Hey all! I, like may of us use the Universal Audio Apollo interface. Wouldn't it be incredible if Blue Cat would/Could develop a version that would run on Sharcs for that platform???
UA may never go for it but I think it would be incredible! The Apollo's latency with plugins is sub 2ms
Even if the Patchwork added another ms or 2 I think people would go crazy for it!
What do you think?
Patchworks for UAD Apollo platform!
-
- KVRAF
- 10136 posts since 16 Dec, 2002
I don't think uad would licence that technology ever
-
Blue Cat Audio Blue Cat Audio https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=39981 - KVRAF
- 6350 posts since 8 Sep, 2004 from Paris (France)
Some things would be technically feasible, but definitely not for a third party company like us!
-
- KVRist
- 126 posts since 17 Jul, 2003
can you tell us why ?
Intel Ultra9 285K / 96 Go DDR5 / 2x SSD M2 / Win 11 Pro x64 / UAD Apollo Twin USB / UAD2 Satellite Octo / UAD2 Octo PCIe / Cubase Pro 15 / Luna Pro / VEP 8 / Komplete Kontrol S61 / Roli M / Console 1 MKIII System / iPad Metagrid-Lemur /
-
- KVRAF
- 10136 posts since 16 Dec, 2002
The vst plugins would need to be reverse engineered which goes against every licence or they would need to make the source available.
Also a code interpreter would need to convert the x86 / x64 to Sharc
Just for starters
Also a code interpreter would need to convert the x86 / x64 to Sharc
Just for starters
-
Blue Cat Audio Blue Cat Audio https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=39981
- KVRAF
- 6350 posts since 8 Sep, 2004 from Paris (France)
Even for hosting plug-ins that are already UAD-compatible, it would require very specific programming that can only be done by UAD.