DUNE 2 is out now!!
-
- KVRian
- 698 posts since 17 Sep, 2014
Sometimes, Internet forum, kvr, are magic, we start to debate about a spytrance sound, a lead with a high Hp filter, no volume env, hyper agressive fm like a visit to the dentist-and some time, it's soften-:)- and we finish, one page later, discuting about thin, fat, punch... and return to mono analog classik , a good moment ! Keep it up !
- Banned
- 10729 posts since 17 Nov, 2015
fluffy_little_something wrote:So, Ingo, you used 15 waves + filter drive + distortion + EQ in order to prove it doesn't sound thin or weak?Actually, for that it doesn't really sound as impressive or mighty as one might expect imho. Maybe there is also too much stereo for a bass.
I think it is more revealing to use just 2 or 3 waves to check whether a synth sounds weak or thin. After all, that is what most analog synths used and they sounded great at it.
From what ive seen here, ppl are saying that a (pick any) synths osc on their own sound thin, so yeah, his example is quite pointless.
You could make Steinberg Neon sound 'fat' with all that processing
- KVRAF
- 12522 posts since 21 Mar, 2008 from Hannover, Germany
DUNE 2.5 is not an anlog synth emulation and i used the features that are available there. Why should i not do that? Limiting to what is available in other synths like e.g. vintage analogs would be quite pointless IMO.fluffy_little_something wrote:So, Ingo, you used 15 waves + filter drive + distortion + EQ in order to prove it doesn't sound thin or weak?Actually, for that it doesn't really sound as impressive or mighty as one might expect imho. Maybe there is also too much stereo for a bass.
I think it is more revealing to use just 2 or 3 waves to check whether a synth sounds weak or thin. After all, that is what most analog synths used and they sounded great at it.
For such tasks i got The Legend and comparing this to DUNE 2.5 and vice versa is quite pointless.
BTW with using the FX version of The Legend and the DUNE 2.5 synth you have a way to combine both synths. When routing a MIDI track to the FX version of The Legend you could even use the built-in envelopes and Oscillators there.
Ingo Weidner
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1
-
fluffy_little_something fluffy_little_something https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=281847
- Banned
- 12880 posts since 5 Jun, 2012
Gee, that Largo audio demo sounds annoying, I bet it is part of the CIA's torture toolset 
-
fluffy_little_something fluffy_little_something https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=281847
- Banned
- 12880 posts since 5 Jun, 2012
Somehow I do consider it an analog-style synth, albeit not an emulation of any specific hardware.Ingonator wrote:DUNE 2.5 is not an anlog synth emulation and i used the features that are available there. Why should i not do that? Limiting to what is available in other synths like e.g. vintage analogs would be quite pointless IMO.
For such tasks i got The Legend and comparing this to DUNE 2.5 and vice versa is quite pointless.
BTW with using the FX version of The Legend and the DUNE 2.5 synth you have a way to combine both synths. When routing a MIDI track to the FX version of The Legend you could even use the built-in envelopes and Oscillators there.
In that genre basses seem very shallow, there is no real bottom, but instead lots of high frequencies. It might as well be a lead.
-
- KVRAF
- 5201 posts since 16 Nov, 2014
I just wish U-he put JAWS as FX unit out. Makes everything brutal, phat and distorted.
But just for interest, how do you measure fatness of a sound. Per inch?
Or should it just use all the frequencies possible....then i vote for Kaleidoscope.
But just for interest, how do you measure fatness of a sound. Per inch?
Or should it just use all the frequencies possible....then i vote for Kaleidoscope.
- Banned
- 10729 posts since 17 Nov, 2015
Ingonator wrote:
DUNE 2.5 is not an anlog synth emulation
Apart from the analogue osc wt's, analogue modelled filters, analogue modelled envelopes and analogue modelled fx, no...
- Banned
- 10729 posts since 17 Nov, 2015
I cant get that to play here. SC just keeps jumping to next track...next track...next track without actually playing anythingchk071 wrote:After the start it gets a bit weird, admittedly. But the bass sound at the start there is really delicious IMO.
-
- KVRAF
- 35675 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Does this one work?
https://soundcloud.com/waldorf-music/tanzindenmai
I also uploaded this once, which shows the snappiness of Monark:
https://soundcloud.com/chk-sound/monark-snap
Nevermind the lack of musicality, it was merely to show the filter behavior on high resonance levels, and fast decay times. Should rather be compared to Legend though, maybe.
https://soundcloud.com/waldorf-music/tanzindenmai
I also uploaded this once, which shows the snappiness of Monark:
https://soundcloud.com/chk-sound/monark-snap
Nevermind the lack of musicality, it was merely to show the filter behavior on high resonance levels, and fast decay times. Should rather be compared to Legend though, maybe.
-
- KVRAF
- 5201 posts since 16 Nov, 2014
But what should that show us. Phat, snappy, punchy? Curious. I would say squelchy
Also it is not of much use in a context of a whole track (for me).
Could you show us a single patch for your adjectives and we (or just i) could see what you mean.
-
- KVRAF
- 35675 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Yeah. Also creamy and punchy, i would say. Ah, how lovely those non-telling buzzwords are.Cinebient wrote:But what should that show us. Phat, snappy, punchy? Curious. I would say squelchy![]()
But, frankly, how to explain sound? IDK.
-
- KVRAF
- 35675 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Whenever i tried something like that in Dune 2, i rather got a blunt "thump" kind of sound, than it really becoming snappy. Guess there's something with the envelope stages, or the filter resonance, that just doesn't match. It's more similar to Monark in Legend, but it still has a bit of that.
-
- KVRAF
- 5201 posts since 16 Nov, 2014
Dagger and P900 are eating them all (FOR ME) in this field.chk071 wrote:Whenever i tried something like that in Dune 2, i rather got a blunt "thump" kind of sound, than it really becoming snappy. Guess there's something with the envelope stages, or the filter resonance, that just doesn't match. It's more similar to Monark in Legend, but it still has a bit of that.
But Dune 2 can get close (use the MSEG at audio rate).
I think Dagger is the king.
