Synthmaster for $10
- KVRAF
- 16136 posts since 13 Nov, 2012
Super deal, I would buy it if I dint already own it... 
-
- KVRAF
- 35671 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Not at all.egbert101 wrote:People complaining about $10 for SynthMaster?
- KVRAF
- 22862 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
Their aim is to get you to buy the expansions, which are very good. Even I got them when I bought Synthmaster a few years back.chk071 wrote:Not at all.egbert101 wrote:People complaining about $10 for SynthMaster?It's great that they make it available for so many people. Even though it pretty much devalues the software, with so many sales, and now, this no-brainer sale. But that shouldn't be my problem. Obviously, they have a different strategy than u-he, and think, a low entry price, and a lot of sales, to get more customers, is the right way.
- KVRAF
- 25849 posts since 20 Jan, 2008 from a star near where you are
Prices of VST's have come down over the years, hopefully they will come down even more.
VST's are still some of the most expensive software out there.
I would like to see max prices the same as new computer/console games, in the region $40-$50
VST's are still some of the most expensive software out there.
I would like to see max prices the same as new computer/console games, in the region $40-$50
-
- KVRAF
- 35671 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Good point, i saw they're offered already when you buy Synthmaster, and you can choose from different packages.wagtunes wrote:Their aim is to get you to buy the expansions, which are very good. Even I got them when I bought Synthmaster a few years back.chk071 wrote:Not at all.egbert101 wrote:People complaining about $10 for SynthMaster?It's great that they make it available for so many people. Even though it pretty much devalues the software, with so many sales, and now, this no-brainer sale. But that shouldn't be my problem. Obviously, they have a different strategy than u-he, and think, a low entry price, and a lot of sales, to get more customers, is the right way.
@ Numanoid: I'd be grateful about prices like $99 for well featured synths. $150 - $200 for a single synth is pretty tough.
- KVRAF
- 4536 posts since 17 Jun, 2013 from very close to Paris, France
Hmm... it depends the synth.chk071 wrote:... $150 - $200 for a single synth is pretty tough.
When it needs a lot of time in R&D like Zebra or Xils-4 or Tera or things like that, I think that it is their right price.
But yes, there are today many synths which are now really overpriced.
And not to mention the worse of all... Yooz Electric Force


Build your life everyday as if you would live for a thousand years. Marvel at the Life everyday as if you would die tomorrow.
I'm now severely diseased since September 2018.
I'm now severely diseased since September 2018.
-
- KVRAF
- 16724 posts since 13 Oct, 2009
There are simply not very many synths that I feel are worth more than $50, or even $50. There is nothing in Synthmaster that I can't do in Reaktor. The value of Synthmaster, as I mentioned, is just speed and convenience of U/I. I wouldn't pay $50 for FM8 either.exmatproton wrote:No?? 80 bucks seem cheap for the "amount of synth" one gets...Or is it just not your cup of tea?ghettosynth wrote:Which totally explains the $10 blowout price. It's a cash grab before the update release. Still, depending on what's in the update, I'd pay $39 for this synth now that I've had it. I still wouldn't pay $80 for it though.Frantz wrote:This is very tempting but I think I will pass since:
1. I don't like the synth's monochrome, busy UI.
2. Support in the KV331 forum seems consistently bad.
3. There will be a cost to upgrade to 3.0 soon. kv331 wrote "SM 2.8 -> 3.0 upgrade : $29"
I will reconsider when it hits 3.0. They are not shy about having sales.
Fixed architecture synths and effects have to bring something interesting to the table for me. A good, and rare, example for me is Revival which I paid $50 for on sale over the holidays. It's a synth built around organ models for oscillators. Urs always brings significant technical effort to the table. I appreciate Waves plugins that are built around models of hardware for which there is limited access, e.g., vinyl. I like the Zynaptic and Ircam stuff which is derived from significant research.
Basically, to me, every plugin starts at an assumption of about $20 in value. From there it can go up if there is significant technical achievement or difficult to duplicate content, e.g., samples of interesting and hard to acquire gear. It can also go down if it's just a repeat of what I already have or it has only minor improvements over other tools.
