MeldaProduction

Grunwaldt · Post by **Grunwaldt** » Mon Aug 21, 2017 5:33 am

I wonder if the separate availability of the FX plug-in's and MDrummer large makes it duplicate the memory usage. I mean, I guess MDl doesn't share the Melda kernel as do the FX's. I have currently everything from Melda and it would be cool if MDl shared the kernel to save up memory on its own effects. Is that factible? or it currently already does?

MeldaProduction · Post by **MeldaProduction** » Mon Aug 21, 2017 10:59 am

By MDI you mean MDrummer Large? (I don't understand the I there).

Anyways no it doesn't do that I'm afraid and it probably won't be possible. Technically it is very very very complicated... Also, with MDrummer we already sort of ran into a problem - it's apparently so complex and huge, that most compilers have already a problem compiling it

. So, well, things get rather tricky now...

Grunwaldt · Post by **Grunwaldt** » Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:04 am

yeah it wasn't a capitalized i, "I", was an l, "L". But thanks for the clarification, I'm a programmer myself and I guessed it right. I bet it gets very complicated as you suggest. MDL is a monster. (in a good sense)

Tagirijus · Post by **Tagirijus** » Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:39 am

MeldaProduction wrote: Also, with MDrummer we already sort of ran into a problem - it's apparently so complex and huge, that most compilers have already a problem compiling it . So, well, things get rather tricky now...

*gets a huge sledghammer and slams an idea into this thread*
Could MYYY replace MDrummer in the future somehow maybe?

MeldaProduction · Post by **MeldaProduction** » Tue Aug 22, 2017 10:04 pm

Hehe

well, I don't think so. MDrummer is way too specific

.

MeldaProduction

KVR Audio

Memory usage MDrummer large and fx's