KVR Audio

ghettosynth · Post by **ghettosynth** » Sat Dec 31, 2016 1:48 am

chk071 wrote:
ghettosynth wrote: You're comparing apples to apples.
Well, all is fine then, isn't it?

Not when you want to compare it to oranges, i.e., "most other plugins."

chk071 · Post by **chk071** » Sat Dec 31, 2016 1:50 am

Oh... i get you now.

Apratim · Post by **Apratim** » Sat Dec 31, 2016 8:02 am

was running 28 instances of Mpowersynth with a square wave(shape was different in different instances) + 10 voices(max for all) + 34.8% detune(varying in different instances) + dynamic eq(in m powersynth) +Reverb (1.2-3 sec)+Arpege(was off or on for some instances) + a complex midi file
Cpu usage
36%

load distribution across all cores on single slave was equal
sound quality in vst was set to ultra

Massive users Need your Opinion on how good is Massive regarding cpu usage

Paree · Post by **Paree** » Sat Dec 31, 2016 8:14 am

Apratim wrote:was running 28 instances of Mpowersynth with a square wave(shape was different in different instances) + 10 voices(max for all) + 34.8% detune(varying in different instances) + dynamic eq(in m powersynth) +Reverb (1.2-3 sec)+Arpege(was off or on for some instances) + a complex midi file
Cpu usage
36%

load distribution across all cores on single slave was equal
sound quality in vst was set to ultra

Massive users Need your Opinion on how good is Massive regarding cpu usage

I'm not a massive user but what's your CPU Config?

Apratim · Post by **Apratim** » Sat Dec 31, 2016 8:17 am

Paree wrote:
Apratim wrote:was running 28 instances of Mpowersynth with a square wave(shape was different in different instances) + 10 voices(max for all) + 34.8% detune(varying in different instances) + dynamic eq(in m powersynth) +Reverb (1.2-3 sec)+Arpege(was off or on for some instances) + a complex midi file
Cpu usage
36%

load distribution across all cores on single slave was equal
sound quality in vst was set to ultra

Massive users Need your Opinion on how good is Massive regarding cpu usage
I'm not a massive user but what's your CPU Config?

for my laptop its a quad core a10 9600p 3.3GHz
and for my all slaves its 4.6Ghz(overclocked)FX 8370E 8core

EnGee · Post by **EnGee** » Sat Dec 31, 2016 8:59 am

Apratim wrote:was running 28 instances of Mpowersynth with a square wave(shape was different in different instances) + 10 voices(max for all) + 34.8% detune(varying in different instances) + dynamic eq(in m powersynth) +Reverb (1.2-3 sec)+Arpege(was off or on for some instances) + a complex midi file
Cpu usage
36%

load distribution across all cores on single slave was equal
sound quality in vst was set to ultra

Massive users Need your Opinion on how good is Massive regarding cpu usage

I consider Massive to be a low CPU synth. I believe it uses less cpu than Mpowersynth (with similar preset config).

I could play 16 instances of Massive loading the first preset (1991) and when all armed playing with my keyboard, it shows about 41% cpu in my Studio One v3 (44.1 khz with 128 buffer using iTwo Asio driver). I consider this a very good result on my i5-4570 cpu with balanced power options

Apratim · Post by **Apratim** » Sat Dec 31, 2016 9:16 am

EnGee wrote:
Apratim wrote:was running 28 instances of Mpowersynth with a square wave(shape was different in different instances) + 10 voices(max for all) + 34.8% detune(varying in different instances) + dynamic eq(in m powersynth) +Reverb (1.2-3 sec)+Arpege(was off or on for some instances) + a complex midi file
Cpu usage
36%

load distribution across all cores on single slave was equal
sound quality in vst was set to ultra

Massive users Need your Opinion on how good is Massive regarding cpu usage
I consider Massive to be a low CPU synth. I believe it uses less cpu than Mpowersynth (with similar preset config).

I could play 16 instances of Massive loading the first preset (1991) and when all armed playing with my keyboard, it shows about 41% cpu in my Studio One v3 (44.1 khz with 128 buffer using iTwo Asio driver). I consider this a very good result on my i5-4570 cpu with balanced power options

that seems pretty but i cant buy that now now.i only have to buy now some mastering/mixing/effect plugins any way thanks for the reply

EnGee · Post by **EnGee** » Sat Dec 31, 2016 9:37 am

Apratim wrote:
EnGee wrote:
Apratim wrote:was running 28 instances of Mpowersynth with a square wave(shape was different in different instances) + 10 voices(max for all) + 34.8% detune(varying in different instances) + dynamic eq(in m powersynth) +Reverb (1.2-3 sec)+Arpege(was off or on for some instances) + a complex midi file
Cpu usage
36%

load distribution across all cores on single slave was equal
sound quality in vst was set to ultra

Massive users Need your Opinion on how good is Massive regarding cpu usage
I consider Massive to be a low CPU synth. I believe it uses less cpu than Mpowersynth (with similar preset config).