Consistently, if I break my own rules, and I have, I end up regretting the purchase.
- KVRAF
- 3375 posts since 25 Apr, 2011
hmmm. I get your approach (i disagree, but i get it).ghettosynth wrote: There are simply not very many synths that I feel are worth more than $50, or even $50. There is nothing in Synthmaster that I can't do in Reaktor. The value of Synthmaster, as I mentioned, is just speed and convenience of U/I. I wouldn't pay $50 for FM8 either.
Fixed architecture synths and effects have to bring something interesting to the table for me. A good, and rare, example for me is Revival which I paid $50 for on sale over the holidays. It's a synth built around organ models for oscillators. Urs always brings significant technical effort to the table. I appreciate Waves plugins that are built around models of hardware for which there is limited access, e.g., vinyl. I like the Zynaptic and Ircam stuff which is derived from significant research.
Basically, to me, every plugin starts at an assumption of about $20 in value. From there it can go up if there is significant technical achievement or difficult to duplicate content, e.g., samples of interesting and hard to acquire gear. It can also go down if it's just a repeat of what I already have or it has only minor improvements over other tools.
Consistently, if I break my own rules, and I have, I end up regretting the purchase.
I think the starting price is a wee bit low. Sure, there are enough synths out there, that aren't 'special' or bring nothing new. But, and SM is no exception, there are amazing synths that blow 20 to 50 dollar synth (and free ones) away. So i guess it is not your cup of tea, in that regard.
Do you mean with 'fixed architecture' not (semi-)modular?
- KVRAF
- 25849 posts since 20 Jan, 2008 from a star near where you are
Buying into a synth, and spending a bit of money on it, it is important for me that I see that the dev is not a flash in the pan, and that the dev provides upgrades.
Synths I have spent the most on like u-he, Xils, Arturia, Native Instruments, I know that they will be around in the future, and that they provide regular updates when needed.
I took for granted the same when I bought Alchemy
But that is at least rock solid on Win 10 as of now
Synths I have spent the most on like u-he, Xils, Arturia, Native Instruments, I know that they will be around in the future, and that they provide regular updates when needed.
I took for granted the same when I bought Alchemy
Last edited by Numanoid on Mon Jan 02, 2017 7:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Banned
- 163 posts since 9 Jan, 2011
I've been waiting 12 hrs for the download link email.... 
-
- KVRAF
- 2287 posts since 2 Jul, 2007
same here..no downloads yet, I'm in US so I don't think it matters.
INTERFACE: RME ADI-2/4 Pro/Antelope Orion Studio Synergy Core/BAE 1073 MPF Dual/Heritage Audio Successor+SYMPH EQ
SYNTHS: Arturia Polybrute 12/Roland Jupiter X + Juno X/Yamaha Montage M/Yamaha KX88/Softsynths + Samplers
PEDALS: Chase Bliss Mood MK II
SYNTHS: Arturia Polybrute 12/Roland Jupiter X + Juno X/Yamaha Montage M/Yamaha KX88/Softsynths + Samplers
PEDALS: Chase Bliss Mood MK II
- KVRAF
- 1595 posts since 19 May, 2011 from North Carolina
Same here.trusampler wrote:same here..no downloads yet, I'm in US so I don't think it matters.
It looks like 2.8 comes with the awesome satYatunes skin? That's a major enhancement.
I'm sure this overlaps virtually everything I have, but different synths = different workflow. Sometimes it's just inspiring mix it up. Especially for the price of a few beers
Assuming, of course, I receive valid license...
-
- KVRAF
- 16724 posts since 13 Oct, 2009
To me, semi-modular is much more specific than "has a modulation matrix." ACE is semi-modular, SynthMaster is a fixed architecture with a lot of modulation options and some flexibility within fixed choices, e.g., filter routing.exmatproton wrote:hmmm. I get your approach (i disagree, but i get it).ghettosynth wrote: There are simply not very many synths that I feel are worth more than $50, or even $50. There is nothing in Synthmaster that I can't do in Reaktor. The value of Synthmaster, as I mentioned, is just speed and convenience of U/I. I wouldn't pay $50 for FM8 either.
