Psytrance parties and girls

Anything about MUSIC but doesn't fit into the forums above.
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

Frantz wrote:Did someone say parties and girls? :wheee:

Oh wait, it's just another thread with ghettosynth arguing with everyone. :(
This generally only happens when I'm right and the rest of KVR doesn't like this pesky thing called evidence.

I mean, WTF else would "Electronic Dance Music" mean in the 90s? I'm just gobsmacked that anyone would argue that it ever meant anything else. It's pretty clear that a new generation just co-opted the acronym to describe what they were hearing at parties and it stuck.

It's also absurd to argue about the quality of the references. They clearly show that it was widely used by many communities throughout the 90s and well into the early 2000s as an umbrella term or super-genre.

Seriously, if you disagree, what do you think it meant in in the 90s and through the 2000s and where do you think that EDM the genre came from? Just because you didn't hear the term being used doesn't mean that it wasn't widely used.

Here's a discussion over at MixMag, which, of course is using it in a contemporary way, and the first few comments are from people talking about how it was widely used WORLDWIDE as I describe it in the 90s.

http://mixmag.net/read/eight-reasons-ed ... s-not-blog

Of course there is no shortage of people who disagree, but I've posted the evidence right here, so they're wrong.

LA Weekly talking about the best EDM tracks of the 90s

http://www.laweekly.com/music/the-20-be ... ry-6251507

They point out that the use of EDM today is "controversial", of course, how could that be, if it always meant the shit 2012 genre? The answer of course, is that it DID NOT!
Electronic dance music, or EDM as it's somewhat controversially called these days, has existed in one form or another since the advent of the first drum machine.

Here's Rolling Stone magazine using the acronym appropriately to describe the greatest EDM albums of all time, Kraftwerk included. This article was from 2012 before the misuse of the term blew up as the new kiddy rave genre.

http://www.rollingstone.com/music/lists ... 6-19691231

Here's an article that points out that the term was used in corporate culture to classify music as early as 1985. Also note, as I explained earlier, it seemed to follow the use of "electronica" as an umbrella term. People didn't like that because "electronica" encompassed so much more than just dance music.
Like electronica before it, the term EDM does not have a clear etymology. What is known is that it was in use as early as 1985, as a corporate term used to envelope the disparate sounds into one easy-to-market department. EDM largely serves the same purposes today. Perhaps that’s why everyone seems to dislike the term, even those who make the music.
The article goes on to say that the use of it as an umbrella term is problematic, but, it misses the point that those who use it that way refer to what is called EDM today, as "main room house", or just shit for short.

https://medium.com/cuepoint/etymology-o ... e3aa873369


Another article on Medium referring to MixMags "The Great EDM Debate"
The global phenomenon that has taken the world by storm, and growing exponentially has been popularly categorized as “EDM Culture” — which has many traditionalists, older generation clubbers and artists alike irked. The acronym, used to generalize the dance music culture is also widely used as a blanket term and brings the different styles of dance music under one roof, especially to non-listeners of the genre.
https://medium.com/@shilpasshah/analysi ... 4ffd0e87b8

This is the stupidest f**king discussion ever. There are hundreds of other articles and links that clearly support that the term EDM has been co-opted and was widely used in the 90s and through 2012 as a blanket term. That's just a fact!

Post

AnX wrote:
Distorted Horizon wrote:Why is it that when you hit "psytrance 2017" in youtube search
Try "psytrance 1996" ie when it was good
Distorted Horizon wrote:
I mean wtf? Do I have to start making EDM? :nutter:
Psytrance is EDM
I'm aware about the original meaning.. I'm pointing now to that "thing" that only has some kick and simple plucky melody with dirt-a-lot of reverb and it's called music. DJ/"artist" has cool headphones, runs like crazy around the stage (weirdly still having those headphones), turns the knobs like a moron no matter if there's a song running or not (which doesn't matter since it doesn't affect the sound). EDM.

Post

ghettosynth wrote:
Frantz wrote:Did someone say parties and girls? :wheee:

Oh wait, it's just another thread with ghettosynth arguing with everyone. :(
This generally only happens when I'm right and the rest of KVR doesn't like this pesky thing called evidence.

You should chill down a bit. Maybe close your eyes and listen to some psytrance? If it's ok to say "psytrance" since there's quite many subgenres :hihi:

Post

Terrafractyl wrote:I think the amount of Girls at a psytrance party is often down to the music played.
Here in Australia at least, I find the parties focused on darker / faster music definitely feel very Male dominated.
Whereas a lot of the bigger festivals that book a lot of fluffy stuff (that I don't call psy btw) like spintwist recs/Neelix et al tend to have a lot larger percentage of Girls in the crowd.

I can actually relate (although not to Spintwist argh), personally I find so much Psy, and most kinds of electronic dance music(used here to cover all genres hehe) so overtly masculine.
Not that I have a problem with that, It just gets boring.
Hmm good point. Weird thing that psy would be seen "masculine". IMO it's more like spiritual genre, not some testosterone thing where you jump around pushing people (punk I'm looking at your way).

Post

Psy is very diverse and different subgenres have very different audience. There is forest, twillight, dark goa stuff which probably mostly appeals to "real machos", darkpsy which is stickly for nerds, progressive for boring office guys like me, full-on for teenagers. Psygressive and psybient apparently should appeal to new agers and hippies of both genders.

Anyway there are exceptions from any rule

Yaleeni (goa, full-on)
Image

Nikki S (full-on, morning psy)
Image

Illuchina (full-on, twillight)
Image
You may think you can fly ... but you better not try

Post

recursive one wrote:Psy is very diverse and different subgenres have very different audience. There is forest, twillight, dark goa stuff which probably mostly appeals to "real machos", darkpsy which is stickly for nerds, progressive for boring office guys like me, full-on for teenagers. Psygressive and psybient apparently should appeal to new agers and hippies of both genders.

