Improvements!

[zvenx]

Damn Urs, I was going to try to have him 'email' me the $20

Yes Urs is of course right, I was just messing with you..
Its always been there iirc.

rsp

[waltercruz]

please add a configuration to make multicore default on ace!

[nilhartman]

A Bazille FR/suggestion: the ability to predefine the color of the wire(s) depending on the (input and/or) output. For exemple, out of the oscillators: green wires, out of the filters: blue, out of the enveloppes: red, out of the multiplex(es): yellow etc...

[mcbpete]

A Bazille FR/suggestion: the ability to predefine the color of the wire(s) depending on the (input and/or) output. For exemple, out of the oscillators: green wires, out of the filters: blue, out of the enveloppes: red, out of the multiplex(es): yellow etc...

I still can't get a combination of colours, opacity and thickness that I'm entirely happy with when doing more complex patches: Too thick and opaque it covers the parameters, values and some of the i/o ports, to thin and transparent and I lose track of where things are being routed too and from. Can't quite seem to get a good balance !

I think that colour for what type of module it's come from is a great idea - It's how I have my copy of Buzz set up: Blue cables come from native generators, silver from VSTs, pink out of effects and shades of rainbow colours from multi-out devices -

[nilhartman]

FWIW, I'm currently using solid/hair, with the gearporn GUI at 130%:

[mcbpete]

I guess it's just really the nature of a modular system like that that the obfuscation arises but again even in that example it's not immediately obvious to discern where things are going from and to without without carefully tracing the cable. Maybe some sort of highlighting feature - You hover the mouse over a cable and it lights up in some way along with the input and output terminals the cable is connected to.

[mrj1nx]

Hey there, some bazille thoughts: is it theoretically possible to construct a comb filter in Bazille? I was theory crafting about using the sample and hold and triggering it with another oscillator that is offset in phase to introduce a slight delay, But I guess that would essentially only mean 2 samples per cycle, and not actually sound like a delay at all? I was thinking that it might be a really neat thing to have access to a delay path in Bazille, one possibility would be to introduce a selector for some of the side modules, like the lag generator, to allow that section to have multiple selectable functions. I was also thinking about a path into and back from the effect units could have been really interesting.

[sonicsabotage]

My proposals:

1.Diva: audio in, would be a very cool feature to use the filter on other sorces, also consistent to some moog synths...

2.Diva and Bazille: stacking voices with lower detune amount: current minimum is 0.20 if I remember correctly and sometimes I feel it is already too much. If not too much cpu intensive, maybe let the pitch of different stacked voices be modulated by one LFO.

3.Bazille (and Diva possibly): please let us modulate one single parameter of the envelope (like hive: lp filter decay for example).

4.Diva: please insert one faster/snappier envelope (ok, I know it is possible with recursive mod, but still...)

5.Diva: A 18 DB diode filter (acid Diva) would be asking too much?

6.Diva: hive soft clip distortion, maybe?

[Howard]

2.Diva and Bazille: stacking voices with lower detune amount: current minimum is 0.20 if I remember correctly and sometimes I feel it is already too much. If not too much cpu intensive, maybe let the pitch of different stacked voices be modulated by one LFO.

Minimum is 0.01 - you just need to hold SHIFT before and during editing (see user guides).

[sonicsabotage]

Minimum is 0.01 - you just need to hold SHIFT before and during editing (see user guides).

Quite embrassing that I did not find it . Thank you very much Howard for the tip.

[mrj1nx]

Hello there,

I would like to suggest an improvement for Presswerk, a view where you see a rolling graph with the audio material and a line representing the gain reduction happening, similar to the view that is available in izotope and fabfilter plugins (theres also a similar view in logic pro x compressor). Ideally you would still have access to the controls while viewing this graph.

One way to do it would be to have it in the middle area where the gain reduction needles are. If you click on it it could toggle to the rolling graph view. The bigger the better I would say, the one in apples compressor is quite small.

Example in FabFilter Pro C2 https://www.fabfilter.com/products/pro- ... or-plug-in

Another minor improvement would be to have the actual numbers for things like ratio attack etc visible close to the knobs. I like the clean look of the interface as it is, but it would be nice to get a quicker grasp of the settings. Could be an optional setting to have the numbers show up.

[zerocrossing]

I guess it's just really the nature of a modular system like that that the obfuscation arises but again even in that example it's not immediately obvious to discern where things are going from and to without without carefully tracing the cable. Maybe some sort of highlighting feature - You hover the mouse over a cable and it lights up in some way along with the input and output terminals the cable is connected to.

Right, it's not like this issue hasn't been transferred from the real world. I'm not sure why everyone is so keen on taking that part of modular and replicating it virtually. Look at the ol' VAZ Modular. All the flexibility, none of the clutter. What's wrong with how Omnisphere does it? Right click-assign. BOOM. What's going on? Open mod-matrix page. Also, maybe highlight knobs that are being modulated like Alchemy.

I know everyone will hate my idea, but when I'm king, I shall make a declaration for it to be so, and everyone will love me... until my enemies poison me.

[pdxindy]

Right, it's not like this issue hasn't been transferred from the real world. I'm not sure why everyone is so keen on taking that part of modular and replicating it virtually. Look at the ol' VAZ Modular. All the flexibility, none of the clutter. What's wrong with how Omnisphere does it? Right click-assign. BOOM.

Synths like Omnisphere and Zebra tend to have more high level modulation modules. In Bazille I am often making strings of modulation (for example: LFO -> Rectifier -> Lag Generator). It is easier to follow such strings with cables than trace in Mod Matrixes.

[Howard]

Synths like Omnisphere and Zebra tend to have more high level modulation modules. In Bazille I am often making strings of modulation (for example: LFO -> Rectifier -> Lag Generator). It is easier to follow such strings with cables than trace in Mod Matrixes.

Very good point I hadn't considered. Maybe include such "strings" in the list of modulation assignments.

[pdxindy]

Synths like Omnisphere and Zebra tend to have more high level modulation modules. In Bazille I am often making strings of modulation (for example: LFO -> Rectifier -> Lag Generator). It is easier to follow such strings with cables than trace in Mod Matrixes.

Very good point I hadn't considered. Maybe include such "strings" in the list of modulation assignments.

Interesting to consider. One might end up with a helluva lot of modulation targets to account for 'string' variations.

Also, in Bazille as is, I can have that string of LFO -> Rectifier -> Lag Generator and the Lag can go out to 5-7 different targets, it is easy to add another module in the middle of the chain without having to touch the 5-7 targets. With a mod matrix you would have to change 5-7 individual assignments. Also, since all cables can be moved at once, I can move the 5-7 outputs from the Lag to a multiple if I decide to do something further with it.

It may look messy, but it is quite capable. I think it would be fun/challenging to conceptualize a different approach.