I could play 16 instances of Massive loading the first preset (1991) and when all armed playing with my keyboard, it shows about 41% cpu in my Studio One v3 (44.1 khz with 128 buffer using iTwo Asio driver). I consider this a very good result on my i5-4570 cpu with balanced power options
that seems pretty but i cant buy that now now.i only have to buy now some mastering/mixing/effect plugins any way thanks for the reply

You don't have to buy it now, especially you already have a powerful synth. If you use Reaper, then you have also a very good collection of effects.

When you are ready for the next purchase, check the 2nd hand market here in KVR. You can find Massive for half the price or little bit less sometimes. Anyway, when you know your Mpowersynth well, you would know also which other synth you need

Buying your tools step by step, IMO, is better than buying everything in one go.

Apratim · Post by **Apratim** » Sat Dec 31, 2016 10:45 am

EnGee wrote:
Apratim wrote:
EnGee wrote:
Apratim wrote:was running 28 instances of Mpowersynth with a square wave(shape was different in different instances) + 10 voices(max for all) + 34.8% detune(varying in different instances) + dynamic eq(in m powersynth) +Reverb (1.2-3 sec)+Arpege(was off or on for some instances) + a complex midi file
Cpu usage
36%

load distribution across all cores on single slave was equal
sound quality in vst was set to ultra

Massive users Need your Opinion on how good is Massive regarding cpu usage
I consider Massive to be a low CPU synth. I believe it uses less cpu than Mpowersynth (with similar preset config).

I could play 16 instances of Massive loading the first preset (1991) and when all armed playing with my keyboard, it shows about 41% cpu in my Studio One v3 (44.1 khz with 128 buffer using iTwo Asio driver). I consider this a very good result on my i5-4570 cpu with balanced power options
that seems pretty but i cant buy that now now.i only have to buy now some mastering/mixing/effect plugins any way thanks for the reply
You don't have to buy it now, especially you already have a powerful synth. If you use Reaper, then you have also a very good collection of effects.

When you are ready for the next purchase, check the 2nd hand market here in KVR. You can find Massive for half the price or little bit less sometimes. Anyway, when you know your Mpowersynth well, you would know also which other synth you need Buying your tools step by step, IMO, is better than buying everything in one go.

Actually Mpowersynth I not that hard to Learn man its like expanded version of my friends sylenth1 some times i feeling that why would any one need 3 big ass oscillators with 2 insane filters and 8 flexible as rubber like Lfos

.jon · Post by **.jon** » Sat Dec 31, 2016 10:55 am

EnGee wrote: If you use Reaper, then you have also a very good collection of effects.

wtf? Reaper has by far the worst effects of all daws. Most of them are unacceptably bad and will literally ruin your track. Please stop giving bad advice to people if you don't have a clue.

EnGee · Post by **EnGee** » Sat Dec 31, 2016 11:05 am

.jon wrote:
EnGee wrote: If you use Reaper, then you have also a very good collection of effects.
wtf? Reaper has by far the worst effects of all daws. Most of them are unacceptably bad and will literally ruin your track. Please stop giving bad advice to people if you don't have a clue.

Do you mean they are buggy? What do you mean by "worst" effects of all daws?

egbert101 · Post by **egbert101** » Sat Dec 31, 2016 11:11 am

.jon · Post by **.jon** » Sat Dec 31, 2016 11:16 am

EnGee wrote: Do you mean they are buggy? What do you mean by "worst" effects of all daws?

They sound like shit except for the compressor, and all have the usability of a drunken moose. Some of them are also buggy, but that's a given, it's Reaper after all.

.jon · Post by **.jon** » Sat Dec 31, 2016 11:17 am

egbert101 wrote:LOL there is nothing wrong with Reaper's plugins.

LOL yes there is, but apparently also something wrong with your ears.

EnGee · Post by **EnGee** » Sat Dec 31, 2016 11:22 am

.jon wrote:
EnGee wrote: Do you mean they are buggy? What do you mean by "worst" effects of all daws?
They sound like shit except for the compressor, and all have the usability of a drunken moose. Some of them are also buggy, but that's a given, it's Reaper after all.

Sound like shit?! Why would the compressor be an exception then?!

Man, you are the one who doesn't have a clue it seems! Reaper is fine, and for the price it is unbeatable. It doesn't ruin your tracks at all!

Need opinion for new PLugins