Anyway there are exceptions from any rule.
Very illuminating comment. No matter what phonomenom, genre or interest we are talking about, real enthusiasts see always very fine tones, differencies which the "diletants" can't, which make the sub-group distinctive, to unite the tribe. Division to sub-sub-sub...groups is endles - perhaps it devides even individuals depending on the stage of the life, season of the year, day of the month and week, and time of the day it is. :party:

Post

Distorted Horizon wrote:
Terrafractyl wrote:I think the amount of Girls at a psytrance party is often down to the music played.
Here in Australia at least, I find the parties focused on darker / faster music definitely feel very Male dominated.
Whereas a lot of the bigger festivals that book a lot of fluffy stuff (that I don't call psy btw) like spintwist recs/Neelix et al tend to have a lot larger percentage of Girls in the crowd.

I can actually relate (although not to Spintwist argh), personally I find so much Psy, and most kinds of electronic dance music(used here to cover all genres hehe) so overtly masculine.
Not that I have a problem with that, It just gets boring.
Hmm good point. Weird thing that psy would be seen "masculine". IMO it's more like spiritual genre, not some testosterone thing where you jump around pushing people (punk I'm looking at your way).
:-D Seeing you reference punk as masculine is interesting. My first girlfriend (of months of relationship time) used to drag me around to local punk shows. Her friend circle was a bunch of verbally abusive jerks (focused around one guy) prior to me. She once commented how novel it was that my friend and I actually liked each other.

I hated most of the bands because they seemed to be bad at ... er... music. She seemed to prefer it that way. Like so many of my post-high school peers, she was obsessed with identity. I guess she felt compelled to like what she wanted to appear to be: "disinterested, rebellious, invulnerable, fun-loving but able to be violent at a moment's notice", was my impression of punk. I wonder if this punk obsession was part of seeming tough and untouchable for her, as per her social circle of jerkasses.
- dysamoria.com
my music @ SoundCloud

Post

ghettosynth wrote:
Frantz wrote:Did someone say parties and girls? :wheee:

Oh wait, it's just another thread with ghettosynth arguing with everyone. :(
This generally only happens when I'm right and the rest of KVR doesn't like this pesky thing called evidence.
I'm following right along with you, even though i wasn't into that music back then or following anything anywhere. But maybe this is relevant:

https://www.xkcd.com/386/
- dysamoria.com
my music @ SoundCloud

Post

"EDM" as a blanket term is LOOOOOOONG since invalidated itself.
EDM is now Spinnin records and shite like that. EDM is no longer appropriate to use as a blanket term in ANY way.
Unless you're an old rock-grandpa type who can't tell shit from shoe polish.

Post

The oracle has spoken.

Post

Jace-BeOS wrote:Seeing you reference punk as masculine is interesting. My first girlfriend (of months of relationship time) used to drag me around to local punk shows. Her friend circle was a bunch of verbally abusive jerks (focused around one guy) prior to me.
What I meant is a bit different.. Although I've seen those too that you mentioned but those punk "parties" I've been in, there's room filled with bold bodybuilders, jumping around and beating each others because... I don't even know.

It was just brutal :D

Post

Distorted Horizon wrote:Why is it that when you hit "psytrance 2017" in youtube search, and watch practically ANY video from there that has some footage from psytrance parties, there's only men in those videos?
Well, maybe they used to be woman.....
--After silence, that which comes nearest to expressing the inexpressible is music.

-Aldous Huxley

Post

recursive one wrote:Psy is very diverse and different subgenres have very different audience. There is forest, twillight, dark goa stuff which probably mostly appeals to "real machos", darkpsy which is stickly for nerds, progressive for boring office guys like me, full-on for teenagers. Psygressive and psybient apparently should appeal to new agers and hippies of both genders.

Anyway there are exceptions from any rule

Yaleeni (goa, full-on)
Image

Nikki S (full-on, morning psy)
Image

Illuchina (full-on, twillight)
Image
Non of those girls look old enough to remember psytrance :lol:

Post

I wouldn't date a girl a girl who listens to psytrance - she might be junky or just totally retarded.

Actually, one girl recently really enjoyed my psytrance tune and then I figured out she is weird :help: Talking about other states of consciousness, meditaion and WTF...
Blog ------------- YouTube channel
Tricky-Loops wrote: (...)someone like Armin van Buuren who claims to make a track in half an hour and all his songs sound somewhat boring(...)

Post

DJ Warmonger wrote: Actually, one girl recently really enjoyed my psytrance tune and then I figured out she is weird :help: Talking about other states of consciousness, meditaion and WTF...
Goes with the territory, no? I'm not much of a trance fan in general, I don't really think that it's been good since the early 90s with perhaps the exception of hard acid trance which, I admit, is something of a guilty pleasure. I'm pretty much in agreement with Ishkur on this. The entire psy scene though has always been a bit weird to me with its pseudo spirituality and weird hippy-ness. It's much more of a subculture as opposed to just a genre. I also hate the very common mixing style of mixing across spacey washy intros. I think that it's one of the few genres where you can actually get away with not beat matching. IIRC, back in the day, there were more than a few fairly prominent DJs who didn't (couldn't) beat match. I do recall whether it was necessary or not being the subject long debates on one of the aforementioned mailing lists.

I think the better question is why it has caught on in Europe? Is it less of a sub-culture there?

Post Reply

Return to “Everything Else (Music related)”