Yes, absolutely, it means the world for anyone, who has understood that! It sets you free and gives you clarity, making you actually go even faster, but with ease!TrojakEW wrote: It is just that I'm trying to experiment with everything and sometimes I really want to make fire and ice sit on top of each other without interaction. Like 2 stories at same time that share same "idea" but from different point of view. Example: Man running fast across the street. From perspective of viewer you think he is running because he is in a hurry and he is out of time and under pressure. But there is another view from runner itself. He is running because he have a lot of time and he is actually enjoying this activity because it make him relaxed. Almost like too different melodies/tracks playing at same time.
For me it is NOT important to achieve that goal. Important is the way that exists because of this goal. So in the end we always enjoy the ride and not the End.
Now, to set up the kind of scenario you're describing up there, you obviously want people by the end to be aware of both points of view. Most pleasant it would be to pick the relaxed one to leave the people with at the end, but I would likely "zoom out" and show a whole world of people running frantically...leaving a little
I would introduce both views separately, make them gradually, clearly identifiable as well as clearly featuring the subject. Then interplay could begin. But it would just be one approach, of course.
Fun to think about such things. But I prefer letting stories reveal themselves to me, rather than forcing a story into life. I do that, too, but I just don't prefer it. When you allow stories to present themselves to you, they come with their important subjects and you need not worry to having to invent them, hehe. At least not the key elements.
Anyway, beautiful topic! And I'd enjoy hearing your take on the running man!
