Thanks jmg8! I can hardly wait!!jmg8 wrote:I have a video I can share with you that I made. It shows the best way to do it (in my opinion)
Link to follow shortly when I get home.
Revolutionising mixing: Izotope goes first, but MeldaProduction later and better?
-
- KVRist
- 354 posts since 27 Jan, 2015
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 509 posts since 28 Oct, 2012 from Argentina
jmg8: nice video, thanks. I notice you did not limit the analysis to the lower end of the spectrum, and still MADEQ only provided adjustments for that area. How come it ignored the differences at higher frequencies?
-
- KVRAF
- 2702 posts since 9 Jul, 2015 from UK
I don't know to be honestpumafred wrote:jmg8: nice video, thanks. I notice you did not limit the analysis to the lower end of the spectrum, and still MADEQ only provided adjustments for that area. How come it ignored the differences at higher frequencies?
Jason @ Melda Production
-
- KVRist
- 354 posts since 27 Jan, 2015
Just guessing, maybe because all 6 bands were being used to duck the lower frequencies, none left over to be used in the higher ones?pumafred wrote:jmg8: nice video, thanks. I notice you did not limit the analysis to the lower end of the spectrum, and still MADEQ only provided adjustments for that area. How come it ignored the differences at higher frequencies?
-
- KVRist
- 354 posts since 27 Jan, 2015
A thing of beauty! I hope you don't mind, I have posted this on other forums (attributed to you of course!).jmg8 wrote:
I have used a preset in MADEQ where the dynamic nodes chased harmonics across the screen as they varied over time. I wonder if somehow that can be modified to a situation where the ducking EQ nodes would change over time as two varying signals do.
I guess not, as the blue curve and red curve are static, not dynamic ...
So - thanks for showing the "Best of Melda doing Neutron", jmg8!!
-
- KVRAF
- 2702 posts since 9 Jul, 2015 from UK
Well, MSpectralDynamics is probably the way to go for this. It does exactly what you just asked. By that I mean it is not static and constantly changes its shape as its inputs do. MSD is my favourite way to do it, but you asked specifically for MADEQ.
Have you tried playing around with the pitch modulator? you can use this to make the nodes follow the pitch as it changes, this can be a good way to make the ducking more accurate.
Also, since making that video and showing it to Vojtech, he added a new button! Its called "swap dynamics and gain" it basically means that you don't have to copy all the values across as I did in the video.
Have you tried playing around with the pitch modulator? you can use this to make the nodes follow the pitch as it changes, this can be a good way to make the ducking more accurate.
Also, since making that video and showing it to Vojtech, he added a new button! Its called "swap dynamics and gain" it basically means that you don't have to copy all the values across as I did in the video.
Jason @ Melda Production
-
- KVRist
- 354 posts since 27 Jan, 2015
Hi jmg8 - if you get a moment (busy holiday season, on top of everything else!), would you mind giving a description of view you are using MSpectralDynamics to do that please?jmg8 wrote:Well, MSpectralDynamics is probably the way to go for this. It does exactly what you just asked. By that I mean it is not static and constantly changes its shape as its inputs do. MSD is my favourite way to do it, but you asked specifically for MADEQ.
Have you tried playing around with the pitch modulator? you can use this to make the nodes follow the pitch as it changes, this can be a good way to make the ducking more accurate.
Also, since making that video and showing it to Vojtech, he added a new button! Its called "swap dynamics and gain" it basically means that you don't have to copy all the values across as I did in the video.
Thanks in advance!