Fixed architecture synths and effects have to bring something interesting to the table for me. A good, and rare, example for me is Revival which I paid $50 for on sale over the holidays. It's a synth built around organ models for oscillators. Urs always brings significant technical effort to the table. I appreciate Waves plugins that are built around models of hardware for which there is limited access, e.g., vinyl. I like the Zynaptic and Ircam stuff which is derived from significant research.
Basically, to me, every plugin starts at an assumption of about $20 in value. From there it can go up if there is significant technical achievement or difficult to duplicate content, e.g., samples of interesting and hard to acquire gear. It can also go down if it's just a repeat of what I already have or it has only minor improvements over other tools.
Consistently, if I break my own rules, and I have, I end up regretting the purchase.
I think the starting price is a wee bit low. Sure, there are enough synths out there, that aren't 'special' or bring nothing new. But, and SM is no exception, there are amazing synths that blow 20 to 50 dollar synth (and free ones) away. So i guess it is not your cup of tea, in that regard.
Do you mean with 'fixed architecture' not (semi-)modular?
-
- KVRAF
- 2648 posts since 20 Jun, 2012
You gotta be kidding, right? VST synths are not expensive at all. Compared to hardware, or some of the first VST synths, for example. Just to think about it that Emulator X3 was in the range of 800$ or Neutron VS cost 900$ once.Numanoid wrote:Prices of VST's have come down over the years, hopefully they will come down even more.
VST's are still some of the most expensive software out there.
I would like to see max prices the same as new computer/console games, in the region $40-$50
It's not that I have anything against low prices but I think that if people are becoming really cheapskates, then developers will have to cut corners. Or come up with different revenue models. For example I would like to see a subscription model based on notes played.
I see no problem with occasional heavy discounts and I do not think that it undervalues software at all. It actually makes a lot of sense to discount Synthmaster if it's in its end of life. A lot of people, like me for example, who would have not even considered it at 40$ (or probably even at 15-20$) got it. And those people might upgrade eventually.
No signature here!
- KVRAF
- 3375 posts since 25 Apr, 2011
Technically, Synthmaster is semi-modular. You may experience this differently, but it is a semi-modular architecture. And i use it as such, just like A.C.E.ghettosynth wrote:To me, semi-modular is much more specific than "has a modulation matrix." ACE is semi-modular, SynthMaster is a fixed architecture with a lot of modulation options and some flexibility within fixed choices, e.g., filter routing.exmatproton wrote:hmmm. I get your approach (i disagree, but i get it).ghettosynth wrote: There are simply not very many synths that I feel are worth more than $50, or even $50. There is nothing in Synthmaster that I can't do in Reaktor. The value of Synthmaster, as I mentioned, is just speed and convenience of U/I. I wouldn't pay $50 for FM8 either.
Fixed architecture synths and effects have to bring something interesting to the table for me. A good, and rare, example for me is Revival which I paid $50 for on sale over the holidays. It's a synth built around organ models for oscillators. Urs always brings significant technical effort to the table. I appreciate Waves plugins that are built around models of hardware for which there is limited access, e.g., vinyl. I like the Zynaptic and Ircam stuff which is derived from significant research.
Basically, to me, every plugin starts at an assumption of about $20 in value. From there it can go up if there is significant technical achievement or difficult to duplicate content, e.g., samples of interesting and hard to acquire gear. It can also go down if it's just a repeat of what I already have or it has only minor improvements over other tools.
Consistently, if I break my own rules, and I have, I end up regretting the purchase.
I think the starting price is a wee bit low. Sure, there are enough synths out there, that aren't 'special' or bring nothing new. But, and SM is no exception, there are amazing synths that blow 20 to 50 dollar synth (and free ones) away. So i guess it is not your cup of tea, in that regard.
Do you mean with 'fixed architecture' not (semi-)modular?
--
I like SM and i'm wondering when they will release the update with the bigger UI.
Last edited by exmatproton on Mon Jan 02, 2017 8:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
