Again making requests to MPS.

[Lejurai]

Well.. One request actually. And nothing new really

I was asking earlier that could it be possible to make osc 2 n 3 to have unison too. The answer was "NO!!!! "

Well I have something else in my mind

Per oscillator fx slot

If the sound goes now osc -> filter -> fx matrix -> out.. It could go osc -> fx slot (that is located in each osc page) -> filter -> fx matrix -> out

Then I wouldn't have to request unison to oscs since I could add MUnison after osc 2 and 3 (or some other effects if I want. Would be useful too if I want to tighten sub sound but nothing else, that I could toss a comp after (for example) osc 3 if sub layer hides in there

[MeldaProduction]

Bad news I'm afraid - no to all of them. They basically do the same thing and I understand why you want that, I actually think it could be useful. But the first cases are very complex, I cannot give that development time. And the last one is impossible, because Filters are pervoice, while FX is for the final output, so it obviously cannot be exchanged. I'm afraid you'll have to wait for MYYY. Which may happen never , depending on the neverending feature requests .

[Lejurai]

Bad news I'm afraid - no to all of them. They basically do the same thing and I understand why you want that, I actually think it could be useful. But the first cases are very complex, I cannot give that development time.

Ok.. That did. People please stop making requests that we can get this

And the last one is impossible, because Filters are pervoice, while FX is for the final output, so it obviously cannot be exchanged.

Hmmm.. How about optional routing/splitting to signal? Default would be how it is now, and another option would be to split the signal from oscs to filter 1 or 2, then there would be 2 inputs in mod matrix. Input 1 for filter 1 and input 2 for filter 2. Then I could selectively add fx that I want, where I want. For example osc 1 to filter 1 going through input 1 and osc 2 & 3 to filter 2 and munison added in fx matrix to input 2?

I'm afraid you'll have to wait for MYYY. Which may happen never , depending on the neverending feature requests .

MYYY?

[MeldaProduction]

I already tried to think about the spliting some time ago. Certainly everything is possible, but sadly it is way too complex due to the current design anyway.
MYYY should be like MXXX, but a synth .

[Lejurai]

I already tried to think about the spliting some time ago. Certainly everything is possible, but sadly it is way too complex due to the current design anyway.

I'll figure out something someday!

MYYY should be like MXXX, but a synth .

Hmm.. So there would be a matrix where one could add different kind of oscillators, filters, modulators.. Sounds like a must/instabuy

[Chandlerhimself]

There is a work around to what you're trying to do. Set the OSC how ever you want it. Turn off all the filters. Add the fx you want(unison) then add a filter to the fx section. I used to think MPowersynth was limited by how it was set up, but it really isn't. Remember that it isn't like a normal synth. It doesn't just have 3 OSC and 2 filters. You can add instances of MPowersynth to the fx section, so there are all sorts of weird, strange and unique things you can do.

It took me a while to realize this, but once you do a world of new possibilities opens up.

[Lejurai]

I'm aware of possibility to put mps in my mps that I can play mps while I'm playing with my mps. But it's a bit frustrating to make a preset, then open new mps in fx, open the preset, then gather needed parameters under one knob (like cutoff) etc.

But that first thing you mentioned.. Thanks

[MeldaProduction]

It may be complex indeed, however note that you can show the additional subinstances as popups, so if you have a reasonable screen estate, you are good to go .