Create via Harmonics
-
- KVRian
- 855 posts since 3 Mar, 2009
That's the right click on the wave form in an oscillator, I guess.
If you see the standard sine wave as the basic harmonic then you create new waveforms by adding various amounts of harmonics of the base wave.
The harmonics are multiples of the base sine wave frequency.
If you enter in that Create via Harmonics window:
100,0,50,75 you will create a waveform containing of (in this example I use a base frequency of 250 Hz
- the base (250Hz) sine wave with 100% amplitude
- the second harmonic (500Hz) with 0% amplitude
- the third harmonic (750Hz) with 50% amplitude
- the fourth harmonic (1000Hz) with 75% amplitude
So you can create all sorts of waves. Organs work like this, or if you use every odd harmonic and reduce level the higher you go, you get a square.
Another good exercise is to see your result (with open filters!) in the spectrum analyzer. You will see exactly your entered frequencies and levels.
If you see the standard sine wave as the basic harmonic then you create new waveforms by adding various amounts of harmonics of the base wave.
The harmonics are multiples of the base sine wave frequency.
If you enter in that Create via Harmonics window:
100,0,50,75 you will create a waveform containing of (in this example I use a base frequency of 250 Hz
- the base (250Hz) sine wave with 100% amplitude
- the second harmonic (500Hz) with 0% amplitude
- the third harmonic (750Hz) with 50% amplitude
- the fourth harmonic (1000Hz) with 75% amplitude
So you can create all sorts of waves. Organs work like this, or if you use every odd harmonic and reduce level the higher you go, you get a square.
Another good exercise is to see your result (with open filters!) in the spectrum analyzer. You will see exactly your entered frequencies and levels.
- KVRist
- 409 posts since 26 Jul, 2010 from Germany
Wow, that's a really great feature. I could have used it perfectly for creating the female voice synth in my latest track. Will try this.
MuLab is so f***ing great ...
BTW: As long as features like this are not mentioned (better: explained) in the documentation, MuLab will remain the most underrated DAW. My opinion.
JR
MuLab is so f***ing great ...
BTW: As long as features like this are not mentioned (better: explained) in the documentation, MuLab will remain the most underrated DAW. My opinion.
JR
- KVRAF
- 5383 posts since 25 Jan, 2014 from The End of The World as We Knowit
^^^It might be useful for MuLab documentation to be a Wiki, so users could explain features, link to DSP definitions elsewhere, share workflows for using features, give examples-- basically all the great info in threads such as these but in one central place and user-moderated.
F E E D
Y O U R
F L O W
Y O U R
F L O W
-
- KVRist
- 388 posts since 28 Oct, 2002
Totally agree with you MichaelMichael L wrote:^^^It might be useful for MuLab documentation to be a Wiki, so users could explain features, link to DSP definitions elsewhere, share workflows for using features, give examples-- basically all the great info in threads such as these but in one central place and user-moderated.
-
- KVRAF
- 2270 posts since 30 Aug, 2004 from Lancaster, UK
Agree. MuLab is so powerful, it's a shame that some features are a bit hidden.
I hope that some of the experts could come up with a good video series, like the one put together for Reaper and put on Reaper's home page. That would really make MuLab much more well-known.
I hope that some of the experts could come up with a good video series, like the one put together for Reaper and put on Reaper's home page. That would really make MuLab much more well-known.
Thu Oct 01, 2020 1:15 pm Passing Bye wrote:
"look at SparkySpark's post 4 posts up, let that sink in for a moment"
Go MuLab!
"look at SparkySpark's post 4 posts up, let that sink in for a moment"
Go MuLab!
