2016 1:36 pm

Hi Urs,
some days ago I read an article about the Oberheim OB1 synth.
It looks beautiful and it sounds beautiful.
It would be a good a good counterpart to your Repro-1.
Maybe a candidate for a new Repro-X in the future?
Here is the article with some sound examples:
https://www.amazona.de/blue-box-oberheim-ob1/

Urs · Post by **Urs** » Thu Nov 17, 2016 1:38 pm

Gucky wrote:Maybe a candidate for a new Repro-X in the future?

There's one on my keyboard stand and on my wish list for an emulation

Gucky · Post by **Gucky** » Thu Nov 17, 2016 1:44 pm

Hi Urs,
wow, that are great news!
Hoping for the Repro of OB1 in the next years!

Meanwhile I have much fun with programming presets for Repro-1.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/453 ... sounds.zip
If you like it you can take it for the factory library.

drzhnn · Post by **drzhnn** » Thu Nov 17, 2016 1:48 pm

beely wrote:So who's gonna be the first to do a YouTube demo of the Stranger Things theme using just the Repro-1, then, eh...

Here's my humble attempt

13 instances of RePro-1 with no additional effects.

https://soundcloud.com/drzhnn/stranger- ... pro-1-edit

soundgeek · Post by **soundgeek** » Thu Nov 17, 2016 2:36 pm

Nice track !

u-he

KVR Audio

[Repro-1] Public Beta